SCHEME 3. Ca r bon yla tion of 2-Ch lor op yr id in e w ith a P h en ol w ith a n d w ith ou t Stir r in g
ridine and 24 µL of Et3N, 600 µL of a stock solution of the alcohol
of carbonylation), analytical (only products containing a
sufficiently basic function can be analyzed by ES+-MS)
or handling problems (loading under air can poison
catalyst), or due to our workup procedure (standard LC
method and isolation procedure might not be suitable for
all products). However, as the system has not been
optimized, it is expected that more products/higher yields
could be obtained if necessary.
To compare the results obtained with 2-chloropyridine
without stirring to those in a stirred autoclave, we
investigated the reaction depicted in Scheme 3 in more
detail. We isolated this sterically demanding ester in 17%
yield with stirring compared to 11%. Thus on small-scale
comparable results can be obtained without stirring even
with relatively unreactive alcohols.
To carry the parallelization one step further, we
performed the same experiments in a standard 96-deep
well plate. Because of its relatively large size, we could
not use the 300-mL autoclave but had to resort to a 16 L
vessel instead. This led to a much longer time span
between the loading of the reaction mixture, the closing
of the autoclave, and the start of the reaction, resulting
most likely in some catalyst decomposition (no inert
conditions). Furthermore, heat transfer was much more
difficult to ensure, handling was more cumbersome, and
last but not least it was not very economical to fill an
almost empty 16-L vessel with the relatively expensive
CO, and using only a very small fraction of it. Neverthe-
less, in many cases we found the desired esters, and even
a few products with alcohols which gave no ester in the
setup described above. Most likely, an optimized ap-
paratus would also allow reliable carbonylation in 96-
deep well plates.
(4 equiv with regard to 2-chloroypridine) in DMF was added.
The vial was closed with a rubber stopper, which was glued to
the vial. To allow gas diffusion, the rubber stopper was perfo-
rated with a small hollow shaft needle. To homogenize the
mixture, the vial was shaken manually and then transferred
into a 300-mL stainless steel autoclave filled with approximately
200 mL of quartz sand. After adding the other 11 vials loaded
with the same procedure, the autoclave was closed and checked
for leaks with He (50 bar). After releasing the helium, the
autoclave was pressurized with CO to 25 bar and heated to 130
°C with a heating rate of 80 °C/h. After 14 h, the autoclave was
cooled to room temperature, depressurized, purged with nitro-
gen, and opened to the atmosphere.
Wor k u p . The reaction mixtures were filtered over cotton to
remove solid Pd-residues. In some cases it was necessary to add
small amounts of DMF to dissolve crystallized Et3N‚HCl. The
clear solutions were analyzed by LC-MS after dissolving 10 µL
of the reaction mixture in 600 µL of CH3CN. Then, the samples
were separated by preparative HPLC-MS. After the separation,
100-µL fractions were drawn from each of the vials containing
the separated products and again analyzed on the analytical LC-
MS machine. The vials containing the products of interest were
evaporated to dryness by blowing warm nitrogen over or in a
vacuum centrifuge. The evaporated vials were weighted to
determine the product yield and the pooled products were
analyzed by NMR.
Sca le-Up Exp er im en t. Syn th esis of 3: Allylphenol (1.0 g),
100 µL of 2-chloropyridine, and 260 µL of Et3N were dissolved
in 25 mL of DMF and placed in a 100-mL autoclave fitted with
a magnet-driven hollow shaft stirrer. After the addition of 23.0
mg of PdCl2(PhCN)2 and 47 mg of dppp, the autoclave was closed
and checked for leaks with He (50 bar). As described for the
parallel experiments, CO (25 bar) was introduced after releasing
the helium and the autoclave was heated to 130 °C with a
heating rate of 80 °C/h. After 14 h, the autoclave was cooled to
room temperature, carefully depressurized, purged with nitro-
gen, opened, and unloaded. The reaction mixture was filtered
through a cartridge filled with silica gel and the filtrate was
purified by flash chromatography (column 3.5 × 35 cm2, EtOAc/
cyclohexane 1:1 as eluent). After removing the solvent, 70 mg
(17%) of the desired ester was isolated as a pale yellow-green
oil. Rf 0.21; 1H NMR (499.9 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) δ 8.85-8.87
(m, 1 H), 8.29 (d, J ) 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.91 (dpt, J ) 7.7 Hz, 1.8 Hz,
1 H), 7.54-7.56 (m, 1 H), 7.19 (pt, J ) 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 6.87-6.90
(m, 2 H), 5.86-5.95 (m, 1 H), 5.00-5.05 (m, 2 H), 3.80 (s, 3H),
3.38 (d, J ) 6.6 Hz, 2 H); 13C{1H} NMR (125.0 MHz, CDCl3, 298
K) δ 162.9, 151.3, 150.2, 147.5, 138.4, 137.1, 135.9, 133.5, 127.2,
126.6, 125.8, 121.8, 116.4, 110.4, 56.0, 34.6; MS (ESP+) 270.1
(M + H), 311.1 (M + CH3CN), 333.1 (M + CH3CN + Na).
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that a simple
reaction setup allows the rapid screening of aryl halide
carbonylation in the presence of alcohols in DMF allowing
the preparation of the corresponding esters on a mil-
ligram scale. No stirring and no inert conditions are
necessary with 4-bromoacetophenone and 2-chloropyri-
dine as substrates. Forty nine different esters (43 new
compounds) were synthesized, isolated, and characterized
1
by MS and H NMR. While in some cases it was not clear
why no product was obtained, we were able to rapidly
synthesize a wide variety of valuable products and to
identify trends and reactivity patterns.
Ack n ow led gm en t. We thank Heinz Steiner for
discussion and technical help.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: 1H NMR and MS
data for all new compounds. This material is available free of
Typ ica l Exp er im en t for 12 P a r a llel Rea ction s w ith ou t
Stir r in g in a 300-m L Au tocla ve. PdCl2(PhCN)2 (2.0 mg) and
4.0 mg of 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp) were placed
in a 1-mL glass vial. After the addition of 12 µL of 2-chloropy-
J O034112V
3728 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 9, 2003