Scheme 1. One-Pot Synthesis of Tropinone in Aqueous Solution
coumarins, such as the Perkin, Pechmann, or Knoevenagel
reaction, were usually conducted under harsh reaction
conditions.8 The modern atom-economic syntheses of
coumarins by hydroarylation reactions of alkynoates were
carried out under mild conditions, but using expensive
transition metals such as Pd,7i,9aꢀe Pt,9f,g and Au9h
as catalysts. It was also reported that inexpensive metal
salts such as Fe10a,b or Zn7j,10cꢀe could also be efficient
catalysts. Due to our long-lasting interest in water-
promoted organic reactions,11 we investigated the reac-
tions of electron-rich phenols with alkynoic acids or
alkynoates in water and reported herein that the hydro-
arylation reactions of propiolic acid or propiolate worked
in refluxing water and gave coumarin products in high
yields. We further presented that the skeletons of two
Figure 1. Natural pyranocoumarins.
natural pyranocoumarins could be constructed in one step
through an aqueous tricomponent reaction.
Since many coumarins contain a phloroglucinol (4a)
core (Figure 1),6 the preliminary trial was carried out by
adding 4a and 1.2 equiv of propiolic acid (5a) in water
(both of the two reactants can dissolve in water).12 As
the reaction proceeded under refluxing conditions, 5,7-
dihydroxycoumarin (6a, a natural coumarin first isolated
in 1982,13 83% yield) formed as a light yellow precipitate
(entry 1, Table 1). The minor product of reaction was
bicoumarin 7 (5% yield, Scheme 2). At 75 °C, only a 57%
yield of 6a was obtained with 61% conversion of phloro-
glucinol (entry 2). The reaction barely took place
in room-temperature water or in refluxing methanol
(entries 3, 4). 1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)
also has high ionizing power like water but can dissolve
most organic compounds. When replacing water with the
mixed solvent ofHFIPandH2O (v:v= 1:1), a 63% yield of
6a was obtained with 64% conversion of phloroglucinol
(entry 5). We also tested the neat conditions by heating
solid 4a in liquid 5a in an oil bath at 110 °C. It turned out
that the neat reaction gave a parallel yield with that held in
aqueous solution (entry 6). For practical reasons and
because of our interest of investigating the possible role
of water in the natural occurrence of complicated natural
products, water was chosen as the reaction medium in the
current study. When using 3 equiv of propiolic acid, all
phloroglucinol could be converted within 4 h under reflux-
ing conditions (entry 7) and the cleaner but slower reaction
at 75 °C gave the highest yield of 96% (entry 8). The
reaction using ethyl propiolate (5b) proceeded equally well
in refluxing water and gave an 81% yield of 6a after 24 h
(entry 9). A control experiment showed that this reaction
did not proceed under neat conditions. The reaction of
monomethylated phloroglucinol 4b was slower compared
with 4a, which was probably due to its lower aqueous
solubility (entry 10). Notably, the regioselectivity of the
(5) The catalyst-free one-pot synthesis of natural products in alco-
ꢀ
holic solvents: (a) Semple, J. E.; Wang, P. C.; Lysenko, Z.; Joullie,
M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7505. (b) De Laszlo, S. E.; Williard,
P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 199. (c) Tsuchida, K.; Mizuno, Y.;
Ikeda, K. Heterocycles 1981, 15, 883. The catalyst-free one-pot synthesis
of natural-product-like molecules in water: (d) Santra, S.; Andreana,
P. R. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5035. (e) De Silva, R. A.; Santra, S.; Andreana,
P. R. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4541. (f) Santra, S.; Andreana, P. R. J. Org.
Chem. 2011, 76, 2261. (g) Santra, S.; Andreana, P. R. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 9418. (h) Gu, Y. -L.; De Sousa, R.; Frapper, G.;
ꢀ ^
Bachmann, C.; Barrault, J.; Jerome, F. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1968.
(6) Venugopala, K. N.; Rashmi, V.; Odhav, B. Biomed. Res. Int.
201310.1155/2013/963248.
(7) The previous total syntheses of pyranocoumarins 1, 2, 3: (a)
Ganguly, A. K.; Joshi, B. S.; Kamat, V. N.; Manmade, A. H. Tetrahedron
1967, 23, 4777. (b) Ahluwalia, V. K.; Bhat, M. K.; Prakash, C.; Bala, S.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1980, 53, 1070. (c) Tsukayama, M.; Sakamoto, T.;
Horie, T.; Masumura, M.; Nakayama, M. Heterocycles 1981, 16, 955. (d)
Murray, R. D. H.; Jorge, Z. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 3403. (e)
Murray, R. D. H.; Jorge, Z. D. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 3129. (f) Takeuchi,
Y.; Xie, L.; Cosentino, L. M.; Lee, K.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997,
7, 2573. (g) Xie, L.; Takeuchi, Y.; Cosentino, L. M.; Lee, K.-H. J. Med.
Chem. 1999, 42, 2662. (h) Nicolaou, K. C.; Pfefferkorn, J. A.; Roecker,
A. J.; Cao, G.-Q.; Barluenga, S.; Mitchell, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 9939. (i) Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D.; Greenman, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 4518. (j) Melliou, E.; Magiatis, P.; Mitaku, S.; Skaltsounis,
A.-L.; Chinou, E.; Chinou, I. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68, 78.
(8) (a) Sethna, S. M.; Shah, N. M. Chem. Rev. 1945, 36, 1. (b)
Fedorov, A. Y.; Nyuchev, A. V.; Beletskaya, I. P. Chem. Heterocycl.
Compd. 2012, 48, 166 and the references cited therein.
(9) (a) Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6305.
(b) Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9074. (c)
Kitamura, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Kotani, M.; Oyamada, J.; Jia, C.;
Fujiwara, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2003, 76, 1889. (d) Aoki, S.;
Oyamada, J.; Kitamura, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78, 468. (e)
Oyamada, J.; Jia, C.; Fujiwara, Y.; Kitamura, T. Chem. Lett. 2002, 380.
(f) Oyamada, J.; Kitamura, T. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 6918. (g) Oyamada,
J.; Kitamura, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 3823. (h) Shi, Z.-J.; He, C.
J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3669.
(10) (a) Li, R.; Wang, S. R.; Lu, W. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2219. (b)
Kutubi, M. S.; Hashimoto, T.; Kitamura, T. Synthesis 2011, 8, 1283. (c)
~
Kaufman, K. D.; Kelly, R. C. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1965, 2, 91. (d) Leao,
R. A. C.; de Moraes, P. F.; Pedro, M. C. B. C.; Costa, P. R. R. Synthesis
2011, 3692. (e) Kalyanam, N.; Nagarajan, A.; Majeed, M. Synth.
Commun. 2004, 34, 1909.
(11) (a) Wang, Z.; Cui, Y.-T.; Xu, Z.-B.; Qu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
73, 2270. (b) Wang, J.; Liang, Y.-L.; Qu, J. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5144.
(c) Li, G.-X.; Qu, J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 2653. (d) Xu, Z.-B.; Qu, J.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2013, 19, 314.
(12) The water we used to carry out the reactions was double distilled
water. The pH value of the double distilled water is 5.5ꢀ6 because of the
dissolved CO2. The possible effect of dissolved CO2 in water was
evaluated by conducting the reactions under a nitrogen atmosphere
with degassed water, but no difference in reactivity was found.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(13) Batsuren, D.; Batirov, E. Kh.; Malikov, V. M. Chem. Nat.
Compd. 1982, 18, 616.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX