Vanadium-Catalyzed Epoxidations of Alcohols
Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 24, 1999 4923
in contact with a CO2 vapor above it. Two-phase reaction
conditions are sometimes desirable due to the low pressures
associated with these liquid-CO2 reactions, but the presence
of the liquid- and vapor-CO2 phases can introduce complica-
tions in homogeneous catalysis reactions due to uncertainty
in reaction volumes. In summary, liquid-CO2 pressures of 103
bar were chosen as the lowest possible pressure that was still
safely in the single-CO2-phase region.
H2SO4 was used.40 This solution was heated to 75 °C for 20
min, at which time the precipitate was filtered. To the filtrate
was added 1 g of 2,2-dimethyl-6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptafluoro-3,5-
octanedione (Aldrich) dropwise. The mixture was then neu-
tralized with 5% Na2CO3 to precipitate the complexes, which
were recrystallized from benzene and dried in vacuo over P2O5.
Acetyla tion of Allylic a n d Hom oa llylic Alcoh ols a n d
E p oxy Alcoh ols. The epoxides were difficult to isolate
directly; therefore, their acetate derivatives were prepared for
isolation in the following manner. The reactor contents were
depressurized and collected in 20 mL of acetone, and this
solution was then used to rinse the reactor as described earlier.
The acetone solution was then concentrated by rotovaporation
at room temperature to roughly 5 mL. The acetylation was
carried out by adding 1.5 mmol of triethylamine, 1.5 mmol of
acetic anhydride, and 0.08 mmol of 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine
for every 1 mmol of analyte to be derivatized. The deep yellow
solution was stirred in a 100 mL round-bottom flask, during
which time the acetylation solution turned a deep gray-green
color and evolved a significant amount of heat. The reaction
was complete within 6 h. The entire solution was diluted with
10 mL of diethyl ether and washed in a 250 mL separatory
funnel with 1 M HCl (1 × 20 mL). The acetlyation products
were then extracted with an additional volume of 20 mL of
diethyl ether. The organic layer was subsequently washed in
succession with saturated aqueous solutions of the following:
NaHSO3 (1 × 15 mL), NaHCO3 (1 × 20 mL), and NaCl (2 ×
20 mL). The acetylated product was dried over MgSO4 and
filtered using filter paper and a glass wide-mouth funnel. The
organic filtrate was concentrated in vacuo using a rotavap,
yielding an oil which was transferred to a sealed Schlenk
storage flask. Thin-layer chromatography with 1:1 hexane-
ethyl acetate gave good separation of the products with an
acceptable Rf value. The acetylated product was separated by
flash chromatography. A 62 cm glass column, 2.5 cm width
(Aldrich), was filled with silica gel (Merck, grade 9385, 230-
400, mesh 60 Å). Roughly 5 mL of the acetylated oil was added
to a sea sand plug at the top of the column, and the hexane-
ethyl acetate mobile phase was forced through with a flow rate
of approximately 5 mL/min. Ten milliliter fractions were
collected and stored. Each fraction was analyzed by GC-MS,
and those containing pure acetylated product were combined
and concentrated in vacuo by rotavaporation. The pure product
(as an oil) was weighed and a portion solubilized in acetone
for GC-MS analysis; another portion was solubilized in benzene-
Batch reaction contents were collected by venting the CO2
pressure into a glass vial filled with an organic solvent (20
mL of acetone, hexane, or ethyl acetate). Routine analyses were
accomplished by gas chromatography (GC) using a Hewlett-
Packard 5890 Series II instrument with FID detector and 30
m capillary (1.5 µm i.d.) DB 624 column (Alltech). Calibration
curves with commercially available standards were used when
available to quantify conversions and selectivities. Reaction
products were identified using a Hewlett-Packard 5971 A
instrument with mass-selective detector (GC MS) and 30 m
capillary DB 624 column (1.5 µm i.d.) as well as 1H and 13C
NMR for isolated products with and without derivatization.
Kin etics. Kinetic experiments in CO2 were carried out in
identical 33 mL stainless steel reactors which had been
modified for sampling. A Hastelloy high-pressure (344 bar) six-
port two-way switching valve (Valco Inc.) was used to take
samples from the reactor at high pressure. A 100 µL sample
loop was used in all experiments to provide a uniform sample
size. The contents of the loop were vented into a dry 1.8 mL
glass GC vial, the loop was rinsed with solvent via syringe,
and the rinsing solution was collected in the same GC sample
vial. The vial was then sealed and analyzed directly by GC.
The use of an internal standard enabled quantitative analysis
of the olefin and epoxide with good reproducibility and
accuracy. Reactions in organic solvents were carried out in 100
mL glass three-necked round-bottom flasks fitted with a
condenser. Molecular sieves (4 Å, 8-12 mesh, ca. 100) were
added, and VO(OiPr)3 catalyst was added via syringe to the
flask. The round-bottom flask was connected to nitrogen via
a Schlenk line. Samples were taken via a syringe needle and
were quenched with acetone and analyzed by GC. The epoxides
were difficult to isolate directly; therefore, their acetate
derivatives were prepared for isolation by the method de-
scribed by Itoh and co-workers.39 Second-order rate constants
were calculated by dividing the apparent first-order rate
constant by 60 (seconds per minute) and by the concentrations
of catalyst (3.9 × 10-3 M), t-BuOOH (136 mM), and olefin (48
mM) to give k′.
1
d6 for H NMR analysis. The analysis of the acetylated product
confirmed the presence of high-purity material.
P r ep a r a t ion of t h e F lu or in a t ed Va n a d iu m -Acet yl-
a ceton a te Com p lexes. Literature methods were used for the
synthesis of the vanadium complexes of the fluorinated acetyl-
acetonate ligands.35 Vanadyl trifluoroacetylacetonate (VO-
(tfac)) was prepared by dissolving 1.0 g of VOSO4‚4H2O (Strem)
in 5 mL of deionized water, adjusted to pH 3 with the addition
of aqueous Na2CO3, followed by the addition of 1.6 mL of 1,1,1-
trifluorohexane-2,4-dione. During the addition of the ligand
the pH was kept at 3.0 with the addition of a 5% aqueous
Na2CO3 solution. The mixture of green and white precipitates
was filtered and washed with deionized water to remove white
precipitate, and the crude green product was recrystallized
from benzene and dried under vacuum. The product was stored
cold, under N2. Vanadyl dimethylacetylacetonate was also
prepared by this aqueous method, in which 1 g of VOSO4.4H2O
and 250 µL of 5,5-dimethylhexane-2,4-dione were combined
at pH 3.0. The complex was recrystalized from benzene and
dried as above. Vanadyl heptafluorodimethylacetylacetonate
could not be obtained in high yield with the previous method;
therefore, a procedure in which 1 g of V2O5 was added to 4
mL of ethanol and 5 mL of water with 0.5 mL of concentrated
P olym er -Su p p or ted Ca ta lysis. Nafion-Na+ (purchased as
Nafion-H+ as Nafion NR 50 beads, Aldrich) was washed in a
solution of pH 5 aqueous NaOH (200 mL, 0.05 mol NaOH) and
stirred until the pH dropped to a constant level. The beads
were washed in deionized water, and the NaCl washing
process was repeated. The beads were then washed a third
time with a stronger NaCl solution (200 mL, 0.7 mol NaOH)
and washed once the pH leveled off. Nafion-K+ was prepared
using an identical method involving KOH. Vanadium was
exchanged onto the polymer in several different solvents,
including water, methanol, and 2-propanol. These methods
were evaluated, and the most effective was determined to use
vanadyl sulfate (VOSO4‚3H2O, Fisher) because of its simplicity
(other methods required inert atmospheres) and stable van-
adyl-polymer product. Quantification of the vanadium on the
polymer support was achieved by analyzing the preparation
solution after the exchange and subtracting the difference from
the quantity added at the beginning of the reaction. This
method of subtraction required an accurate quantification of
the hydrated vanadium salt added to the exchange solution.
The hydration number of the VOSO4 was measured by
dissolving 0.1 g of VOSO4 (Fisher Lot No. 964622) in 30 mL of
(39) Itoh, T.; J itsukawa, K.; Kaneda, K.; Teranishi, S. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1979, 101, 159.
(40) Rowe, R.; J ones, M. M. Inorg. Synth. 1957, 5, 114.