group R to an allyloxy group. The proposed reaction is
shown in Scheme 1. At first, deprotonation by a Brønsted
base followed by [2,3]-Wittig rearrangement provides alk-
oxide C. Conventional [2,3]-Wittig rearrangement is ter-
minated at this point; for the designed substrate, 1,2-
rearrangement of the phosphono group from carbon to
oxygen, i.e., phospha-Brook rearrangement, occurs to
generate carbanion D. Finally, carbanion D is protonated
by the conjugated acid of the Brønsted base or substrate A
to afford the product along with regeneration of the
Brønsted base or carbanion B. The key step for the
catalytic reaction is the last step of the catalytic cycle,
which involves regeneration of the Brønsted base or R-
allyloxy carbanion. For conventional [2,3]-Wittig rearran-
gement, this step is difficult because the acidity of the
proton R to the allyloxy group of the substrate is lower
than that of the hydroxy proton of the product. In
contrast, the newly designed reaction system maintains
the acidity of the substrate that is relatively high compared
to that of the product because of the influence of an
electron-withdrawing phosphono group. As a conse-
quence, protonation of carbanion D to regenerate a
Brønsted base or carbanion B can occur and reaction
should proceed catalytically. This report describes the
tandem rearrangement of phosphonoacetate derivatives
containing an allyloxy group in the presence of a catalytic
amount of a Brønsted base.
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Conditionsa
entry
base (mol %)
solvent
DMF
temp
yield (%)b
1
tBuOK (10)
LHMDS (10)
Cs2CO3 (10)
P4-tBu (10)
P2-tBu (10)
P1-tBu (20)
TBD (20)
90 °C
90 °C
90 °C
90 °C
90 °C
90 °C
90 °C
90 °C
rt
89 (86)
81
2
DMF
3
DMF
(86)
82 (81)
88 (85)
32
4
DMF
5
DMF
6
DMF
7
DMF
34
8
DBU (20)
DMF
14
9
tBuOK (10)
P2-tBu (10)
tBuOK (10)
tBuOK (10)
tBuOK (10)
tBuOK (10)
tBuOK (10)
DMF
(93)
(86)
(86)
75
10
11
12
13
14
15
DMF
rt
DMSO
THF
rt
rt
1,4-dioxane
toluene
tBuOH
rt
52
rt
0
rt
0
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.10 mmol), base (0.010ꢀ0.020 mmol),
solvent (1.0 mL), 90 °C or rt, 12 h. b NMR yields of 2a. CHBr3 was used
as an internal standard. Isolated yields are in parentheses.
Scheme 1. Proposed Catalytic System
inorganic bases as well as organic bases (entries 2ꢀ8).
Among them, inorganic bases, such as LHMDS and
Cs2CO3, and phosphazene bases P2-tBu and P4-tBu,
which are organosuperbases, provided 2a in good yield.
With these bases, tBuOK and P2-tBu, the reaction pro-
ceeded smoothly even at room temperature (entries 9 and 10).
Next, the effect of solvents was investigated with tBuOK
at room temperature (entries 11ꢀ15). The result indicated
that aprotic polar solvents such as DMF and DMSO
proved to be the solvents of choice (entries 9 and 11),
whereas ethereal solvents were less effective (entries 12
and 13). The use of toluene and tBuOH did not provide
any product, and 1a was completely recovered (entries 14
and 15).
With the optimized conditions in hand, the scope of the
substrates was investigated (Scheme 2).8 Substrates posses-
sing a variety of substitution patterns involving an allyloxy
group were subjected to the reaction conditions. Reactions
of 1b and 1c, which have a trans-1,2-disubstituted alkene
moiety, proceeded to provide the corresponding products
2b and 2c, respectively, in good yield with moderate
diastereoselectivity. The cis-alkene 1d gave a result similar
to that of trans-alkene 1c. A methallyloxy-substituted 1e
also underwent the reaction to afford 2e in good yield.
Next, the substrates containing substituents at the allylic
To ascertain the viability of the proposed tandem re-
arrangement, we attempted the reaction of ethyl 2-ally-
loxy-2-diethylphosphonoacetate (1a) as the primary
substrate. An initial experiment was performed using 10
mol % of tBuOK in DMF at 90 °C for 12 h. Delightfully,
the envisioned tandem rearrangement proceeded catalyti-
cally to afford 2a in 89% NMR yield and 86% isolated
yield (Table 1, entry 1). This preliminary result prompted
us to a further screening of Brønsted bases, including
(7) For selected examples, see: (a) Bausch, C. C.; Johnson, J. S. Adv.
€
:
ꢀ
Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 1207. (b) Demir, A. S.; Reis, O.; Igdir, A. C-.;
:
€
Esiringu, I.; Eymur, S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10584. (c) Demir, A. S.;
€
Reis, B.; Reis, O.; Eymur, S.; Gollu, M.; Tural, S.; Saglam, G. J. Org.
€
€ €
€
€
€ €
Chem. 2007, 72, 7439. (d) Demir, A. S.; Esiringu, I.; Gollu, M.; Reis, O.
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 2197. (e) El Kaım, L.; Gaultier, L.; Grimaud, L.;
Dos Santos, A. Synlett 2005, 2335. (f) Hayashi, M.; Nakamura, S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2249. (g) Corbett, M. T.; Uraguchi, D.;
Ooi, T.; Johnson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 4685.
(8) The reaction was conducted at 90 °C because the reaction of the
substrates possessing substituent(s) on the allyloxy moiety was very slow
at room temperature.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 17, 2013
4569