telluride (2).5 Thus, when 1a and 2 (2.2 equiv) were mixed
in THF at room temperature, the red color corresponding to
the diphenyl ditelluride appeared immediately, and the bis-
silylated 1,4-dihydroquinone (3a, R ) H) and diphenyl
ditelluride (4) were isolated in quantitative yields (Table 1,
To further clarify the synthetic utility of the current
reaction, we next examined the compatibility of functional
groups. The reaction of duroquinone (1.0 equiv) and 2 (2.0
equiv) was conducted in the presence of 2 equiv of the
compounds listed in Figure 2. We found that the reaction
Table 1. Reductive Bis-Silylation of Quinones with
Silyltelluridesa
Ered
(V vs SCE)b
yield
(%)
entry
1
quinone
2,3-dichloro-4,5-dicyano-
1,4-benzoquinone
2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-
1,4-benzoquinone
0.49
0.00
66c
Figure 2. Functional groups that are compatible with the reductive
bis-silylation.
2
96
3
4
5
6
2,6-dichloro-1,4-benzoquinone
1,2-naphthoquinone
1,4-benzoquinone
2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-
1,4-benzoquinone
1,4-naphthoquinone
duroquinone
anthraquinone
-0.20
-0.39
-0.54
-0.67
95
82
100
100
occurred selectively with the quinone and that the additives
were recovered quantitatively in all cases (>90%), while the
reaction of 2 with duroquinone took place in high yield
(>90% yield). The results indicate that the reaction is
compatible with various functional groups, e.g., alkyl and
aryl halides, aldehydes, R,â-unsaturated carbonyl compounds,
and nitro groups. The selective reduction of quinones in the
presence of an alkyl iodide is worth noting, because the
reactivity of the free triethylsilyl radical toward duroquinone
and primary alkyl iodides is known to be almost identical (k
) 109 M-1 s-1).7
7
8
9
-0.72
-0.86
-0.96
98
91
97
a Typical procedures: a THF solution of quinone (ca. 0.5 M) and 2 (2.2
equiv) was stirred for 0.5-1 h at room temperature. b Reduction potential
was measured in a 0.1 M Bu4NClO4 solution of CH3CN by cyclic
voltammetry using glassy carbon as working electrodes. c Isolated as the
corresponding dihydroquinone because the silylated product was hydro-
lytically unstable.
Since we have already reported that the reaction of 2 with
carbonyl compounds generates the R-siloxy carbon radicals,
we propose the mechanism as depicted in Scheme 1. An
entry 5).6 When 1 equiv of 2 was used, half of the quinone
was converted to 3a, indicating that the second silylation
reaction was faster than the first. While the reaction
proceeded in various solvents, the rate of the reaction was
faster in polar solvents than in nonpolar ones. For example,
the reaction in CD3CN was completed in about 0.5 h, while
that in C6D6 required 2 h for completion.
Scheme 1. Possible Reaction Mechanism
The scope of the current reaction was examined, and the
results are summarized in Table 1. Several kinds of quinones
with various substitution patterns were found to react with
2 to afford 3 in good to excellent yields. In all cases, mono-,
di-, tri-, and tetrasubstituted quinones gave the desired
adducts. It is worth noting that not only 1,4-quinones but
also 1,2-quinones were reduced to give the corresponding
bis-silylated 1,2-hydroquinones (entry 4). The reaction rate
was found to be sensitive to the electronic character of the
substituents, and the quinones of higher reduction potential
tend to react faster than those bearing electron-releasing
substituents. Indeed, thin-layer chromatography analysis
indicated that the reaction proceeded in about 10 min with
quinones whose reduction potential is higher than -0.4 V
vs SCE (entries 1-4). The reactivity of the quinones whose
reduction potential is lower than -0.4 V was slightly less,
but in all cases the reaction was completed within 0.5 h
(entries 5-9).
initial electron transfer (ET) from 2 to the quinone generates
a radical ion pair, and the subsequent O-Si bond formation
in the ion pair generates the phenoxy radical 5.8 The radical
5 further reacts with 2 to give 3 and 4.9 An alternative
possibility, which includes the generation of trimethylsilyl
radical from 2 and the subsequent reaction of the radical
(7) (a) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Ingold, K. U.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1982, 104, 5119. (b) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Ingold, K. U.; Scaiano, J. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 5123.
(8) When s a 1:1 mixture of 2 and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-1,4-benzoquinone
was dissolved in EtCN at 20-30 °C, a characteristic ESR signal corre-
sponding to the phenoxy radical species was observed at g ) 2.0044 with
aH ) 0.092 mT. For such radical species, see: (a) Chen, K. S.; Foster, T.;
Wan, J. K. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1979, 1288. (b) Alberti, A.;
Chatgilialoglu, C. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 3963.
(5) (a) Drake, J. E.; Hemmings, R. T. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 1879. (b)
Sasaki, K.; Aso, Y.; Otsubo, T.; Ogura, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 453.
(6) Typical Reaction Procedure. A mixture of 1a (54.2 mg, 0.50 mmol)
and 2 (302.4 mg, 1.09 mmol) in THF (1.0 mL) was stirred at room
temperature for 0.5 h. Removal of the solvent followed by purification on
silica gel afforded 3a as a white solid (127.2 mg, 0.50 mmol, 100%).
(9) See ref 2 for the analogous reaction of TEMPO free radical with 2.
3672
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 23, 2000