the reactions proceeded smoothly to give the corresponding
products in high yield with 100 % selectivity under the defined
W irradiation conditions. The high catalytic activity of 2 for
benzaldehyde, 4-chlorobenzaldehyde, 4-nitrobenzaldehyde, 3-
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Inha University Research Grant
(2017)
nitrobenzaldehyde,
hydroxybenzaldehyde,
4-hydroxybenzaldehyde,
4-methylbenzaldehyde,
3-
4-
Supplementary Material
and
methoxylbenzaldehyde with malononitrile was still maintained in
ethanol (Table 2, entries 2-9). The electron withdrawing groups
(EWG) somewhat reduced the reaction time (Table 2, entries 3-5)
as compared to the electron donating groups (EDG) (Table 2,
entries 6-9).
Experimental details, TGA, XPS, pore volume vs diameter
graphs, N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and comparison table.
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) to this article can be
In further studies, extension of the scope of the Knoevenagel
condensations catalyzed by
2 was explored to various
aldehyde/ketone derivatives with ethyl cyanoacetate under µW-
irradiation. Interestingly, the reaction of benzaldehyde with ethyl
cyanoacetate proceeded smoothly to provide the corresponding
product in high yield, 97% (Table 2, entry 10). The substrates with
EWGs, such as 4-chlorobenzaldehyde, 1-(4-
chlorophenyl)ethanone,
4-nitrobenzaldehyde,
1-(4-
nitrophenyl)ethanone, 1-(4-bromophenyl)ethanone (Table 2,
entries 11-15), along with the derivatives of EDGs, such as 4-
hydroxybenzaldehyde (Table 2, entry 16) showed satisfactory
yields up to 94% and EWGs gave the products in shorter time as
compared to the EDGs. Furthermore, a variety of aromatic ketones
also performed well to give the corresponding yields, affording up
to 92% isolated yields by µW conditions (Table 2, entries 12, 14
and 15). These results were consistent with our hypothesis and
suggested that the amine moieties together with structure of MOF
can facilitate the formation of product for EWG/EDG substituents,
thus enhancing the catalytic reactivity as depicted in Fig. S1.
Moreover, EWGs along with EDGs promoted Knoevenagel
condensation efficiently, whereas dramatically reduced the
reaction time as compared to the conventional heating method
[23]. Importantly, these results reveal that the use of µW
irradiation into the catalysis leads to much higher rates within a
very short reaction time than those which are achieved in
conventional heating.
In order to further evaluate the catalyst’s reactivity, we also
compared catalyst 2 with some catalysts reported in the literature
for the Knoevenagel condensation under µW irradiation.
Interestingly, as shown in Table S1 (ESI), catalyst 2 (Table S1,
entry 1) has many advantages over reported catalysts. Importantly,
the high activity of catalyst 2 would be due to basicity, pore
structure, thermal stability, surface functionality along with
coordinatively unsaturated metal site of the MOF framework (Fig.
1c, and Fig. S2-S6; ESI) [21, 22].
Fig.
1 Knoevenagel condensation of benzaldehyde with malononitrile
catalysed by 2 (a) different catalyst loading, (b) in different solvents, and (d)
recyclability test; in all cases the reaction conditions are same as Table 2 (entry
2); (c) XRD patterns of catalyst 2 (fresh & after 5th run).
References
[1] M. Leonardi, M. Villacampa, J. C. Menéndez, Chem. Sci., 2018, 9, 2042-
2064.
[2] G.-J. Ding, Y.-J. Zhu, C. Qi, B.-Q. Lu, F. Chen, J. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. B,
2015, 3, 1823–1830.
[3] Microwaves in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; De La Hoz, A., Loupy, A., Eds.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2013.
[4] M. Henary, C. Kananda, L. Rotolo, B. Savino, E. A. Owens, G. Cravotto,
RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 14170-14197.
[5] M. Adamski, T. J. G. Skalski, S. Xu, M. Killer, E. M. Schibli, B. J. Frisken,
S. Holdcroft, Polym. Chem., 2019, 10, 1668-1685.
[6] T. V. Medeiros, J. Manioudakis, F. Noun, J.-R. Macairan, F. Victoria, R.
Naccache, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2019, 7, 7175-7195.
[7] M. Baghbanzadeh, L. Carbone, P. D. Cozzoli, C. O. Kappe, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 11312–11359.
[8] Y. Liu, Y. Nie, X. Lu, X. Zhang, H. He, F Pan, L. Zhou, X. Liu, X. J, S.
Zhang, Green Chem., 2019, 21, 3499-3535.
[9] Ü. Yılmaz, H. Küçükbay, S. Deniz, N. Şireci, Molecules, 2013, 18, 2501-
2517.
We further turn our attention to reusability test of our catalyst 2
under µW irradiation. The recycling of the catalyst was examined
by the coupling of benzaldehyde with malononitrile (Fig 1d).
Interestingly, it was observed that very similar yields (100-98 %)
with 100 % selectivity were obtained by carrying on five
consecutive runs without any significant loss of catalytic activity.
Significantly, the XRD patterns of catalyst 2 after 5th run was
indistinguishable from those of the fresh one (Fig. 1c). It is
suggested that no structural decomposition of the catalyst had
occurred after the catalytic reaction and filtration.
[10] J. W. Liu, L. F. Chen, H. Cui, J. Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, C. Y. Su, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2014, 43, 6011.
[11] Y. Hu, J. Zhang, H. Huo, Z. Wang, X. Xu, Y. Yang, K. Lin, R. Fan, Catal.
Sci. Technol., 2020,10, 315-322.
In summary, catalyst 2 demonstrated remarkable activity for
Knoevenagel condensation of various aromatic aldehydes and
ketones under µWave irradiation conditions. Importantly, the
reactions proceeded very quickly with high yields compared to
conventional heating methods. Moreover, the catalyst 2 could be
reused several times without further processing. More importantly,
this method offers a very simple, fast, efficient, energy saving as
well as easy way for the synthesis of a large number of important
organic molecules. We believe that our present study will inspire
the catalytic engineering in the field of organic synthesis.
[12] X. Feng, C. Xu, Z.-Q. Wang, S.-F. Tang, W.-J. Fu, B.-M. Ji, and L.-Y.
Wang, Inorg. Chem., 2015, 54, 2088.
[13] Knoevenage, E. Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft, 1894,
2(27), 2345.
[14] Jones, G. Organic Reactions, 1967, 15, 204.
[15] Z. Wang, X. Yuan, Q. Cheng, T. Zhang, J. Luo, New J. Chem., 2018, 42,
11610-11615.
[16] S. Zhao, X. Wang, L. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 11691-11696.
[17] (a) U.R. Pratap, D.V. Jawale, R.A. Waghmare, D.L. Lingampalle, R.A.
Mane, New J. Chem. 2011, 35(1), 49; (b) C. Wang, Z. Guan, Y. He, Green
Chem. 2011, 13(8): 2048.