3
systems such as 17, preference for the saccharin product comes
into effect. Saccharin derivatives have previously been prepared
by metallation of sulfonamides,9-12 however, the current route is
potentially useful because ring closure of the parent ester (which
would be formed by migration of the carboalkoxy group to the
aromatic ring) normally requires elevated temperatures.13
In order to probe the regiochemical preferences of the
rearrangement in more complex aromatic systems, the
naphthalene analogues 20-23 were prepared and investigated.
The migration terminus for rearrangement of the 2-substituted
naphthalenes, 18 and 19, could be either the 1 or the 3 position.
The 1H NMR spectra of 18 and 19 contained a distinctive singlet
at lowest chemical shift ( 8.45 and 8.42 ppm, respectively),
assigned to the proton in the 1 position. No such signal was
present in the 1H NMR spectra of the rearrangement products, 20
and 21. Consequently, 20 and 21 must be 1,2-derivatives, formed
by migration of the CO2R group to the 1-position (Scheme 6).
As would be expected intuitively, studies of naphthalene
derivatives have established that metallation usually occurs in the
position and ring in which the electron density is lowest.10,14,15
Therefore, the metallation of 18 and 19 at the 1-position, leading
to 20 and 21, respectively, is consistent with earlier results.16,17
Scheme 7: Reagents and conditions: i) LDA (2 equivalents), -78
°C, 60-75%.
The formation of a saccharin analogue from 22, but not 18,
may be explained in terms of the general influence of steric
factors in the reactions of naphthalene derivatives. Unfavourable
interaction between the SO2NiC3H7 entity, which has
a
considerable steric requirement, with the “peri” hydrogen atom
will tend to favour elimination of methoxide to form the
saccharin analogue, in which steric crowding will be less
pronounced than in the product with SO2NHiPr and CO2CH3
substituents in the 1 and
2 positions. In contrast, the
corresponding steric effects in 18 arising from interaction of the
“peri” hydrogen atom with the much smaller CO2CH3
substituent, are far less pronounced. Consequently, there is no
longer a thermodynamic driving force for cyclisation. The fact
that 23 does not undergo cyclisation, despite possessing a larger
CO2tBu substituent, is explicable because expulsion of tbutoxide
is unfavourable.
Scheme 6: Reagents and conditions: i) LDA (2 equivalents), -78
°C, 70%.
Parallel results were obtained for the 1-substituted species, 22
and 23, for which rearrangement to either the 2 or 8 (“peri”)
position could occur. Treatment of 22 with excess LDA (2
equivalents) under standard conditions gave the 1,2-disubstituted
1
product, 24: the H NMR spectrum of this product showed a
In conclusion, four further useful discoveries have been made
about the scope and regioselectivity of the nitrogen to carbon
rearrangement of orthogonally protected sulfonamides. Firstly,
the rearrangement may be induced even when a substituent that
could be deprotonated under the reaction conditions required for
the acyl or carboalkoxy transfer is attached to the aromatic ring,
provided that excess lithium diisopropylamide is employed, so as
to deprotonate the other group and facilitate ortho metallation.
Secondly, acyl substituents containing acidic -protons may be
caused to migrate, provided that these protons are flanked by
branched alkyl groups. Thirdly, sequential migration of two
substituents can be effected; moreover, spontaneous cyclisation
of the intermediate species sometimes occurs to form a saccharin
derivative, which would otherwise be accessible only under more
forcing conditions. Fourthly, essentially regiospecific migration
of a carboalkoxy group in naphthalene systems is possible to the
electron deficient ring to which the sulfonamide substituent is
attached. These discoveries substantially enhance the synthetic
utility of this novel rearrangement.
singlet at 1.70 ppm and a doublet at 4.92 ppm, which were
assigned to the t-butyl and NH group, respectively (Scheme 7).
Similar behaviour was observed for 23, but the isolated
compound was not the 1,2-disubstituted product, but the derived
saccharin analogue, 26. The regiochemistry of this rearrangement
is generally consistent with literature precedent: metallation
would be expected to occur at the 2-position because this ring has
the sulfonamide substituent (and is, therefore, less electron rich
than the unsubstituted ring) and is “ortho” to the sulfonamide
group. 11,14-16
A plausible mechanism by which a saccharin analogue could
be formed from 22 is direct elimination of a methoxide anion
from the tetrahedral intermediate, 25 (Scheme 7). The formation
of a saccharin analogue from the intermediate tetrahedral anion
formed from 23 would entail elimination of a tbutoxy anion,
which is a distinctly poorer leaving group than a methoxy anion.
References and notes
1.
2.
3.
4.
Zelder, F.; Sonnay, M; Prieto, L., ChemBioChem., 2015, 16, 1264-
1278.
Lyden, P.; Pereira, B.; Chen, B.; Zhao, L.; Lamb, J.; Lei, L. F.;
Rajput, P., Stroke, 2014, 45, 896-899.
Chinthakindi, P. K.; Naicker, T.; Thota, N.; Govender, T; Kruger,
H.; Arvidsson, P. L., Angew. Int. Ed. Engl., 2017, 56, 4100-4109.
Kocienski, P. J., Protecting Groups 3rd edition, Thieme: Stuttgart,
2000.