.
Angewandte
Communications
the distal olefinic moiety of the dienamine intermediate,
thereby resulting in regioselective 3,4-functionalization. In
particular, the application of alkyl 2-oxo-4-arylbut-3-enoates
as heterodienes seemed promising, since the a-ketoester
moiety is a well-recognized motif in H-bonding catalysis.[11]
To evaluate the concept, the reaction between methyl 2-
oxo-4-phenylbut-3-enoate (2a) and (E)-4-phenylbut-2-enal
(1a) in the presence of various aminocatalysts was performed
(Table 1). It was found that both steric shielding catalyst 4
(Table 1, entry 1) and H-bond-directing catalysts 5a,b
survey (Table 1, entries 6–11) indicated that the use of THF
resulted in pronounced increase in selectivity, albeit longer
reaction times were required to achieve high conversion
(Table 1, entry 11). Further screening concerning concentra-
tion and additives applied did not lead to improvement of the
results (see the Supporting Information for details).
After having optimized the conditions for the inverse-
electron-demand hetero-Diels–Alder reaction, the scope of
the methodology was evaluated. Initially, various b,g-unsatu-
rated a-ketoesters 2 with different substitution patterns and
electronic properties were examined (Table 2). Gratifyingly,
ketoesters 2e–l bearing different electron-withdrawing sub-
Table 1: Enantioselective dienamine-mediated inverse-electron-demand
hetero-Diels–Alder reaction: optimization studies.[a]
Table 2: Enantioselective dienamine-mediated inverse-electron-demand
hetero-Diels–Alder reaction: b,g-unsaturated a-ketoester scope.[a]
Entry R (2)
t [h] Yield [%] (3)
d.r.[b] ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ph (2d)
96 82 (3d)
42 74 (3e)
24 66 (3 f)
120 64 (3g)
72 75 (3h)
24 73 (3i)
48 60 (3j)
24 74 (3k)
27 78 (3l)
72 51 (3m)
48 59 (3n)
24 42 (3o)
11:1
11:1
9:1
3:1
6:1
90
90
91
79
91
93
87
91
90
85
89
90
4-Br-C6H4 (2e)
3-Br-C6H4 (2 f)
2-Br-C6H4 (2g)
2-F-C6H4 (2h)
4-CF3-C6H4 (2i)
4-CO2Me-C6H4 (2j)
4-NO2-C6H4 (2k)
2,6-Cl2-C6H3 (2l)
4-CH3-C6H4 (2m)
3-pyridyl (2n)
Me (2o)
Entry Cat. R (2)
Solvent t [h] Conv. [%][b] d.r.[c] ee [%][d]
1[e]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
4
Me (2a) CH2Cl2
Me (2a) CH2Cl2
Me (2a) CH2Cl2
20
20
48
20
18
48
72
96
48
91
>95
83
>95
>95
90
90
92
80
93
6:1 25
9:1 78
6:1 18
8:1 76
7:1 71
9:1 82
14:1 79
13:1 82
11:1 86
11:1 85
11:1 90
10:1
8:1
5a
5b
5a
5a
5a
5a
5a
5a
5a
5a
11:1
>20:1
17:1
10:1
10:1
Et (2b)
Bn (2c)
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
9
10
11
12[d]
tBu (2d) CH2Cl2
tBu (2d) Et2O
tBu (2d) MTBE
tBu (2d) DME
tBu (2d) dioxane 96
tBu (2d) THF 90
[a] Reactions performed on a 0.2 mmol scale (see the Supporting
Information for details). [b] Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
[c] Determined by chiral-stationary-phase HPLC or ultraperformance
convergence chromatography (UPC2; see the Supporting Information for
details). [d] Isolated after reduction to the corresponding alcohol. Yield
over two steps given.
10
11
88
[a] Reactions performed on a 0.1 mmol scale (see the Supporting
Information for details). MTBE= methyl tert-butyl ether, DME=1,2-
1
dimethoxyethane. [b] Conversion of 2 as determined by H NMR
spectroscopy. [c] Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. [d] Determined
by HPLC using a chiral stationary phase after Ramirez olefination.
[e] Reaction performed in the absence of DEA using 20 mol% of the
catalyst. ent-3a was obtained.
stituents on the aromatic ring were easily reacted under the
established reaction conditions (Table 2, entries 2–9). In most
of the cases, good yields and high stereoselectivities were
obtained. With respect to the substitution pattern, introduc-
tion of a sterically demanding ortho-bromo substituent on the
aromatic ring of 2 led to deterioration of selectivity (Table 2,
entry 4). However, this was not the case for the smaller ortho-
fluoro substituent (Table 2, entry 5). Furthermore, an aro-
matic ring having two ortho-substituents was well-tolerated as
demonstrated for 2l affording 3l in good yield and in a highly
stereoselective manner (Table 2, entry 9). Interestingly, het-
erodiene 2m bearing an electron-rich substituent on the
aromatic ring was less reactive and yielded the target product
3m with slightly inferior results (Table 2, entry 10). Further-
more, stereoselective synthesis of heteroaromat-containing
dihydropyrans proved possible affording 3n in good yield and
(Table 1, entries 2,3) promoted the desired inverse-electron-
demand hetero-Diels–Alder reaction. Interestingly, the H-
bond-directing approach outperformed the classical steric
shielding strategy[12] in terms of both chemical efficiency and
stereoselectivity, and aminocatalyst 5a proved to be the most
effective (Table 1, entry 2). Notably, in the case of H-bond-
directing aminocatalysts 5a,b, N,N-diethylacetamide (DEA)
was used as an additive influencing the catalytic activity of the
system.[10] Further screening revealed that increasing the bulk
of the ester moiety of 2 led to improved enantiocontrol of the
reaction (Table 1, entries 2,4–6), with tert-butyl ester 2d
giving the best result (Table 1, entry 6). Subsequent solvent
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 13109 –13113