hydrophobic effects and hydrogen bonding are also possible,
depending on the structure of solutes.
In conclusion, we have described the separation of some
biologically important shape-constrained isomers on Sil-FIP in
a reversed-phase mode and compared them with commercially
available hydrophobized silicas such as monomeric and poly-
meric C18, and C30 phases. The newly developed molecular gel-
based material showed very high molecular shape selectivity by a
collection of interactions, depending on the structure of the
solute molecules. Application of a functional group-rich self-
assembled molecular gel in the science of molecular separation
will open the way to the solution of many of its challenges.
Dr Abul K. Mallik (ID# P10343) highly acknowledges the
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for providing
financial support to carry out this research. This work was also
supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and
Technology of Japan.
Fig. 2 Separation of tocopherols on (a) C18-mono, (b) C18-poly, (c) C30,
and (d) Sil-FIP phases. Mobile phase: methanol–water (9 : 1 for (a) to
(c) and 8 : 2 for (d)), column temperature 50 1C, flow rate:
1.0 ml minÀ1. UV detection: 285 nm.
Notes and references
1 (a) J. M. Gaziano, E. J. Johnson, R. M. Russell, J. E. Manson,
M. J. Stampfer, P. M. Ridker, B. Frei, C. H. Hennekens and
N. I. Krinsky, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 1995, 61, 1248;
(b) A. D. Hieber, T. J. King, S. Morioka, L. H. Fukushima,
A. A. Franke and J. S. Bertram, Nutr. Cancer, 2000, 37, 234;
(c) J. F. Landrier, E. Gouranton, E. Reboul, N. Cardinault,
C. E. Yazidi, C. M. Desmoulins, M. Andre, M. Nowicki,
M. Sauidi and P. Borel, J. Nutr. Biochem., 2010, 21, 1207.
2 (a) C. Hirayama, H. Ihara and T. Mukai, Macromolecules, 1992,
25, 6375; (b) M. A. J. Chowdhury, R. I. Boyson, H. Ihara and M. T.
W. Hearn, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 11936; (c) H. Ihara,
Y. Goto, T. Sakurai, M. Takafuji, T. Sagawa and S. Nagaoka,
Chem. Lett., 2001, 1252; (d) H. Ihara, T. Sagawa, Y. Goto and
S. Nagaoka, Polymer, 1999, 40, 2555; (e) S. Sakaki, K. Kato,
T. Miyazaki, K. Ohkubo, H. Ihara and C. Hirayama, J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans., 1993, 89, 659.
3 (a) L. C. Sander, S. A. Wise, SRM 869b. Column Selectivity Test
Mixture for Liquid Chromatography (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydro-
carbons). Certificate of Analysis. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 2008;
(b) S. Strohschein, M. Pursch, D. Lubda and K. Albert, Anal.
Chem., 1998, 70, 13; (c) C. W. Henry, C. A. Fortier and
I. M. Warner, Anal. Chem., 2001, 73, 6077; (d) L. C. Sander,
K. E. Sharpless, N. E. Craft and S. A. Wise, Anal. Chem., 1994,
66, 1667; (e) A. K. Mallik, H. Qiu, M. Takafuji and H. Ihara, Anal.
Methods, 2011, 3, 1277.
4 (a) A. R. Hirst, B. Escuder, J. F. Miravet and D. K. Smith, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8002; (b) F. Zhao, M. L. Ma and B. Xu,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 883; (c) G. O. Lloyd and J. W. Steed,
Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 437; (d) P. Dastidar, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008,
37, 2699; (e) M. Suzuki and K. Hanabusa, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009,
38, 967; (f) M. O. M. Piepenbrock, G. O. Lloyd, N. Clarke and
J. W. Steed, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 1960.
5 (a) J. Hwa, J. M. Park and S. Shinkai, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010,
39, 4286; (b) H. Weissman, E. Shirman, E. Shimoni and
B. Rybtchinski, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2011, 6, 141; (c) W. N.
F. Liang, J. Liu, X. Qu, C. Zhang, J. Li, Q. Wang and Z. Yang,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 4727.
molecular shape. Isomers of b-carotene were obtained by
photo-irradiation based on a method in the literature.7 The
chromatograms of all-E b-carotene with C18-mono, C18-poly,
C30, and Sil-FIP after photo-irradiation show the separation
ability of Sil-FIP (see Fig. S13 and S14, ESIw). Enlarged
chromatograms of Sil-FIP clearly show that before irradiation
one peak of all-E was recorded; however, after irradiation
several isomers were separated completely within 25 min. The
peak of all-E was identified by comparing the retention time of
injected samples before and after isomerization. Other peak
assignments are based on the work of Wegmann et al.8
In order to understand the difference between Sil-FIP and
simply-hydrophobized silica, we propose the direct interaction
with the integrated carbonyl groups from the molecular gel.
We have reported that carbonyl groups in Sil-ODAn are
polarized to d+ (carbon) and dÀ (oxygen) and a carbonyl–p
interaction has been discussed.2d This interaction in a model
complex of HCHO–benzene is much stronger (1.87 kcal molÀ1
)
than a CH4–benzene interaction (0.53 kcal molÀ1) and a plane-
to-plane interaction between two benzenes (0.49 kcal molÀ1).2e
Enhancement of selectivity through a carbonyl–p interaction
has been also discussed with Sil-ODAn by the retention time
of PAHs, whose resultant selectivity was higher, especially
at lower temperatures or a crystalline state of ODAn than for
C18 columns.2c This is attributed to the fact that the aligned
carbonyl groups in Sil-ODAn are effective for enhancing
higher selectivity toward PAHs through multiple carbonyl–p
interactions. On the other hand, we have clarified the fact
that five amide bonds are integrated per molecule of 1 and
the functional groups in Sil-FIP form a two-dimensionally
condensed layer by forming hydrogen bonding among the
glutamide moieties, which makes the carbonyl groups into an
ordered form favorable for multiple carbonyl–p interactions
with the guest molecules. 13C CP/MAS NMR spectral results
showed that alkyl chains are slightly ordered at lower
temperature in Sil-FIP, which synergistically increase the
degree of ordering of carbonyl groups. Since Sil-FIP contains
long alkyl chains and NH groups, other interactions like
6 (a) H. Jintoku, Y. Okazaki, S. Ono, M. Takafuji and H. Ihara,
Chem. Lett., 2011, 561; (b) H. Ihara, M. Takafuji, C. Hirayama and
D. F. O’Brien, Langmuir, 1992, 8, 1548; (c) H. Ihara, M. Takafuji
and T. Sakurai, Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,
American Science Publishers, Stevenson Ranch, CA, 2004, vol. 9,
p. 473; (d) H. Ihara, H. Hachisako, C. Hirayama and K. Yamada,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1992, 17, 1244; (e) M. Takafuji,
H. Ihara, C. Hirayama, H. Hachisako and K. Yamada, Liq. Cryst.,
1995, 18, 97.
7 L. Zechmeister and A. Polger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1943, 65, 1522.
8 J. Wegmann, K. Albert, M. Purch and L. C. Saner, Anal. Chem.,
2001, 73, 1814.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 10341–10343 10343