A remarkable activity of human leukotriene A4 hydrolase
hydrophobic phenyl ring derivatized with different sub-
stituents. In another study, (Enomoto et al. 2009) obtained
S-(4-cyclohexyl)benzyl-cysteine derivatives as potent and
selective LTA4H inhibitors, which contained a sulfhydryl
group of cysteine protected with very bulky and hydro-
phobic phenyl and additional cyclohexyl rings. Moreover,
a recent comprehensive review on LTA4H inhibitors
demonstrates several structures with features in common
with the above discussed structural elements preferred in
the S1 pocket of LTA4H (Caliskan and Banoglu 2013).
Finally, analysis of the crystal structure of LTA4H dem-
onstrates that besides the electronegative properties at the
bottom of the S1 pocket, its upper parts are more neutral
and facilitate binding of hydrophobic groups (Tholander
et al. 2008).
In summary, we have performed a detailed analysis of
the S1 pocket specificity of LTA4H aminopeptidase. Using
substrate library screening we demonstrated key features of
this enzyme, disclosing particular preferences in shape and
size of potential substrates and inhibitors, which can
facilitate rational design of small molecular-mass selective
markers that can be used in studies of LTA4H.
Acknowledgments We thank Marcin Poreba, Zofia Pilch, Paulina
Piatek, and Anders Wetterholm for help with synthesis of fluorogenic
substrates and preparation of purified LTA4H. The Drag laboratory is
supported by the State for Scientific Research Grant N N401 042,838
¨
and the Foundation for Polish Science in Poland. The Haeggstrom
laboratory is supported by the Swedish Research Council (10,350,
2011-5003). The Salvesen laboratory is supported by NIH Grants
CA163743 and GM09040.
In addition to providing information about substrate
specificity, a very intriguing observation in our study was
the dramatic increase of the catalytic efficiency of sub-
strates based on unnatural amino acids compared to those
containing natural ones. Usually, in our previous studies,
the maximal increase in efficiency was about 2–3-fold
(Drag et al. 2010; Poreba et al. 2012b; Zervoudi et al.
2011). To the best of our knowledge, a gain in catalytic
efficiency exceeding two orders of magnitude has never
been observed with synthetic substrates for any type of
exopeptidase. One could perhaps expect this result with tri-
or tetrapeptidic substrates for endoproteases, but with
conjugates of single amino acids for exopeptidases this
result is highly unusual. It provides evidence for the
potential of unnatural amino acids to be applied in substrate
activity screenings of proteolytic enzymes, but also raises
the question of the molecular basis for this effect. Recently,
we speculated that substrate specificity of proteases could
be dictated by posttranslational modifications, an issue that
has not been investigated in detail before (Kasperkiewicz
et al. 2012). Our observation of increased catalytic effi-
ciency against side-chain modified versions of L-Asp, L-
Glu, L-Cys and L-Ser seems to fit perfectly with this sce-
nario. However, it is difficult to speculate about the nature
of putative natural amino acid modifications based on data
with only single amino acids and this issue will certainly
require further studies, most probably using proteomic
methods on endogenous substrates.
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict
of interest.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, dis-
tribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author(s) and the source are credited.
References
Caliskan B, Banoglu E (2013) Overview of recent drug discovery
approaches for new generation leukotriene A(4) hydrolase
inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Discov 8(1):49–63. doi:10.1517/
Drag M, Bogyo M, Ellman JA, Salvesen GS (2010) Aminopeptidase
fingerprints, an integrated approach for identification of good
substrates and optimal inhibitors. J Biol Chem 285(5):3310–
Enomoto H, Morikawa Y, Miyake Y, Tsuji F, Mizuchi M, Suhara H,
Fujimura K, Horiuchi M, Ban M (2009) Synthesis and biological
evaluation of N-mercaptoacylcysteine derivatives as leukotriene
A4 hydrolase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19(2):442–446.
Gajda AD, Pawelczak M, Drag M (2012) Substrate specificity
screening of oat (Avena sativa) seeds aminopeptidase demon-
strate unusually broad tolerance in S1 pocket. Plant Physiol
Haeggstrom JZ, Funk CD (2011) Lipoxygenase and leukotriene
pathways: biochemistry, biology, and roles in disease. Chem Rev
Kannan Sivaraman K, Paiardini A, Sienczyk M, Ruggeri C, Oellig
CA, Dalton JP, Scammells PJ, Drag M, McGowan S (2013)
Synthesis and Structure-Activity Relationships of Phosphonic
Arginine Mimetics as Inhibitors of the M1 and M17 Amino-
peptidases from Plasmodium falciparum. J Med Chem 56(12):
Kasperkiewicz P, Gajda AD, Drag M (2012) Current and prospective
applications of non-proteinogenic amino acids in profiling of
proteases substrate specificity. Biol Chem 393(9):843–851.
Kirkland TA, Adler M, Bauman JG, Chen M, Haeggstrom JZ, King
B, Kochanny MJ, Liang AM, Mendoza L, Phillips GB,
Thunnissen M, Trinh L, Whitlow M, Ye B, Ye H, Parkinson J,
Guilford WJ (2008) Synthesis of glutamic acid analogs as potent
Our study also confirms the unusual LTA4H activity
toward substrates containing L-Pro. The secondary amine at
its N terminus is normally not well recognized by enzymes
of the M1 family of metallopeptidases with the GXMEN
motif, which is responsible for interactions with the free
amine in a position (Tholander et al. 2008). However,
processing of L-Pro substrates in our studies is consistent
with the ability of LTA4H to hydrolyze the endogenous
substrate Proline-Glycine-Proline (PGP), a chemoattractant
for leukocytes (Snelgrove et al. 2010).
123