Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
completed, the reaction mixture was heated to reflux, turning from
yellow to orange after a few hours, and left overnight. The mixture was
then left to cool to room temperature, and some drops of EtOH were
added in order to quench any remaining NaH, followed by careful
addition of 100 mL of water. Acetic acid (20 mL) was then added,
which led to a change of color to orange and a change of texture while
a precipitate formed. After adding about 75% of the acetic acid, the
mixture turned suddenly dark brown, and the precipitate dissolved.
The resulting two layers were separated and the organic phase was
extracted with diethyl ether. The combined organic phases were dried
over MgSO4, and the solvent removed in vacuum. The product is a
yellow solid. The yield was 3.91 g (50%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, ppm in
CDCl3): 16.3 (s, 2H), 8.3 (d, 2H), 8.06 (t, 1H), 7.96 (dd, 2H), 7.72
(s, 2H), 7.48 (td, 2H), 7.06 (dd, 2H), 6.95 (dt, 2H), 3.8 (s, 6H). IR
(KBr pellet)/cm−1: 3432 w, 2923 w, 2847 w, 1600 s, 1489 s, 1464 m,
1284 m, 1243 s, 1180 m, 1020 w, 992 m, 814 m, 763 m, 615 m. Mass
(M + H)+ 432.2. EA, calcd (%) for C25H21NO6 (found): C, 69.6
(69.15); H, 4.91 (4.91); N, 3.25 (3.27).
2,6-bis(5-(2-methoxyphenyl)-pyrazol-3-yl)pyridine (H2L).
Solid H2L1 (2 g, 4.64 mmol) was refluxed overnight with hydrazine
monohydrate (0.44 g, 9.27 mmol) in MeOH (120 mL). After cooling
to room temperature, the off-white suspension was filtered and washed
with diethyl ether to afford a white precipitate which was dried in air.
The yield was 1.72g (87%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, ppm in DMSO-d6):
13.5 (broad s, 2H), 7.98 (broad t, 1H), 7.90 (broad m, 2H), 779
(broad m, 2H), 7.36 (m, 4H), 7.14 (dd, 2H), 7.04 (m, 2H), 3.93 (s,
6H). IR (KBr pellet)/cm−1: 3314 s, 3175 s, 2922 s, 1602 m, 1576 s,
1477 s, 1443 m, 1292 s, 1181 s, 1032 m, 1004 m, 958 m, 797 m, 738 s.
Mass (M + H)+ 424.4. EA, calcd (%) for C25H21N5O2 H2O (found):
C, 68.00 (67.60); H, 5.25 (5.23); N, 15.86 (15.42).
Coordination Complexes. [Fe(bpp)(H2L)](ClO4)2·1.5·C3H6O (1).
A suspension of H2L (0.026 g, 0.06 mmol) and bpp (0.013 g, 0.06
mmol) in acetone (10 mL) was added dropwise with stirring to a
solution of Fe(ClO4)2·6H2O (0.034 g, 0.13 mmol) and ascorbic acid
(∼3 mg) in acetone (10 mL). The resulting orange solution was
stirred for 45−60 min at room temperature, before being filtered and
layered with diethyl-ether (volume 1:1). Crystals suitable for X-ray
diffraction formed after 2 days (0.038 g, 65%). IR (KBr pellet)/cm−1:
3404 (m), 3145 (w), 2942 (w), 1615 (w), 1474 (m), 1259 (w), 1121
(s), 1112 (s), 1089 (s), 1015 (m), 775 (m), 625 (m). EA, calcd (%)
for C36H30Cl2FeN10O10·1.5C3H6O (found): C, 49.81 (49.30); H, 4.03
(4.04); N, 14.34 (14.45).
[Fe(bpp)(H2L)](ClO4)2·C3H6O (2). Crystals of compound 1 were
brought to 120 °C in an oven for 2 h, inducing a color change from
dark red to orange. The heating process caused the loss of 0.5 mol of
acetone per formula unit. IR (KBr pellet)/cm−1: 3408 (w), 2948 (w),
1615 (w), 1475 (m), 1255 (w), 1120 (s), 1108 (s), 1092 (s), 1080 (s),
1014 (m), 767 (m), 624 (m). EA, calcd (%) for C36H30Cl2FeN10O10·
0.96C3H6O·0.8H2O (found): C, 48.66 (48.17); H, 3.92 (3.56); N,
14.60 (15.1).
that corresponds to a SCO. On warming again, the χMT vs T
curve superimposes with the cooling branch up to 375 K (and
not with the curve originally seen for 3), which is consistent
with a process of SCO of the system in equilibrium (Figure
S14).
TGA experiments comparing the behavior of 1 and 3 suggest
that indeed both systems experience the expected solvent loss
following the increase in temperature; 0.5 mol of acetone in
one case and to 1 mol of MeOH plus 1 mol of water in the
other (Figures S15 and S16). The difference in desorption
temperatures (Figure 4, bottom) are in agreement with the
effects observed through magnetometry. This difference was
maintained when cycling the system between the three different
structurally characterized phases more than once.
The system depleted of MeOH/H2O by heating, remained
crystalline, however, it could not be characterized by single
crystal X-ray diffraction. Nevertheless, it was exposed to
saturated methanol vapors for 24 h. The magnetic measure-
ment of the resulting system recreated the behavior seen for 3
(Figure 4, top), suggesting that the hydro-methanolated
product was regenerated and that this process of solvent
depletion and reabsorption was also reversible. This was
corroborated through TGA measurements (Figure S17) by
repeating the transformation over two cycles. The fact that both
solvent systems studied (acetone and MeOH/H2O, respec-
tively) exhibit a distinctly different temperature of desorption
provides a fingerprint that enhances the interest of investigating
in the future the response of this lattice to other analytes.
Like the replacement of MeOH and H2O by acetone in the
transformation of 3 into 1 (Figures 2, S18 and S19), the
formation of 1, as obtained from heating 3 and exposing it to
acetone vapors, was also corroborated by EA, TGA and
magnetometry (Figures S20 and S21).
CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK
■
In summary, the lattice of the heteroleptic molecular
coordination complex [Fe(bpp)(H2L)](ClO4)2 has proven to
exhibit remarkable small-molecule exchange abilities accom-
panied by drastic variations on the structure and physicochem-
ical properties. Surprisingly, the observed processes of
desorption/absorption or exchange are fully reversible with
persistence of the crystallinity, despite the fact that the lattice is
nonporous and nonpolymeric. This is the result of a subtle
balance between flexibility of end moieties of H2L in 1,
combined with a robust network of intermolecular interactions.
This opens up perspectives for developing this and related
compounds as potential sensors of small molecules in the gas
phase, by exploiting the robustness of the system and the
possibility of following this process through a variety of
common techniques. We are currently investigating these
promising avenues by exploring the absorption and exchange of
a large variety of other analytes.
[Fe(bpp)(H2L)](ClO4)2·1.25CH4O·0.5H2O (3). Crystals of 2 were
exposed to saturated methanol vapors during 24 h. During the process
the crystals changed colors from orange to dark red. IR (KBr pellet)/
cm−1: 3405 (w), 2928 (w), 1615 (w), 1476 (m), 1260 (w), 1122 (s),
1108 (s), 1100 (s), 1074 (s), 1014 (m), 772 (m), 623 (m). EA, calcd
(%) for C36H30Cl2FeN10O10·1.25CH4O·H2O (found): C, 47.22
(46.66); H, 3.94 (3.67); N, 14.78 (15.26).
X-ray Crystallography Data Collection. Data were collected at
different temperatures for 1−3 and 1′ using a Bruker APEX II CCD
diffractometer on station 11.3.1 of the Advanced Light Source at
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, at λ = 0.7749 Å, from a
silicon 111 monochromator. The structures were solved by direct
methods. The integration of diffraction profiles and absorption
corrections were made with the SAINT30 and SADABS31 programs.
Materials for publication were prepared using SHELXTL,32
PLATON,33 Mercury 1.4,34 and Olex235 programs. Olex2 has been
used for calculating the solvent accessible voids.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
Synthesis of the Organic Ligands. Ligand 2,6-bis(pyrazol-3-
yl)pyridine (bpp) was synthesized as described in the literature.29
2,6-bis(3-oxo-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)-propionyl)pyridine
(H2L1). 2-Methoxyacetophenone (5.44 g, 36.2 mmol) and ethyl-2,6-
pyridinedicarboxylate (4.04 g, 18.1 mmol) were dissolved in
dimethoxyethane (DME, 200 mL) under a nitrogen atmosphere. A
60% oil dispersion of NaH (8.35 g, 208.8 mmol) was washed for 20
min under N2 with hexane. The solvent was extracted using a filter
cannula, and DME (50 mL) was added. This suspension was added
dropwise with stirring to the above mixture. After the addition was
Physical Measurements. Variable-temperature magnetic suscept-
ibility data were obtained with a Quantum Design MPMS-XL SQUID
magnetometer at the “Unitat de Mesures Magnetiques” of the
̀
3873
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja411595y | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 3869−3874