5786
Z. Chen et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 5785–5787
Table 1
Table 2
Optimization of the intermolecular aryne ene reaction of olefinsa
Substrate scope for the intermolecular aryne ene reaction of olefinsa
OTf
CsF
+
TMS
Entry
1
Olefin
Product
Yieldb (%)
80
12 h
1a
1b
1c
1c
1b
2b
Entry
Molar ratio of 1a/1b/CsF
Temp (°C)
Solvent
1c
b
yield (%)
2
3
85
86
2c
3c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1/1/1
2/1/1
3/1/1
1/2/1
1/3/1
1/4/1
1/4/2
1/4/3
1/4/4
1/4/4
1/4/4
1/4/4
1/4/4
1/4/4
1/4/4
1/4/4
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
50
70
90
110
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
THF
25
21
15
28
33
36
56
76
80
NRc
NRc
NRc
71
55
50
37
3b
4
77
4c
4b
5b
DCM
Dioxane
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
5
6
7
75
80
73
5c
6c
6b
7b
a
b
c
Reactions performed on 0.5 mmol scale, 5 mL of the solvent.
Isolated yield.
NR: no reaction.
7c
(Table 1, entry (1). Fortunately, the target molecule 3-phenyl-
cyclohexene (1c) was obtained in yield of 25%. Subsequently, we
tried to change the molar ratio of reactants. As can be observed
in Table 1, the decreasing yields were observed along with the
increasing of 1a from 1.0 equiv to 2.0 or 3.0 equiv under the same
condition. Simultaneously, a further Aldel-ene reaction between
excessive benzyne and product 1c was observed, to generate more
than once ene reaction products. Unfortunately, the reaction sys-
tem was so intricate that we could not obtain pure multiple ene
reaction products. Next, a higher yield (36%) was obtained when
the 4.0 equiv cyclohexene was used (Table 1, entries 4–6) com-
pared with entry 1. From these reactions, we found that 1) the
amount of benzyne is less than olefins; 2) the amount of cyclohex-
ene can obviously affect the yield of reaction. Subsequently, further
investigation was performed by changing the amount of CsF (en-
tries 7–9). An inspiring result that the yields were increasing along
with the increasing amount of CsF was observed, and the highest
yield of 80% can be afforded when 4.0 equiv were used in this sys-
tem, which indicated that a large amount of cesium fluoride is
8
9
75
76
8b
8c
9c
9b
10
88
10b
10c
a
Reaction conditions: o-(trimethylsilyl)aryl triflate (1.0 equiv, 1.0 mmol), olefin
(4.0 equiv), CsF (4.0 equiv), CH3CN, 25 °C, 12 h.
b
Isolated yields.
be compatible with this reaction and obtain products with rela-
tively good yields (73–80%, entries 5–8). Besides, 1-phenylcyclo-
hexene 9b, as a kind of substituted cyclic olefin, exhibited good
reactivity and afforded the expected ene reaction product in yield
of 76% (entry 9). It was worth noting that the perfect regioselectiv-
ity was observed with forming only a type of ene reaction product
when we used 2-methyl-2-butene 8b (entry 8) or 1-phenyl-
cyclohexene 9b (entry 9) as the reaction substrate. Finally, we
made use of 1,5-cyclooctadiene 10b, a type of dialkene, as the
substrate to test the reaction, and we were surprised to realize that
intermolecular ene reaction occurred at two olefin function groups
to provide product 10c in yield of 88% (entry 10). Furthermore, we
still gained the same product 10c when the benzyne precursor 1a
was excess.
In addition to the o-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl triflate 1a, other
substituted aryne precursors could undergo the intermolecular ar-
yne ene reaction of olefins in this methodology favorably as well
(Table 3). The 4,5-dimethylbenzyne precursor 2a, and the 1,3-ben-
zodioxole derivative 3a have all been examined under our optimal
condition. They formed the expected ene reaction products 11c,
12c, 13c, and 14c, respectively with yields ranging from 70–74%
indispensable. From these investigations, we found that
a
1:4:4 M ratio of the reactants 1a, 1b, and cesium fluoride was
the best stoichiometric ratio.
Subsequent studies focused on the effects of solvent and tem-
perature. From entries 10–12, the reaction can not work when
THF, dichloromethane, and dioxane were utilized as solvents.
Meanwhile, we also found that higher temperature will result in
the decrease of yields. According to the above studies, the best re-
sult (80% yield of 3-phenylcyclohexene 1c) was obtained by using
1a (1.0 equiv), 4.0 equiv of 1b, 4.0 equiv of CsF, 15 mL of acetoni-
trile at 25 °C for 12 h.
Followed the optimized condition, we then tested the scope of
this reaction using a variety of cyclic olefins and alkyl-olefins (Ta-
ble 2). It was found, except for cyclohexene, substrates of other
cyclic olefins, including cyclopentene 2b, cycloheptene 3b, and
cyclooctene 4b, could also occur this reaction smoothly in yields
ranging from 77% to 86% (entries 2–4). Additionally, under opti-
mized reaction conditions, the substituted chain olefins, including
methylene-cyclopentane 5b, 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene 6b, 2,3,3-
trimethylbutene 7b, and 2-methyl-2-butene 8b, were also able to