508
V.S. Patil et al. / Dyes and Pigments 98 (2013) 507e517
on Finnigan Mass spectrometer (EI). The visible absorption spectra
of the compounds were recorded on a Spectronic Genesys 2 UVe
visible spectrometer. DSC-TGA measurements were performed on
SDT Q 600 v8.2 Build 100 model of TA instruments Waters (India)
Pvt. Ltd.
in ethanol) and for long wavelength emission fluorescein (
10% NaOH) was used.
F
¼ 0.91
2.4. Synthesis of (1H-benzo[d]thiazole-2-yl) benzene-1,3-diol (3)
2,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid 1 (10 g, 64.9 mmol), and o-amino
thiophenol 2 (7.07 g, 64.9 mmol) were mixed in polyphosphoric
acid (121.94 g). The mixture was stirred at 250 ꢁC for 4 h and then it
was allowed to cool to room temperature, poured into 1200 ml ice-
cold water with continuous stirring. A dark brown precipitate was
obtained. It was filtered and dissolved in a cold solution of 10%
Na2CO3 (140 mL) acidified with 10% HCl (40 mL) up to pH 2 at 10 ꢁC.
This solution was kept overnight at 0 ꢁC to give 3 with good yield
(Scheme 1).
2.2. Computational methods
The different fluorescein analogues 5ae5e were studied to
find out the effect of electron donor and acceptor on the rate of
excited state intramolecular proton transfer, electronic state and
energy level by ab initio computational methods. The ground
state geometry of the compounds 5ae5e in their Cs symmetry
were optimized using the tight criteria in the gas phase using DFT
[21]. The functional used was B3LYP. The B3LYP functional com-
bines Becke’s three parameter exchange functional (B3) [22] with
the nonlocal correlation functional by Lee, Yang and Parr (LYP)
[23]. The basis set used for all atoms was 6-31G(d) [24]. The
vibrational frequencies at the optimized structures were
computed using the same method to verify that the optimized
structures correspond to local minima on the energy surface. The
vertical excitation energies of the groundestate equilibrium ge-
ometries were calculated with TD-DFT [25]. The low-lying first
singlet excited state (S1) of each conformer was relaxed using the
TD-DFT to obtain its minimum energy geometry. The difference
between the energies of the optimized geometries in the first
singlet excited state and the ground state was used in computing
the emissions [26]. Frequency computations were also carried out
on Frank-Condon excited state of the conformers. All the com-
putations in solvents of different polarities were carried out using
the Polarizable Continuum Model (PCM) [27]. The electronic
structure computations were carried out using the Gaussian 09
program [28].
Yield: 61%, Melting point > 300 ꢁC.
1H NMR (CD3)2SO:
d
6.25 (m, 2H), 6.82 (d, H, J ¼ 9.3), 6.95 (d, H,
J ¼ 9.3), 7.59 (d, H, J ¼ 9.3), 7.82 (m, 2H, J ¼ 6.8, 7.4). 10.60 (s, 2H)
IR ( KBr: cmꢂ1) : 3341 (phenolic OeH stretching), 1696 (amide
C]O), 1651 (imine C]N), 1583 (aromatic C]C), 1501, 1448, 1422,
1215 (phenol CeO) cmꢂ1
.
MS m/z: 243 (Mþ), 244 (M þ 1).
2.5. General synthesis of fluorescein derivatives 5ae5e
2-(20,40-Dihydroxyphenyl) benzthiazole 3 (88 mmol) was mixed
with anhydrides 4ae4e (44 mmol) in H2SO4 at 160 ꢁC for 4 h and
was allowed to cool to room temperature. The reaction mixture was
poured into 100 ml ice-cold water and stirred for 15 min. The
precipitated product was filtered, and washed with cold water
(25 ml). The crude product was purified by dissolving into 10%
Na2CO3 solution (50 ml) and acidified with 10% HCl (13 mL) up to
pH 2 to give 5a to 5e (Scheme 2).
2.5.1. 20,70-Di(1H-benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-30,60-dihydroxy-3H-spiro
[isobenzofuran-1-90-xanthen]-3-one (5a)
2.3. Relative quantum yield calculations
Yield: 52%, Melting point > 300 ꢁC.
Quantum yield of the synthesized compounds in water were
calculated by using anthracene and fluorescein as reference stan-
dards using the comparative method [29]. The absorption and
emission characteristics of the standards and the compounds were
measured at different concentrations at (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 ppm
level). The emission intensity values were plotted against the
absorbance values and linear plots were obtained. Gradients were
calculated for compounds in each solvent and for the standards. All
the measurements were done by keeping the parameters constant
such as solvent and slit width. The relative quantum yields of the
synthesized compounds in different solvents were calculated by
using the equation (1) [29]
1H NMR (DMSO- d6, 400 MHz):
d 6.35 (s, 2H), 6.93 (s, 2H), 7.51
(s, 2H), 7.63 (m, 4H, J ¼ 10.1, 9.7), 7.68 (m, 2H, J ¼ 10.1, 9.7), 7.71 (m,
2H, J ¼ 10.1, 9.7), 7.79 (m, 2H, J ¼ 11.2, 8.8), 7.93 (m, 2H, J ¼ 11.2, 8.8),
8.07 (m, 2H, J ¼ 11.2, 8.8).
FT-IR (KBr: cmL1): 3417 (OeH), 3315 (NeH), 1758 (lactone C]
O), 1731 (lactone C]O), 1689 (amide C]O), 1638 (C]N), 1578
(aromatic C]C),1541 (aromatic), 1515, 1441, 1402, 1319 (CeN), 1243
(phenol CeO), 1191 (lactone CeO), 1134 (ether linkage) cmꢂ1
Mass: m/z: 598 (Mþ), 599 (M þ 1).
2.5.2. 20,70-Di(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-30,60-dihydroxy-3H-spiro
[furan-2,90-xanthen]-5(4H)-one (5b)
Yield: 48%, Melting point > 300 ꢁC.
Gradx h2x
Gradst
fx
¼
Fst
ꢀ
ꢀ
(1)
1H NMR (DMSO- d6, 400 MHz): :
d
2.45 (d, 2H, J ¼ 6.4), 3.50 (d,
h2st
2H, J ¼ 6.4), 6.00 (s, 2H), 7.11 (d, 2H, J ¼ 9.9), 7.11 (d, 2H, J ¼ 9.9), 7.39
(d, 2H, J ¼ 8.9) 7.67 (m, 4H, J ¼ 9.9), 7.79 (s, 2H), 7.97 (s, 2H).
FT-IR (KBr: cmL1): 3310 (phenolic OeH stretching),
2963(aliphatic CeH), 2924(aliphatic CeH),1770 (lactoneC]O),1689
where:
Fx ¼ Quantum yield of compound
Fst ¼ Quantum yield of standard sample
Gradx ¼ Gradient of compound
Gradst ¼ Gradient of standard sample
hx ¼ Refractive index of solvent used for synthesized compound
hst ¼ Refractive index of solvent used for standard sample
N
COOH
H2N
HO
PPA
HO
S
+
Since the compound 5a and 5d have two emissions, the fluo-
rescence quantum efficiency at each of the emissions was calcu-
lated using a standard having similar emission at the respective
HO
OH
OH
1
2
3
wavelength (For short wavelength emission anthracene (
F
¼ 0.27
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (1H-benzo[d]thiazole-2-yl) benzene-1,3-diol 3.