synthesis of lyconadin A.9 Drawing on the logic employed
in our approach to the nankakurines, the common skeletal
patterns embedded within lyconadin C and luciduline led
us to investigate a synthetic sequence from the luciduline
framework to this new alkaloid. In this Letter, we describe
a concise and enantioselective total synthesis of lyconadin
C that not only passes through a luciduline-like precursor
but also features an efficient method for the construction
of pyridone-containing heterocycles through a tandem
Curtius rearrangement/6π-electrocylization.
of (R)-5-methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one (9)10 and 2-tert-butyl-
dimethylsiloxy-1,3-butadiene (10)11 provided cis-decalone
11, now bearing a silyl enol ether function, with minimal
amounts of its trans-decalone epimer (cis/trans > 20:1).12
Conversion of the ketone in 11 to secondary amine 12,
achieved via reductive amination with benzylamine and
NaBH(OAc)3,13 effectively delivered hydride at the de-
sired, convex face of the decalin system (dr >10:1). Treat-
ment of secondaryamine 12 with aqueous formaldehyde at
rt cleanly effected Mannich-type ring closure,14 delivering
the benzylamine analog of luciduline (13) in 74% yield.
Hydrogenolysis of the benzylamine function in 13 and
installation of a carbamate group provided Cbz-luciduline
(7), which could be prepared in gram-scale quantities in
high overall yield.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Luciduline Analog 7
Figure 1. Selected Lycopodium alkaloids.
In the early planning stages, we envisioned that the
seven-membered ring within lyconadin C could be fash-
ioned through one-carbon ring expansion of a suitable
luciduline congener (7, Scheme 1). With the ready avail-
ability of luciduline or its analogs, we anticipated that such
a protocol would provide sufficient quantities of a suitably
functionalized cycloheptanone (8), which would in turn
serve as the foundation on which methods toward pyri-
done annulation could be investigated.
Having reached the first checkpoint in the synthesis,
attention was then given to expansion of the cyclohexa-
none ring in 7. While various methods for ring expansions
were explored, we identified the rhodium-catalyzed expan-
sion of R-diazoalcohols to be the most effective protocol.15
Addition of lithiated ethyl diazoacetate onto the ketone
function in 7 gave tertiary alcohol 15 (Scheme 3) as a single
Scheme 1. Strategic Bond Formations toward Lyconadin C
(12) For detailed discussions of similar DielsꢀAlder reactions, see:
(a) Angell, E. C.; Fringuelli, F.; Minuti, L.; Pizzo, F.; Porter, B.;
Taticchi, A.; Wenker, E. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 4686–4690. (b) Organ,
M. G.; Winkle, D. D. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1881–1885.
(13) (a) Abdel-Magid, A. F.; Carson, K. G.; Harris, B. D.; Maryanoff,
C. A.; Shah, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3849–3862. (b) Abdel-Magid,
A. F.; Mehrman, S. J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2006, 10, 971–1031.
(14) For examples of Mannich-type reactions in the total synthesis of
Lycopodium alkaloids, see: (a) Heathcock, C. H.; Kleinman, E. F.;
Binkly, E. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 1054–1068. (b) Yang, H.;
Carter, R. G.; Zakharov, L. N J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9238–9239.
(c) Liau, B. B.; Shair, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 9594–9595. (d)
Ramharter, J.; Weinstabl, H.; Mulzer, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
14338–14339. (e) Also see ref 2a.
Our synthesis commenced with a 5-step preparation of
Cbz-luciduline analog 7 (Scheme 2), fashioned through a
sequence similar to our previous 3-step total synthesis of
luciduline (1).3a Lewis acid mediated DielsꢀAlder reaction
(10) (a) Caine, D.; Procter, K.; Cassell, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49,
~
2647–2648. (b) Carreno, M. C.; Garcıa Ruano, J. L.; Martın, A. M.;
´ ´
ꢀ
Pedregal, C.; Rodriguez, J. H.; Rubio, A.; Sanchez, J.; Solladie, G.
J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2120–2128. (c) Fleming, I.; Maiti, P.; Ramarao,
C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3989–4004.
(15) For examples of Rh(II)-catalyzed ring expansion reactions of
R-diazoalcohols, see: (a) Nagao, K.; Chiba, M.; Kim, S. Synthesis 1983,
197–199. (b) Padwa, A.; Kulkarni, Y. S.; Zhang, Z. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 4144–4153. (c) Jiang, N.; Ma, Z.; Qu, Z.; Xing, X.; Xie, L.; Wang, J.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 893–900.
(16) (a) Marchand, A. P.;Arney, B. E.; Gilardi, R.;Flippen-Anderson,
J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 3455–3457. (b) Hashimoto, T.; Naganawa,
Y.; Maruoka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6614–6617.
(11) (a) Vedejs, E.; Eberlein, T. H.; Mazur, D. J.; McClure, C. K.;
Perry, D. A.; Ruggeri, R.; Schwartz, E.; Stults, J. S.; Varie, D. L. J. Org.
Chem. 1986, 51, 1556–1562. (b) Kirmse, W.; Mrotzeck, U. Chem. Ber.
1988, 121, 485–492. (c) Yeh, M. P.; Hwu, C. J. Organomet. Chem. 1991,
419, 341–355.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX