4306 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1997, Vol. 40, No. 26
Pierson et al.
the residue was dissolved in EtOAc; washed with 10% citric
acid, 1 N NaHCO3, and saturated NaCl; dried (MgSO4); and
evaporated to an oil (0.71 g). Further purification can be
performed using silica gel chromatography with EtOAc: TLC
(CMA 9:1:1) Rf 0.64; HPLC (IIId) tR 33.4 min.
H-Nle-MeAsp (OBn )-P h e-NH2‚HCl (13). Compound 12
(0.71 g, 1.28 mmol) was subjected to deprotection using method
B: yield 0.502 g (79% from 11); TLC (CMA 9:1:1) Rf 0.13; MS
(TS) m/z 497 (M + H)+; HPLC (IIId) tR 20.9 min.
Boc-Tr p -Nle-MeAsp (OBn )-P h e-NH2 (14). Using method
C, Boc-Trp-OH (0.960 g, 3.17 mmol) was coupled to 13 (1.21
g, 2.44 mmol). Following solvent removal, EtOAc (75 mL) and
hexane (100 mL) were added to the residue, precipitating a
white solid which was collected by filtration, 1.72 g (90% yield).
Further purification can be performed using silica gel chro-
matography with EtOAc or CHCl3: TLC (CMA 9:1:1) Rf 0.67;
mp 150-153 °C; HPLC (IIIe) tR 17.2 min. Anal. (C43H54N6O8‚
0.4EtOAc) C, H, N.
H-Tr p -Nle-MeAsp (OBn )-P h e-NH 2‚HCl (15). Compound
14 (2.93 g, 3.75 mmol) with anisole (1.63 mL, 15 mmol) was
deprotected using method B and lyophilized from glacial acetic
acid: yield 2.37 g (88%); TLC (CMA 9:1:1) Rf 0.2; MS (TS) m/z
783 (M + H)+; HPLC (IIIe) tR 8.6 min. Anal. (C38H46N6O6‚
0.12HCl‚0.02HOAc‚0.8H2O) C, H, N.
Pyr‚SO3 (60 mg, 0.38 mmol).24 After 1 h the reaction was
found to be incomplete by HPLC, and more Pyr‚SO3 (60 mg,
0.38 mmol) was added followed in 1 h with additional Pyr‚SO3
(360 mg, 2.26 mmol). After 2.5 h the reaction mixture was
diluted with 5% NH4OH (100 mL), stirred for 0.5 h, and
evaporated in vacuo. The residue was purified by preparative
reverse-phase chromatography, Prep-LC (B), 0.347 g (74%):
HPLC (Ia) tR 41.8 min; HPLC (Ia) tR 7.11 min; MS (TS)
m/z 975 (M - H)-; [R]23 -68.4° (c 0.1, MeOH). Anal.
D
(C47H63N9O13S‚NH3‚1.8H2O) C, H, N.
Ack n ow led gm en t. We would like to thank Tim
Ordway for the amino acid analysis, Bill Kuipers for the
NMR, and David Coombers for the MS. We would also
like to thank Dr. William Michne for his helpful dis-
cussions and critical reading of the manuscript.
Refer en ces
(1) Mutt, V. Cholecystokinin: Isolation, Structure and Functions.
In Gastrointestinal Hormones; Glass, G. B. J ., Ed.; Raven
Press: New York, 1980; pp 169-221.
(2) Vanderhaeghen, J . J .; Crawley, J . N. Neuronal Cholecystokinin.
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1985, 448.
(3) Crawley, J . N.; Corwin, R. L. Biological Actions of Cholecysto-
kinin. Peptides 1994, 15, 731-755.
(4) Dourish, C., T.; Hill, D. R. Classification and Function of CCK
Receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1987, 8, 207-208.
(5) Smith, G. P.; Gibbs, J . Satiating Effect of Cholecystokinin. Ann.
N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1994, 713, 236-241.
(6) Raybould, H. E.; Lloyd, K. C. Integration of Postprandial
Function in the Proximal Gastrointestinal Tract. Role of CCK
and Sensory Pathways. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1994, 713, 143-
156.
(7) Gibbs, J .; Young, R. C.; Smith, G. P. Cholecystokinin Decreased
Food Intake in Rats. J . Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1973, 84, 488-
495.
(8) Baile, C. A.; McLaughlin, C. L.; Della-Fera, M. A. Role of
Cholecystokinin and Opioid Peptides in Control of Food Intake.
Physiol. Rev. 1986, 66, 172-230.
(9) Kissileff, H. R.; Pi-Sunyer, X.; Thornton, J .; Smith, G. P.
C-terminal Octapeptide of Cholecystokinin Decrease Food Intake
In Man. Am. J . Clin. Nutr. 1981, 34, 154-160.
(10) Simmons, R. D.; Blossser, J . C.; Rosamond, J . D. FPL 14294: A
Novel CCK-8 Agonist with Potent Intranasal Anorectic Activity
in the Rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1994, 47, 701-708.
(11) Schneider, L. H.; Murphy, R. B.; Gibbs, J .; Smith, G. P.
Comparative Potencies of CCK Antagonist for the Reversal of
the Satiating Effect of Cholecystokinin. In Cholecystokinin
Antagonist; Wang, R. Y., Schoenfeld, R., Eds.; A. R. Liss: New
York, 1988; pp 263-284.
(12) Nadzan, A. M.; Kerwin, J . F., J r. Cholecystokinin Agonists and
Antagonists. In Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry; Bristol,
J . A., Ed.; Academic: San Diego, CA, 1991; pp 191-200.
(13) Shiosaki, K; Lin, C. W.; Kopecka, H.; Tufano, M. D.; Bianchi, B.
R.; Miller, T. R.; Witte, D. G.; Nadzan, A. M. Boc-CCK-4
Derivatives Containing Side-Chain Ureas as Potent and Selec-
tive CCK-A Receptor Agonist. J . Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 2837-
2842.
(14) Holladay, M. W.; Bennett, M.; Tufano, M.; Lin, C.; Asin, K.;
Witte, D.; Miller, T.; Bianchi, B.; Bednarz, L.; Nadzan, A.
Synthesis and Biological Activities of CCK Heptapeptide Ana-
logues. Effects on Conformational Constraints and Standard
Modifications on Receptor Subtype Selectivity and Functional
Activity in Vitro and Appetite Suppression In Vivo. J . Med.
Chem. 1992, 35, 2919-2928.
(15) Tilley, J . W.; Danho, W.; Madison, V.; Fry, D.; Swistok, J .;
Makofske, R.; Michalewsky, J .; Schwartz, A.; Weatherford, S.;
Triscari, J .; Nelson, D. Analogs of CCK Incorporating Confor-
mationally Constrained Replacements for Asp32. J . Med. Chem.
1992, 35, 4249-4252.
(16) Rosamond, J . D.; Comstock, J .; Blosser, J . C.; Augello-Vaisey,
S. J . Structural Requirements for Satiety Effect of CCK-8. In
Peptides: Structure and Function; Deber, C. M., Hruby, V. J .,
Kopple, K. D., Eds.; Pierce: Rockford, IL, 1985; pp 241-244.
(17) Simmons, R. D.; Pierson, M. E.; Kaiser, F.; Rosamond, J . D. ARL
15849: A Selective CCK-A Agonist with Anorectic Activity in
the Rat and Dog. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., in press.
(18) Albericio, F.; Kneib-Cordonier, N.; Lajos, G.; Hammer, R.;
Hudson, D.; Barney, G. Solid-Phase Synthesis of C-terminal
Peptide Amides Under Mild Conditions. In Peptides Chemistry
and Biology, Proceedings of the Tenth American Peptide Sym-
posium; Marshall, G. R., Ed.; Escom: Leiden, 1988; pp 159-
161.
Boc-Nle-Gly-OMe (16). Using coupling method A, Boc-
Nle-OH (1.61 g, 11.16 mmol) was coupled with H-Gly-OMe‚
HCl (0.900 g, 10.1 mmol): yield 1.425 g (47%); TLC (CMA 9:1:
1) Rf 0.88; mp 97-99 °C; MS (CI) m/z 303 (M + H)+. Anal.
(C14H26N2O5) C, H, N.
H-Nle-Gly-OMe‚HCl (17). Compound 16 (3.77 g, 12.5
mmol) was deprotected using method B: yield 2.88 g (97%);
TLC (CMA, 9:1:1) Rf 0.16; mp 147-148 °C. Anal. (C9H18N2O3‚
HCl) C, H, N.
Hp a -Nle-Gly-OMe (18). To a stirred solution of Hpa-OSu
(3.32 g, 13.3 mmol; prepared by the method of Hankovszky27
)
and DIEA (2.32 mL, 13.3 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) was added a
solution of 17 (2.88 g, 12.1 mmol) and DIEA (2.11 mL, 12.1
mmol) in DMF (40 mL). After 18 h the solvent was removed
in vacuo; the residue was dissolved in EtOAc; washed with
10% citric acid, 1 N NaHCO3, and saturated NaCl; dried
(MgSO4); and evaporated to a small volume. Addition of
hexanes precipitated the product as a white solid, 3.02 g
(77%): TLC (CMA, 9:1:1) Rf 0.53; mp 146-147.5 °C; MS (CI)
m/z 337 (M + H)+. Anal. (C17H24N2O5) C, H, N.
Hp a -Nle-Gly-OH (19). To a stirred, -10 °C solution of
Hpa-Nle-Gly-OMe (3.00 g, 8.92 mmol) in MeOH (30 mL) was
added slowly 1 N NaOH (17.8 mL, 17.8 mmol). After the
solution was warmed to warm to room temperature over 1 h,
water (50 mL) was added. The aqueous solution was washed
with ether and acidified (1 N HCl) to pH 3. The product was
extracted into EtOAc, washed with saturated NaCl, dried
(MgSO4), and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue
was recrystallized from EtOAc/hexanes, 1.47 g (51%): TLC
(CMA, 9:1:1) Rf 0.19; mp 136-138 °C; MS (CI) m/z 322 (M +
H)+. Anal. (C16H22N2O3) C, H, N.
Hp a -Nle-Gly-Tr p -Nle-MeAsp (OBn )-P h e-NH2 (20). Us-
ing coupling method C, 19 (0.538 g, 1.67 mmol) was coupled
to 15 (1.00 g, 1.39 mmol). To the product in EtOAc (50 mL)
was added ether, and the precipitate was collected by filtration,
1.04 g (76%): HPLC (IIId) tR 32.8 min.
Hp a -Nle-Gly-Tr p -Nle-MeAsp -P h e-NH2 (21). To a solu-
tion of 20 (1.07 g, 1.08 mmol) in MeOH (150 mL) was added
10% Pd/C (300 mg), and the suspension was shaken under a
hydrogen atmosphere for 6 h. The catalyst was removed by
filtration and the solvent evaporated to an oil. The product
was purified by preparative reverse-phase chromatography,
Prep-LC (A), tR 39 min (loading dependent). Product-contain-
ing fractions were evaporated to dryness, and the residue was
dissolved in EtOAc and precipitated with hexanes, 0.408 g
(42%): HPLC (IIIf) tR 9.8 min; MS (FAB) m/z 897 (M + H)+;
AAA, Gly 1.07, MeAsp 1.06, Nle 1.93, Phe 0.94. Anal.
(C47H60N8O10‚1.8H2O) C, H, N.
Meth od D. Hp a (SO3H)-Nle-Gly-Tr p -Nle-MeAsp -P h e-
NH2‚NH3 (6). Su lfa tion Meth od . To a stirred solution of
21 (242 mg, 0.27 mmol, dried overnight under high vacuum)
in anhydrous pyridine (4 mL) under nitrogen was added
(19) King, D. S.; Fields, C. G.; Fields, G. B. A Cleavage Method Which
Minimizes Side Reactions Following Fmoc Solid-Phase Peptide
Synthesis. Int. J . Pept. Protein Res. 1990, 36, 255-266.