tries 1 and 2). Gold(I)–chloride
and gold(III)–chloride salts also
did not furnish any cyclized
compounds (Table 1, entries 3
and 4); AuCl3 gave consequent
amounts of elimination product
3a. When we switched to cat-
ionic gold(I) catalysts, we were
pleased to obtain the desired
compound (2a). The PPh3 ligand
led to moderate yields, inde-
pendent of the counteranion
(Table 1, entries 5 and 6). How-
ever, the use of the bulky donor
ligand P(tBu)3 improved the
yield to 75% (Table 1, entry 7).
Thus, we decided to try cationic
gold(I) catalysts with hindered,
strongly donating ligands and
we found that phosphine L1
(Table 1, entry 8) or NHC L2
(Table 1, entry 9) were ideal li-
gands for this cycloisomerization
reaction: the desired compound
was isolated in 84% and 85%
yield, respectively. We also in-
vestigated the activity of an IrIII
dimer complex that has been re-
cently shown to be active in
some enyne-cycloisomerization
processes,[15] but, even after pro-
longed heating in 1,2-dichloro-
ethane (DCE), the starting mate-
Table 2. Gold-catalyzed reactions of O-tethered 1,6-enynes 1b–1p.
Entry
Substrate
Catalyst[a]
t
[h]
Product(s)
Yield
[%]
1
2
2
4
5
6
1b
1c
1d
1e
1 f
R1 =R2 =H
A
B
B
B
B
B
1
14
1.25
14
1.5
1
2b, 4b
2c
2d
2e
2 f
65, 18
R1 =Ph, R2 =H
R1 =Ph, R2 =Me
R1 =iPr, R2 =H
R1 =a,[e] R2 =H
R1 =CO2Et, R2 =H
76
>98
55
62
97 (8:2)[b]
1g
4g, 5g
7
8
9
10
1h
1i
1j
R2 =R3 =R4 =H
B
B
B
B
2
2
18
2
2h
2i
2j
82
81
37
12[c]
R2 =R4 =H, R3 =Ph
R2 =Me, R3 =R4 =H
R2 =H, R3 =R4 =Me
1k
2k
11
12
13
14
1l
1m
1n
1o
R1 =b,[e] R2 =H
R1 =nBu, R2 =H
R1 =nBu, R2 =Me
R1 =Ph, R2 =H
A
A
A
A
4
17
6
2l
2m
2n
2o
81
70
85
15
17
[d]
15
1p
48
2p
52
[a] A=[L1Au(MeCN)]SbF6, B=[L2AuCl]/AgSbF6. [b] Inseparable mixture. [c] Formation of the corresponding
allene was observed. [d] [(2,4-tBuPhO)3PAuCl/AgSbF6] was used as the catalyst. [e]
rial was fully recovered (Table 1, entry 10).
With these optimized conditions in hand (Table 1, entries 8
and 9), we examined the scope and limitations of the ring-ex-
pansion reaction (Table 2). First, we started our study with five-
membered-ring precursors. The treatment of enyne 1b with
catalyst A afforded a mixture of the expected ring-expansion
product (2b) in 65% yield, as well as compound 4b, which ori-
ginated from a 5-exo-dig process, in 18% yield.[5] The selectivity
and yield of the reaction were improved by the introduction of
a phenyl group onto the terminal alkyne by using catalyst B.
Only ring-expansion product 2c was obtained in 76% yield
(Table 2, entry 2). When the double bond was substituted by
a methyl group, compound 2d was obtained in quantitative
yield (Table 2, entry 3). Substitution of the alkyne by isopropyl
or vinyl groups in the presence of catalyst B led to the ring-ex-
pansion compounds in similarly moderate yields (Table 2, en-
tries 4 and 5). When ester-substituted compound 1g was sub-
mitted to the same catalytic system, an inseparable mixture of
products 4g and 5g was obtained in a good yield (97%, 80:20
ratio). Acetylenic–cyclopropyl-substituted substrates 1h–1j af-
forded very good yields of the expected ring-expansion prod-
ucts (Table 2, entries 7 and 8). The expected stereochemistry of
compound 2i was confirmed by X-ray diffraction (Figure 1). In
contrast, when the double bond was substituted by a Me
group at the R2 position, a low yield of product 2j (37%) was
obtained (Table 2, entry 9). Moreover, when a prenyl group
was present (Table 2, entries 10), a very low yield of the ring-
1
expansion product was obtained. Indeed, in the H NMR spec-
trum of the crude product, we noticed the presence of an al-
dehyde signal, as well as large amounts of a volatile allenic
compound, which was confirmed by 13C NMR spectroscopy
with a signal at d=200 ppm. In this case, a competitive 1,5-hy-
dride shift onto the activated triple bond occurred, as reported
by Gagosz and co-workers[16] and ourselves.[7e]
Figure 1. X-ray crystal structure of compound 2i (CCDC-887772).
&2
&
ꢁ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemCatChem 0000, 00, 1 – 4
ÝÝ
These are not the final page numbers!