Y.-Y. Cheng et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 5223–5227
5225
Table 2
moderate cytotoxicity compared with 2PQ-1. Compound 6d with
an additional hydroxy group at the C-ring 5-position exhibited
only weak activity. Based on the structures of active compounds
2PQ-1ꢀ4, we also synthesized compounds with a 3-hydroxy-5-
alkoxyphenyl C-ring (6e–f) and changed the A-ring substitution
from 6,7-methylenedioxy to 6-pyrrolidinyl (6g–i), 6-morpholinyl
(6j), and 6-dimethylamino (6k). These seven compounds (6e–k)
showed the highest cytotoxicity against the HL-60 cancer cell line.
With hydroxy and methoxy groups on the C-ring, the rank order of
HL-60 inhibitory activity was 6-pyrrolidinyl (6h) > 6-dimethyl-
Inhibition of in vitro tumor cell growth by compound 6ha
b
d
Cell linee
logGI50
logTGIc
logLC50
SR
<ꢁ8.00
<ꢁ8.00
ꢁ7.27
ꢁ6.96
ꢁ7.52
ꢁ8.00
ꢁ7.61
ꢁ7.63
ꢁ7.21
ꢁ7.63
ꢁ7.39
ꢁ7.51
ꢁ6.58
>ꢁ4.00
<ꢁ8.00
ꢁ6.66
ꢁ4.95
ꢁ4.80
ꢁ7.53
ꢁ7.18
ꢁ7.05
ꢁ6.29
ꢁ4.60
ꢁ4.62
ꢁ6.59
ꢁ5.70
>ꢁ4.00
ꢁ5.41
NCI-H522
Colo205
SF-295
f
—
>ꢁ4.00
M14
>ꢁ4.00
f
MDA-MB-435
SK-MEL-5
OVCAR-3
NCI/ADR-RES
SK-OV-3
RXF 393
DU-145
—
ꢁ6.31
ꢁ5.19
>ꢁ4.00
>ꢁ4.00
>ꢁ4.00
>ꢁ4.00
>ꢁ4.00
amino (6k) > 6,7-methylenedioxy (6e) > 6-morpholinyl (6j).
A
change from 50-methoxy (6h) to 50-ethoxy (6i) significantly
increased anti-proliferative activity, but replacement with 50-hy-
droxy (6g) decreased activity significantly, as also seen with 6e
versus 6d. While 6i was more potent than 6h, unfortunately, 6i
also exhibited unsatisfactory toxicity against the Detroit 551 cell
line. Therefore, among compounds 6a–k, we selected6h as the lead
compound for further investigation, and submitted it to NCI for
anticancer evaluation.
MDA-MB-468
a
Data obtained from NCI0s in vitro disease-oriented human tumor cells screen.
Log concentrations that reduced cell growth to 50% of level at start of
b
experiment.
c
Log concentrations that caused total growth inhibition.
d
Log concentrations that
population.
a given compound required to kill 50% of a test
The resulting activity profile fingerprint (Table 2 and Supple-
mentary data) of 6h against the NCI-60 human cancer cell line
panel indicated significant inhibitory activity against a variety of
cancer cell lines. Compound 6h was particularly active against SR
leukemia (logGI50 <ꢁ8.00), MDA-MB-435 melanoma (logGI50
<ꢁ8.00), and NCI-H522 non-small cell lung cancer (logTGI
<ꢁ8.00) cell lines. We also evaluated the potency of 6h in an
anti-proliferation assay with NCI-H522 cells. MTT assay results
showed that 6h effectively inhibited proliferation of NCI-H522
cells with an IC50 value of 42.3 1.2 nM at 48 h-incubation. The
activity profile fingerprint of 6h was further analyzed by COMPARE
correlation at the GI50 level. As shown in Table 3, the fingerprint of
6h correlated most closely with that of antimitotic Vinca alkaloids,
such as vincristine and vinblastine. To support this supposition, we
examined whether 6h has an effect on tubulin assembly. In an
in vitro tubulin polymerization assay, 6h inhibited tubulin poly-
merization in a concentration-dependent manner, which was sim-
ilar to the effects caused by vincristine and vinblastine (Fig. 1A).24
Results from an in vivo tubulin assembly assay showed that
e
SR, leukemia; NCI-H522, non-small cell lung cancer; Colo205, colon cancer; SF-
295, CNS cancer; M14, MDA-MB-435, SK-MEL-5, melanoma, M14; OVCAR-3, NCI/
ADR-RES, SK-OV-3, ovarian cancer; RXF 393, renal cancer; DU-145, prostate cancer;
MDA-MB-468, breast cancer cell lines.
f
‘—’ no data.
possible hydrophilic prodrug derivatization. This report describes
the chemical synthesis, antitumor activity screening in vitro, and
mechanism of action of the new series of 6- (or 6,7-) substituted
2-(hydroxyl substituted phenyl)quinolin-4-ones (6a–k).
The synthesis of target compounds 6a–k is illustrated in
Scheme 1. As shown, variously substituted benzoic acids (1a–f)
were chlorinated with thionyl chloride to afford compounds 2a–
f.18 Without purification, 2a–f were reacted with o-aminoacetoph-
enones (3a–d)2,3 to give the desired amides (4a–k),19 which were
then cyclized in the presence of basic dioxane solution to yield
5a–k.20 Catalytic hydrogenolysis of 5a–k with palladium on active
charcoal gave the final compounds, 6- (or 6,7-) substituted
2-(hydroxyphenyl)quinolin-4-ones (6a–k).21 The spectroscopic
data (1H, 13C NMr and HR-ESIMS) were consistent with the pro-
posed structures.
The newly synthesized compounds were screened for antipro-
liferative activity against HL-60 leukemia, Hep3B hepatoma, NCI-
H460 non-small cell lung cancer, and Detroit 551 human skin
fibroblast cells.22,23 The results are given in Table 1. Among the
three mono-hydroxy derivatives (6a–c), 6b with meta-hydroxy
substitution was the most potent (Table1), but showed only
6h inhibited
a-tubulin and b-tubulin accumulation concentra-
tion-dependently in the cytoskeletal fraction, the same effect as
vincristine and vinblastine, whereas paclitaxel caused tubulin
polymerization (Fig. 1B).25 Thus, the preliminary results indicated
that the mechanism of action of 6h resembles that of vincristine
and vinblastine (Fig. 2).
In summary, 6- (or 6,7-) substituted 2-(hydroxyl substituted
phenyl)quinolin-4-one derivatives were designed, synthesized,
and evaluated for in vitro antitumor activity. Preliminary SAR
correlations of the new analogs were established. The most prom-
ising compound 6h demonstrated low toxicity against a normal
cell line and significant inhibition against several cancer cell lines.
In addition, the results of a COMPARE analysis suggested that 6h
might function as an antimitotic agent, such as Vinca alkaloids.
Therefore, we believe that 6h is a promising lead compound that
deserves further optimization and derivatization as a hydrophilic
prodrug.
Table 3
Results of COMPARE correlations at GI50 level for compound 6h
Rank
Compound (NCI number)
ra
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Vincristine sulfate (NSC 67574)
Maytansine (NSC 153858)
Vinblastine sulfate (NSC 49842)
Rhizoxin (NSC 332598)
DON (NSC 7365)
Didemnin B (NSC 325319)
AT-125 (NSC 163501)
S-Trityl-L-cysteine (NSC 83265)
0.538
0.497
0.489
0.476
0.452
0.450
0.442
0.421
0.402
0.401
Acknowledgments
The investigation was supported by research grants from the
National Science Council of the Republic of China awarded to
S.C.K. (NSC101-2320-B-039-008). Thanks are also due to support
by Grant CA177584from the National Cancer Institute, NIH
awarded to K.H.L.
Tiazofurin (NSC 286193)
Trimetrexate (NSC 352122)
a
r = correlation coefficient.