J. Bae et al. / Dyes and Pigments 99 (2013) 748e752
749
new, structurally simple colorimetric probe based on the nitro-
benzoxadiazole (NBD) chromophore to achieve H2S signaling. The
hydrogen sulfide signaling is based on the reduction of the nitro
group of the NBD framework to amine expecting a significant change
in the absorption profile. We reasoned that reduction of the nitro
group into an amino group should induce a change in the electronic
properties and thus the absorption properties of the NBD moiety.
Based on this reasoning, we synthesized a series of NBD-derivatives
1e3 having oxygen, sulfur, and selenium atoms. Reduction of the
NBD nitro group resulted in a selective colorimetric signal toward the
hydrogen sulfide that was discernible by eye.
was stirred at room temperature for 2 h, and the precipitates were
filtered and washed with ethanol. The solid product was crystal-
lized from dichloromethane/hexane solution (1:1, v/v) and dried
under vacuum to give compound 3 (75% yield) as brown crystals;
mp: 135.0e135.4 ꢂC. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSOed6)
d 8.44 (d,
J ¼ 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.85e7.68 (m, 2H), 7.68e7.52 (m, 3H), 7.02 (d,
J ¼ 7.8 Hz, 1H); 13C (150 MHz, DMSOed6)
d 150.26, 142.99, 136.93,
134.19, 132.52, 131.16, 131.06, 127.71, 124.17; HRMS (FAB); m/z calcd
for C12H8N3O3Se [M þ H]þ: 321.9731, found 321.9728.
2.5. Time course plot of signaling
2. Experimental section
Time course of the H2S signaling of 1e3 was followed by
monitoring the absorbance of the measuring solution at 551 nm.
The concentrations of the probes 1e3 and H2S were 10 mM and
2.1. General
0.1 mM, respectively, in a mixture of DMSO and acetate buffer so-
lution (pH 4.8, 10 mM), (1:1, v/v).
NBDeCl (4-chloro-7-nitrobenzofurazan), benzeneselenol, thio-
phenol, phenol, and sodium sulfide were purchased from Aldrich
Chemical Co. All solvents were obtained from Aldrich Chemical
Co. as ‘spectroscopic grade’. 1H NMR (600 MHz) and 13C NMR
(150 MHz) spectra were measured on a Varian VNS spectrometer
and referenced to the residual solvent signal. UVeVis spectra were
recorded with a Jasco V-550 spectrophotometer equipped with a
Peltier temperature controller. Fluorescence spectra were
measured with a PTI QuantaMaster steady-state spectrofluorom-
eter. Mass spectra were obtained on a Micromass Autospec mass
spectrometer.
2.6. Detection limit
Detection limit for the signaling of H2S was estimated from the
concentration-dependent absorption spectra by plotting the
absorbance changes at 551 nm of 3 as a function of log[H2S]
following the reported procedure [35]. For the intermediate values
of the resulting sigmoidal plot, a linear regression curve was ob-
tained. The point at which this line crossed the ordinate axis was
taken as the detection limit.
2.2. Preparation of 1 [34]
2.7. pH effect on sulfide signaling
Phenol (0.28 g, 3.0 mmol) was added to a solution of NBDeCl
(0.20 g, 1.0 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL), after which triethylamine
(0.42 mL, 3.0 mmol) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 12 h, diluted with water and
extracted with dichloromethane. The organic layer was separated
and washed with water, and then evaporated. The crude product
was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, dichloro-
methane) to give compound 1 as an orange solid. The product was
crystallized from dichloromethane/hexane solution (1:1, v/v) to
give 1 (25% yield) as orange crystals; mp: 121.1e121.5 ꢂC (lit. mp:
The effects of pH on the sulfide signaling of 1e3 were tested by
using different buffer solutions. Sulfide signaling in the pH range
between 3.6 and 8.1 was measured (acetate buffer for 3.6 to 5.6,
hepes buffer for 7.1, and tris buffer for 8.1). Final concentrations of
probes 1e3, sulfide, and each buffer solution were 10 mM, 0.1 mM,
and 10 mM, respectively, under the same measurement conditions.
2.8. Hydrogen sulfide signaling for practical samples
Hydrogen sulfide signaling for tap water and simulated
wastewater samples was performed to confirm the practical ability
of the probe 3. The changes in the signaling of 3 for the ‘distilled
water’, ‘tap water’, and ‘simulated wastewater’ were measured as a
function of H2S concentrations. Stock solutions of hydrogen sulfide
(1.0 mM) were prepared in distilled water, tap water, and simu-
lated wastewater. Stock solution of 3 (5.0 ꢀ 10ꢁ4 M) in DMSO was
prepared. Acetate buffer solution (1.0 M) in distilled water, tap
water, and simulated wastewater was also prepared. Calculated
amounts of hydrogen sulfide, 3, and acetate buffer were added to a
vial and the resulting solution was diluted to 3.0 mL with DMSO
and distilled water, tap water, or simulated wastewater to make
121 ꢂC [34]). 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSOed6)
1H), 7.63e7.54 (m, 2H), 7.50e7.30 (m, 3H), 6.67 (d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz, 1H);
13C (150 MHz, DMSOed6)
153.75, 153.28, 145.86, 144.82, 136.02,
d
8.63 (d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz,
d
131.28, 130.68, 127.44, 121.30, 109.92; LRMS (FAB); m/z calcd for
C
12H8N3O4 [M þ H]þ: 258.1, found 258.1.
2.3. Preparation of 2 [34]
Thiophenol (0.33 g, 3.0 mmol) was added to a solution of NBDe
Cl (0.20 g, 1.0 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL). The reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 12 h, and the yellow precipitates
were filtered and washed with ethanol. The solid product was
crystallized from dichloromethane/hexane solution (1:1, v/v) and
dried under vacuum to give compound 2 (23% yield) as orange
crystals; mp: 157.5e158.0 ꢂC (lit. mp: 157e158 ꢂC [34]). 1H NMR
a
final composition of 1:1 (v/v). Final concentrations of 3
and acetate buffer were 1.0 ꢀ 10ꢁ5 M and 1.0 ꢀ 10ꢁ2 M,
(600 MHz, DMSOed6)
d
8.49 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.81e7.68 (m, 2H),
7.68e7.58 (m, 3H), 6.81 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz,1H); 13C (150 MHz, DMSOed6)
d
149.01, 143.27, 140.44, 135.74, 133.32, 132.99, 131.64, 131.23,
126.37, 123.77; LRMS (FAB); m/z calcd for C12H8N3O3S [M þ H]þ:
274.0, found 274.0.
2.4. Preparation of 3
Benzeneselenol (0.47 g, 3.0 mmol) was added to a solution of
NBDeCl (0.20 g, 1.0 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL). The reaction mixture
Scheme 1. Preparation of NBDebased H2S probes 1e3.