ORGANOCATALYTIC DIRECT DOUBLE ALDOL REACTION
detection: 254 nm, tR 12.73min (chiral, major), tR 13.97min (chiral, minor),
R 15.9 min (meso).
Daicel Chiralpak AD column, eluent: 9:1 Hex/IPA; 0.8 mL/min flow
rate, detection: 225.8 nm, tR 12.71 min (chiral, minor), tR 54.14 min
(chiral, major).
Data for meso product: 7.82 (d, 2H, J = 6 Hz), 7.66 (d, 2H, J = 6 Hz),
7.51-7.18 (m, 13H), 7.04 (t, 2H, J = 9 Hz), 6.61 (d, 2H, J = 6 Hz), 5.11
(br, 1H), 2.00 (s, 6H).
t
3-acetoxy-2-(10-acetoxy-10-(4-methoxyphenyl)methyl)-1-phenyl-3-
(4-methoxyphenyl)-propan-1-one (Table 2, entry 5). This product
was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel with a 8:2
hexane/ethyl acetate mixture as eluent. The purification afforded a mix-
ture of chiral and meso adducts.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The reaction between 1 mol/eq. of acetophenone and
2.2 mol/eq. of benzaldehyde was first investigated in the
presence of stoichiometric amounts of SiCl4 and a catalytic
amount of enantiomerically pure (S)-Tetra-Me-BITIOPO
(0.1 mol/eq.) (Scheme 1). At the end of reaction the
quenching and the work up with NH4Cl sat.sol. allowed
isolating the product as a mixture of diastereoisomers, as
clearly indicated by 1H NMR of the crude reaction mix-
ture; however, any attempt to purify the 1,3 diol led to de-
composition and low isolation yields.22 Therefore, the
crude products were reacted with acetic anhydride to af-
ford the corresponding diacetate derivatives, which were
obtained as pure compounds and properly analysed and
characterized.23
Different experimental conditions of solvent, temperature,
and stoichiometric ratios were screened in order to optimize
the performance of the Lewis base; a few selected results
are shown in Table 1. At –40ꢀC in DCM the reaction was
found to proceed after 20 h in 35% yield, 86/14 ratio between
the chiral isomer 3a and the achiral species 3b, with 55% e.e.
for the major isomer (it must be noted that 3b is an achiral
molecule that may exist in two diastereoisomers because
carbon in a to carbonyl group is an achirotopic stereogenic
center; however, NMR showed one set of signals only and
by HPLC analysis one peak was detected under many
attempted conditions). For sake of comparison the reaction
was performed under the same experimental conditions
with (S)-BINAPO as a chiral catalyst: the product was
obtained in comparable yields and stereoselectivities. The
use of trichlorosilyl triflate did not bring any improvement
to the process. It was also observed that the experimental
conditions of the reaction work up strongly influenced the
level of the enantioselectivity of the isolated products: it was
found that quenching with ammonium chloride gave best
results and it allowed to obtain the 1,3 diacetate 3a as major
product in good yield, 88/12 diastereoisomeric ratio and
higher enantioselectivities, up to 75% e.e. (entry 5 of Table 1).
In the attempt to improve the stereoselectivity the reaction
temperature was further lowered to –78ꢀC; as expected,
the condensation was promoted in lower yield but without
any appreciable increase of the enantioselectivity. Therefore,
it was decided to further explore the general scope of the
methodology by performing the reaction at –40ꢀC for
20 hours in the presence of 10% mol amount of (S)-BITIOPO.
At first the acetophenone reaction with differently substituted
aromatic aldehydes was investigated (see Scheme 2): the
results are collected in Table 2.
Rf ¼ 0:13ð8 : 2 hexane=ethyl acetateÞ:
Data for a chiral/meso mixture: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 7.72 (d,
2H, J = 9 Hz, meso), 7.59 (d, 2H, J = 6 Hz, chiral), 7.53-7.28 (m, 5H chi-
ral + 5H meso), 7.18-7.10 (m, 2H chiral + 2H meso), 6.85-6.68 (m, 4H
chiral + 4H meso) 6.26 (d, 1H, J = 6 Hz, chiral), 6.16 (d, 1H, J = 9 Hz, chi-
ral), 5.96 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, meso), 4.69 (dd, 1H, J = 9 Hz, 10.5Hz, chiral)
4.49 (t, 1H, J = 9 Hz, meso), 3.79 (s, 3H, chiral), 3.76 (s, 6H, meso), 3.71
(s, 3H, chiral), 1.92 (s, 3H, chiral), 1.73 (s, 3H, chiral), 1.66 (s, 6H,
meso). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 195.84, 169.53, 159.55, 138.62,
132.63, 130.22, 129.56, 129.06, 128.76, 128.30, 128.17, 128.11, 127.87,
113.86, 113.59, 74.82, 73.86, 56.33, 55.29, 55.13, 20.89. HRMS Mass
(ESI+): m/z = calc for C28H28O7Na+ = 499.17, found 499.3 [M + Na].
The e.e was determined by chiral HPLC with a Daicel Chiralpak AD
column, eluent: 8:2 Hex/IPA; 0.8 mL/min flow rate, detection: 225 nm,
tR 13.86 min (chiral, minor), tR 20.59 min (chiral, major), tR 30.22 min
(meso).
3-acetoxy-2-(10-acetoxy-10-(4-methylphenyl)methyl)-1-phenyl-3-
(4-methylphenyl)-propan-1-one (Table 2, entry 6). This product
was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel with a 9:1
hexane/ethyl acetate mixture as eluent. The purification afforded a
mixture of chiral and meso adducts.
Rf ¼ 0:4ð8 : 2 hexane=ethyl acetateÞ:
Data for a chiral/meso mixture: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 7.63 (d,
2H, J = 6 Hz, meso), 7.51 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz, chiral), 7.46-7.21 (m, 5H chi-
ral + 5H meso), 7.11-6.92 (m, 6H, chiral + 6H meso), 6.24 (d, 1H,
J = 9 Hz, chiral), 6.14 (d, 1H, J = 9 Hz, chiral), 5.92 (d, 2H, J = 6 Hz,
meso) 4.65 (dd, 1H, J = 10.5Hz, J = 9 Hz, chiral), 4.44 (t, 1H, J = 6 Hz,
meso), 2.26 (s, 3H, chiral), 2.25 (s, 6H, meso), 2.18 (s, 3H, chiral),
1.90 (s, 3H, chiral), 1.69 (s, 3H, chiral), 1.26 (s, 6H, meso).
13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 198.70, 169.48, 169.37, 138.63, 138.08,
135.15, 134.53, 132.51, 129.07, 128.88, 128.08, 127.90, 127.65, 127.31,
126.83, 74.97, 74.02, 55.65, 21.05, 20.89. HRMS Mass (ESI+): m/z =
calc for C28H28O5Na+ = 467.18, found 467.18 [M + Na].
The e.e. was determined by chiral HPLC with a Daicel Chiralpak AD col-
umn, eluent: 95:5 Hex/IPA; 0.8 mL/min flow rate, detection: 225nm, tR
18.62min (chiral, minor), tR 44.06 min (chiral, major), tR 50.69min (meso).
3-acetoxy-2-(10-acetoxy-10-(1-naphthyl)methyl)-1-phenyl-3-(1-naph
thyl)-propan-1-one (Table 2, entry 7). This product was purified by
flash column chromatography on silica gel with a 9:1 hexane/ethyl
acetate mixture as eluent.
Rf ¼ 0:4ð8 : 2 hexane=ethyl acetateÞ:
Data for chiral product: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 8.50 (d, 1H,
J = 6 Hz), 8.40 (d, 1H, J = 6 Hz), 7.83 (d, 1H, J = 9 Hz), 7.74-7.68 (m,
2H), 7.67-7.45 (m, 6H), 7.40-7.20 (m, 4H), 7.18-7.12 (m, 2H), 6.99 (d,
2H, J = 6 Hz), 6.87 (d, 2H, J = 6 Hz), 5.27 (dd, 1H, J = 9 Hz, J = 3Hz),
2.15 (s, 3H), 1.76 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 197.53,
168.51, 138.40, 133.85, 133.10, 132.48, 130.24, 129.09, 127.90, 127.52,
126.41, 125.69, 125.25, 124.89, 122.90, 53.32, 20.90.
Generally speaking, aldehydes bearing electron-withdrawing
groups reacted with acetophenone in higher yields than
benzaldehyde, while electron-rich aldehydes were less
reactive; however, the opposite trend was observed for the
enantioselectivity.
Indeed, while the diastereoselectivity seems not to be
influenced by electronic characteristics of the substrates,
enantioselectivities ranging from 80–91% were obtained
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir
HRMS Mass (ESI+): m/z = calc for C28H28O5Na+ = 467.18, found
467.18 [M + Na].The e.e. was determined by chiral HPLC with a