3
1a•Fe compared to that with 1a can be defined by
K1a•Ln/K(1a•Fe)•Ln with the higher values indicating more
allosteric
suppression
was
dramatically
enhanced
,
(K1•L3/K(1•Fe)•L3 = 4.12 for 1b (n = 9) and 4.53 for 1c (n = 7)).
suppression (Table 1). Sterically more demanding ligands L2 and
L3 were prepared to enhance the degree of the allosteric
suppression (Fig. 3), with the value for K1a•L3 /K(1a•Fe)•L3
calculated to be 1.93, which was higher than that for L1 (Table 1,
entries 1 and 3). This suggests that the steric demand of a ligand
is an important factor in controlling the ligand-binding activity.
Table 1. The binding constants and the degrees of the allosteric
suppressiona
K1•Ln
K(1•Fe)•Ln
entry
1
Ln
K1•Ln /K(1•Fe)•Ln
(× 10-4 M-1)
(× 10-4 M-1)
0.528 ± 0.005
0.465 ± 0.006
1.73 ± 0.02
1
2
3
4
5
1a L1 0.867 ± 0.014
1a L2 0.707 ± 0.005
1.62 ± 0.03
1.52 ± 0.02
1.93 ± 0.05
4.12 ± 0.09
4.53 ± 0.11
(a)
1a L3
1b L3
1c L3
3.34 ± 0.08
3.68 ± 0.07
2.94 ± 0.05
2.5
0.882 ± 0.008
0.649 ± 0.012
2.0
1.5
a Procedures and conditions are described in Supplementary Material.
In conclusion, we developed a novel methodology for the
allosteric regulation of the axial ligand-binding ability of a Zn-
porphyrin unit. Ligand accessibility to the Zn atom was
considerably restrained when a metal ion (Fe(II)) was added as
an external stimulus. This induced the formation of Fe(bpy)3-type
complex, 1•Fe, in which two alkyl chain bridges came across
above and below the Zn center in the porphyrin unit. The degree
of the allosteric suppression was strongly enhanced by utilizing
the sterically demanding pyridyl ligand and the allosteric system
with shorter alkyl chains. The method presented in this paper is
applicable for the preparation of metalloporphyrin catalysts and
receptors with allosterically switchable activity.
1.0
0.5
520 540 560 580 600 620 640
wavelength / nm
Acknowledgments
(b)
1.5
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Science Research (No. 23350022) from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
1.4
1.3
1.2
References and notes
1. (a) Nabeshima, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2010, 83, 969–991. (b)
Shinkai, S.; Ikeda, M.; Sugasaki A.; Takeuchi, M. Acc. Chem. Res.
2001, 34, 494-503. (c) Yoon H. J.; Mirkin C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 11590–11591. (d) Balzani, V.; Venturi, M.; Credi, A.
Molecular Devices and Machines: A Journey into the Nanoworld,
Wiely-VCH, Weinheim: Germany, 2003. (e) Kremer, D.-C. C.;
Lützen, A. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, DOI: 10.1002/chem.201203814.
2. (a) K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith and R. Guliard eds. Porphyrin
Handbook; Academic Press, 2000, Vol. 4. (b) Collman, J. P.;
Boulatov, R.; Sunderland C. J.; Fu, L. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 561–
588.
3. (a) Schmittel, M.; De S.; Pramanik, S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012,
51, 3832-3836. (b) Peters, M. V.; Goddard R.; Hecht, S. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 7846-7849. (c) Oliveri, C. G.; Nguyen S.-B. T.;
Mirkin, C. A. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 2755-2763. (d) Shinoda, S.;
Ohashi, M; Tsukube, H. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 81-89.
4. (a) Yoon, H. J.; Kuwabara, J.; Kim J.-H.; Mirkin, C. A. Science
2010, 330, 66–69. (b) Wiester, M. J.; Ulmann P. A.; Mirkin, C. A.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 114-137.
5. Kato, M.; Hashimoto, E.; Kozaki, M.; Suzuki S.; Okada, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 309–312.
6. Spartan ’08, Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, CA.
7. (a) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett.
1975, 4467–4470. (b) Chinchilla R.; Nájera C. Chem. Rev. 2007,
107, 874–922. (c) Kozaki M.; Okada, K. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 485–
488.
8. Lee C.-H.; Lindsey, J. S. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 11427–11440.
9. Mao, G.; Orita, A.; Matsuo, D.; Hirate, T.; Iwanaga, T.; Toyota S.;
Otera, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2860–2864.
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0
0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005
[L1] / M
Figure 4. (a) UV-vis spectra resulting from the titration of 1a (5 ×
10-5 M) with L1 in a toluene/acetonitrile (1/1 (v/v)) solution. (b) The
change in the molar extinction coefficient of Q-band at 608 nm as a
function of concentration of L1. The solid line is a theoretical
binding curve obtained by a curve fitting.
Interestingly, the absolute values of binding constants of L3
were found to be approximately four times higher than those of
L1 and L2 due to stronger Lewis basicity of the nitrogen atom in
L3.13 A slightly smaller value of K1a•L2/K(1a•Fe)•L2 suggest that the
suppression effect is orientation-dependent on the phenyl
substituents on the axial pyridine ring.14
The degree of suppression of the accessibility of the ligand
could be further increased by utilizing Zn-porphyrin 1 with a
shorter alkyl chain. UV-vis titration using 1b (n = 9) or 1c (n = 7)
were performed, and the binding constants with the bulkiest
ligand (L3) in the presence and absence of Fe(II) were
determined. The axial ligand-binding constant of 1 was relatively
insensitive to the alkyl chain length; however, the degree of the
10. (a) Miyaura N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457–2483. (b)
Uetomo, A.; Kozaki, M.; Suzuki, S.; Yamanaka, K.; Ito O.; Okada,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13276-13279. (c) Aratani N.;
Osuka, A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4213-4216. (d) Kozaki, M.; Uetomo,
A.; Suzuki S.; Okada, K. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4477-4480.