ChemComm
Communication
Scheme 3 Synthesis of the reassigned structure.
Fig. 4 Luciferase assay-U2OS-HRE-Luc cells,6 1% O2 (16 h), compounds
at 5 mM.
To prove conclusively the postulated structure of NSC-134754,
the synthesis of both diastereoisomers of the regioisomer 21 was
carried out. We envisaged that this could be achieved using the
previously developed chemistry starting from Boc-protected tetra-
hydroisoquinoline 4. The required tricyclic bromide 22 was success-
fully synthesized in 12% yield in 6 steps using the same chemistry
employed in the original synthesis. Unfortunately, the zinc-
mediated reaction to introduce the tetrahydroisoquinoline was
not successful using 6,7-dimethoxydihydroisoquinoline 24. We
postulated that this was due to the electron-donating methoxy
groups reducing the electrophilicity of the dihydroisoquinoline.
This problem was overcome by the formation of an iminium salt
from dihydroisoquinoline 2421 and best results were seen using the
benzyl iodide salt 25 (Scheme 3).
The zinc-mediated reaction was improved further by replacing
solid zinc, which was found to be capricious, with a dialkylzinc
reagent. Initially diethylzinc was used but addition of the ethyl
group to 25 was found to compete with the desired reaction. This
unwanted reaction was avoided by using the more sterically hin-
dered diisopropylzinc and the required carbon–carbon bond was
formed in 61% yield. Amide reduction and benzyl deprotection
proceeded smoothly to give both diastereoisomers of the reassigned
structure 21a and 21b in 10 steps. Although an extra deprotection
step was required in this synthesis, the overall yield was maintained
at 2% due to the improved yield of the zinc-mediated reaction.
NMR data for one of the synthetic diastereoisomers was
identical to the NCI sample, proving that the correct structure
of NSC-134754 is structure 21, a regioisomer of the reported
structure. The stereochemistry of NSC-134754 was also assigned
for the first time by X-ray crystallography (Fig. 3, formula
C27H36N2O2ꢂH2OꢂHSO4ꢂ0.5SO4) and shown to be the same as for
(ꢁ)-2,3-dehydroemetine 2.
Both diastereoisomers of each regioisomer synthesized were
tested for their HIF inhibitory activity using our previously described
HRE luciferase reporter assay6 (Fig. 4). Only 21a was shown to
exhibit inhibitory activity, demonstrating the importance of both the
position of the methoxy groups and the stereochemistry for activity.
In summary, we have synthesized a compound with the reported
structure of the HIF inhibitor NSC-134754 using an RCM reaction to
prepare a key tricyclic intermediate and an allylzinc addition to a
dihydroisoquinoline to complete the pentacycle. Both diastereo-
isomers of this compound 3a,b are inactive. This has led to the
reassignment of the structure of NSC-134754 and we further devel-
oped the allylzinc chemistry to prepare this compound 21a,b. One
of the diastereomers, 21a, was shown to possess HIF inhibitory
properties. Furthermore, we have shown that NSC-134754 and NSC-
134756 have the same structure, 21a. Our synthetic route will allow
the synthesis of a variety of novel analogues to further investigate
the mechanism of action of this interesting class of compounds.
Notes and references
1 W. Weigrebe, W. J. Kramer and M. Shamma, J. Nat. Prod., 1984, 47, 397.
2 R. Knight, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 1980, 6, 577.
3 W. R. Jondorf, B. J. Abbott, N. H. Greenber and J. A. R. Mead, Chemother-
apy, 1971, 16, 109.
4 J. D. Donahue, R. K. Johnson and W. R. Jondorf, Br. J. Pharmacol., 1971,
43, P456.
5 R. S. Gupta, J. J. Krepinsky and L. Siminovitch, Mol. Pharmacol., 1980,
18, 136.
6 N. M. Chau, P. Rogers, W. Aherne, V. Carroll, I. Collins, E. McDonald,
P. Workman and M. Ashcroft, Cancer Res., 2005, 65, 4918.
7 V. A. Carroll and M. Ashcroft, Cancer Res., 2006, 66, 6264.
8 E. Poon, A. L. Harris and M. Ashcroft, Expert Rev. Mol. Med., 2009, 11, 26.
9 G. L. Semenza, Oncogene, 2010, 29, 625.
10 M. Kioi, H. Vogel, G. Schultz, R. M. Hoffman, G. R. Harsh and
J. M. Brown, J. Clin. Invest., 2010, 120, 694.
12 M. Shamma, The Isoquinoline Alkaloids, 1972, p. 426.
13 E. Garcia, E. Lete and N. Sotomayor, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 6776.
14 S. M Allin, D. G. Vaidya, S. L. James, J. E. Allard, T. A. D. Smith,
V. McKee and W. P. Martin, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 3661.
15 G. M. Coppola, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1991, 28, 1769.
16 A. Furstner and K. Langemann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 9130.
17 T. J. Donohoe, R. E. Thomas, M. D. Cheeseman, C. L. Rigby,
G. Bhalay and I. D. Linney, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 3615.
18 I. C. Stewart, T. Ung, A. A. Pletnev, J. M. Berlin, R. H. Grubbs and
Y. Schrodi, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 1589.
19 G. R. A. Adair and J. M. J. Williams, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 8233.
20 C. Jahangir, D. B. Maclean, M. A. Brook and H. L. J. Holland,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1986, 1608.
21 T. Shono, H. Hamaguchi, M. Sasaki, S. Fujita and K. J. Nagami,
J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 1621.
Fig. 3 Stereochemistry of NSC-134754 and X-ray crystal structure (rela-
tive stereochemistry of the cation in the asymmetric unit is SRS at N1, C13,
C17 respectively, see ESI† for ORTEP plot).
1240 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 1238--1240
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014