Job/Unit: O30465
/KAP1
Date: 11-06-13 17:32:08
Pages: 7
Solvatochromic D-π-A Dyes
(400 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 0.78 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.15–1.21 on the dye-adsorbed TiO2 film in the transmission mode with a
(m, 2 H), 1.59–1.68 (m, 4 H), 2.00–2.06 (m, 2 H), 3.2–3.4 (m, 2 H, calibrated integrating sphere system.
overlapping peak of dissolved water in [D6]DMSO), 4.35 (t, J =
7.2 Hz, 2 H), 4.59 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.88 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1 H),
7.05–7.09 (m, 6 H), 7.15 (s, 1 H), 7.31–7.35 (m, 4 H), 7.90 (d, J =
8.4 Hz, 1 H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 8.26 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H),
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Copies of H NMR spectra for OD5 and OD6.
1
8.35 (s, 1 H), 8.66 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 9.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H)
Acknowledgments
ppm. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C37H37N3O3SNa [M + Na+]
626.24478; found 626.24469.
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
(B) (23350097) and (C) (24550225) from the Japan Society for the
Promotion of Science (JSPS), and by a research grant from the
JGC-S SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION.
4-[9-Butyl-7-(diphenylamino)-9H-carbazol-2-yl]-1-(4-carboxybutyl)-
pyridin-1-ium Bromide (OD6):
solution of 1[12] (0.10 g,
A
0.21 mmol) and 5-bromopentanoic acid (0.038 g, 0.21 mmol) in an-
hydrous DMF (20 mL) was stirred at 90 °C for 3 h. After concen-
trating under reduced pressure, the resulting residue was washed
with acetone and then toluene to give OD6 (0.012 g, 9%) as a yel-
[1] B. O’Regan, M. Grätzel, Nature 1991, 353, 737–740.
[2] A. Hagfeldt, G. Boschloo, L. Sun, L. Kloo, H. Pettersson,
Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663.
low solid. IR (ATR): ν = 1715, 1620 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
˜
[D6]DMSO): δ = 0.78 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3 H), 1.15–1.21 (m, 2 H),
1.51–1.55 (m, 2 H), 1.64–1.68 (m, 2 H), 1.94–1.99 (m, 2 H), 2.30
(t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 4.36 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 4.58 (t, J = 6.8 Hz,
2 H), 6.89 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.05–7.09 (m, 6 H), 7.15 (d,
J = 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.30–7.35 (m, 4 H), 7.91 (dd, J = 1.6, 8.4 Hz, 1
H), 8.14 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 8.26 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.35 (s, 1
H), 8.67 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 9.07 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 12.14 (s, 1
[3] A. Mishra, M. K. R. Fischer, P. Bäuerle, Angew. Chem. 2009,
121, 2510–2536; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2474–2499.
[4] a) Y. Ooyama, Y. Harima, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 18, 2903–
2934; b) Y. Ooyama, Y. Harima, ChemPhysChem 2012, 13,
4032–4080.
[5] a) Z. Ning, H. Tian, Chem. Commun. 2009, 5483–5495; b) Z.
Ning, Y. Fu, H. Tian, Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1170–1181.
[6] a) T. Bessho, S. M. Zakeeruddin, C.-Y. Yeh, E. W.-G. Diau, M.
Grätzel, Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 6796–6799; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6646–6649; b) A. Yella, H.-W. Lee, H. N.
Tsao, C. Yi, A. K. Chandiran, M. K. Nazeeruddin, E. W.-G.
Diau, C.-Y. Yeh, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M. Grätzel, Science 2011,
334, 629–634.
[7] C. Reichardt in Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemis-
try, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
[8] a) A. Botrel, A. Beuze, P. Jacques, H. Strub, J. Chem. Soc.
Faraday Trans. 1984, 80, 1235–1252; b) J. O. Morley, R. M.
Morley, R. Docherty, M. H. Charlton, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 10192–10202.
[9] Z.-S. Wang, F.-Y. Li, C.-H. Huang, L. Wang, M. Wei, L.-P. Jin,
N.-Q. Li, J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 9676–9682.
[10] M. Cheng, X. Yang, J. Li, C. Chen, J. Zhao, Y. Wang, L. Sun,
Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 16196–16202.
[11] a) Y. Ooyama, R. Asada, S. Inoue, K. Komaguchi, I. Imae, Y.
Harima, New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 2311–2316; b) Y. Ooyama,
K. Kushimoto, Y. Oda, D. Tokita, N. Yamaguchi, S. Inoue, T.
Nagano, Y. Harima, J. Ohshita, Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 8577–
8580; c) Y. Ooyama, Y. Oda, T. Mizumo, J. Ohshita, Tetrahe-
dron 2013, 69, 1755–1760.
[12] a) Y. Ooyama, S. Inoue, T. Nagano, K. Kushimoto, J. Ohshita,
I. Imae, K. Komaguchi, Y. Harima, Angew. Chem. 2011, 123,
7567–757; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7429–7433; b) Y.
Ooyama, T. Nagano, S. Inoue, I. Imae, K. Komaguchi, J. Ohsh-
ita, Y. Harima, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 14837–14843.
[13] M. J. S. Dewar, E. G. Zoebisch, E. F. Healy, J. J. P. Stewart, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902–3909.
H) ppm. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for C38H38N3O2 [M
568.29585; found 568.29596.
–
Br]+
Computational Methods: Semiempirical calculations were carried
out with the WinMOPAC (Ver. 3.9) package (Fujitsu, Chiba, Ja-
pan). Geometry calculations in the ground state were made by
using the AM1 method.[13] All geometries were completely opti-
mized (keyword PRECISE) by the eigenvector-following routine
(keyword EF). HOMO and LUMO of the compounds were evalu-
ated from INDO/S calculations.[14] All INDO/S calculations were
performed by using single excitation full SCF/CI (self-consistent
field/configuration interaction), which included the configuration
with one electron excited from any occupied orbital to any unoccu-
pied orbital, where 225 configurations were considered [keyword
CI (15 15)].
Fabrication of the Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Dyes OD5
and OD6: TiO2 paste (JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd., PST-
18NR) was deposited on a fluorine-doped-tin-oxide (FTO) sub-
strate by doctor-blading, and sintered at 450 °C for 50 min. The
9 μm thick TiO2 electrode (0.5ϫ0.5 cm2 in photoactive area) was
immersed into a 0.05 mm dye solution in dichloromethane for suf-
ficient time to allow the electrode to adsorb the photosensitizer.
The DSSCs were fabricated by using the TiO2 electrode thus pre-
pared, Pt-coated glass as a counter electrode, and a solution of
0.05 m iodine, 0.1 m lithium iodide, and 0.6 m 1,2-dimethyl-3-prop-
ylimidazolium iodide in acetonitrile, dichloromethane/acetonitrile,
dibromomethane/acetonitrile, or diiodomethane/acetonitrile as
electrolyte. The photocurrent–voltage characteristics were mea-
sured by using a potentiostat under simulated solar light (AM 1.5,
100 mWcm–2). IPCE spectra were measured under monochromatic
irradiation with a tungsten-halogen lamp and a monochromator.
The amount of adsorbed dye on TiO2 nanoparticles was deter-
mined by absorption spectral measurement of the concentration
change of the dye solution before and after adsorption. Absorption
spectra of the dyes adsorbed on TiO2 nanoparticles were recorded
[14] a) J. E. Ridley, M. C. Zerner, Theor. Chim. Acta 1973, 32, 111–
134; b) J. E. Ridley, M. C. Zerner, Theor. Chim. Acta 1976, 42,
223–236; c) A. D. Bacon, M. C. Zerner, Theor. Chim. Acta
1979, 53, 21–54.
[15] C. Bauer, P. Jacques, A. Kalt, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 307,
397–406.
[16] K. Bourikas, M. Stylidi, D. I. Kondaridas, X. E. Verykios,
Langmuir 2005, 21, 9222–9230.
Received: April 1, 2013
Published Online:
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 0000, 0–0
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
7