GModel
EA-21554; No. of Pages10
ARTICLE IN PRESS
P. Ledwon et al. / Electrochimica Acta xxx (2013) xxx–xxx
3
to give 1,4-di(thiophene-2-yl)butane-1,4-dione, according to
literature [29], followed by condensation of dione with 2-
Graphical User Interface [32] was used to generate input files and
to produce graphs from output files, including UV–vis spectra.
amino-1H-benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3(2H)-dione.
A solution of
1,4-di(thiophen-2-yl)butane-1,4-dione(63 mg, 0.25 mmol), N-
amino-1,8-naphthalimide (53 mg, 0.25 mmol) and p-TSA (5 mg,
0.25 mmol) in dry toluene (6 mL) was heated under reflux for 20 h
2.5. X-ray single crystal measurement
The crystal chosen for X-ray analysis was a deep red block with
the approximate dimensions of 1 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm. C24H14N2O2S2,
(426.49 g mol−1) crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space
˚
under nitrogen atmosphere in the presence of molecular sieves 4 A.
After completion of the reaction molecular sieves were filtered off
and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude
product was purified by column chromatography eluting with
˚
˚
˚
group P21/c, a = 12.4258 (25) A, b = 9.3899 (19) A, c = 16.7899 (34) A,
◦
3
−1
˚
ˇ=95.672 (30) , V = 1949.40 (7) A , Z = 4, ꢁ(Mo K␣) = 0.277 mm ,
CH2Cl2 to give of red solid. Yield: 50% (50 mg). Mp 265–267 ◦C; 1
H
and Dcalcd = 1.453 cm−3. A total of 3807 reflections were collected
to 2ꢂmax = 31.02◦ (h: −13 → 13, k: 0 → 10, l: 0 → 18), of which
2703 were unique. In refinements, weights were used according
to the scheme w = 1/[ꢃ2(Fo2) + (0.1453P)2], where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3.
The refinement of 322 parameters (data-to-parameter ratio being
8.4) converged to the final agreement factors R = 0.0677 for 1904
reflections with Fo > 4ꢃ(Fo) and Rw = 0.2201, and S = 1.208 for all
observed reflections. The electron density of the largest difference
NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, ı): 8.66 (dd, J = 7.3, 1.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 8.30
(dd, J = 8.3, 1.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.80 (dd, J = 8.3, 7.3 Hz, 2H, Ar–H),
7.06 (dd, J = 3.7, 1.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.02 (dd, J = 5.1, 1.2 Hz, 2H,
Ar-H), 6.85 (dd, J = 5.1, 3.7 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.66 (s, 2H, Ar–H); 13C
NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3, ␦): 162.63, 135.20, 132.71, 132,08, 132.04,
129.00, 128.27, 127.28, 127.17, 124.81, 124.66, 121.98, 109.22; IR:
ꢀ = 3104 (C–H Ar), 2919 (C–H Ar), 1722 (C=O), 1698 (C=O), 1581
(C–C Ar), 1504 (C–H Het), 1373 (C–N–C), 1072 (C–H Het) cm−1
;
peak was found to be 0.51 e A−3, while that of the largest differ-
˚
ESI–MS (m/z (%)): 426.4 (100) [M]+, 449.4 (60)[M + Na]+.
ence hole was −0.53 e A−3.Measurements of diffraction intensities
˚
were performed on a KUMA KM4 four-circle diffractometer, Mo K␣
radiation, ω/2ꢂ scan mode, ꢂ range 7.8–31.02◦; temperature of
the measured crystals: 293 K. Detailed crystallographic data for the
structure of 2a has been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallo-
graphic Data Centre as supplementary publication CCDC 910970.
yl)phenoxy)phenyl)-1H-benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3(2H)-dione(2b)
The monomer was obtained in two steps. (4-(2,5-di(thiophen-2-
yl)-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-4ꢀ-aminodiphenyl) ether was obtained accord-
ing to the literature [30], and next it was condensed with naphthalic
1,8-anhydride according to the same procedure as compound 2
(solvent: AcOH). The product was purified by column chromatog-
raphy eluting with CH2Cl2.to give pale yellow solid. Yield: 25%. Mp
245–247 ◦C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ı): 8.66 (dd, J = 7.3, 1.0 Hz,
2H, Ar–H), 8.29 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.81 (dd, J = 8.3, 7.3 Hz,
2H, Ar–H), 7.32 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.24–7.19 (m, 2H,
Ar–H), 7.18–7.13 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 7.09 (dd, J = 5.1, 1.1 Hz, 2H, Ar–H),
6.86 (dd, J = 5.1, 3.6 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.64 (dd, J = 3.6, 1.1 Hz, 2H, Ar–H),
6.54 (s, 2H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3, ␦): 164.43, 157.16,
144.31, 142,47, 134.35, 134.07, 131.70, 131.57, 130.58, 130.19,
127.75, 127.07, 126.89, 124.39, 124.16, 120.87, 119.89, 119.39,
114.18, 109.77; IR: ꢀ = 3072 (C–H Ar), 2920, (C–H Ar), 1705 (C=O),
1663 (C=O), 1588 (C–C Ar), 1498 (C–H Het), 1374 (C–N–C), 1234
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis of monomers
2,5-dimethoxytetrahydrofurane, while monomer 2a and 2b were
prepared from 1,4-di(thiophene-2-yl)butane-1,4-dione. The latter
was synthesized by Friedel Crafts acylation of thiophene with 1,4-
dichlorobutanedione as shown in (Scheme 1). The structures of the
compounds were confirmed by 1H, 13C NMR and ESI-MS analyses.
3.2. Single crystal structure analysis
(C–O–C) cm−1
.
Single crystal of 2a suitable for structural analysis was obtained
after recrystallization from the dichloromethane/hexane mixture.
The crystal belongs to the monoclinic space group P21/c with 4
molecules in the unit cell. The unit cell parameters are: a =◦12.4258
2.3. Spectroelectrochemical measurements
Electrosynthesis and studies on polymer films were per-
formed on CH Instrument Electrochemical Analyzer model 620,
in dichloromethane (Sigma Aldrich ≥99.8%) or acetonitrile (POCH
99.9%) containing 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophospate
(Sigma Aldrich) as supporting electrolyte. Polymer films were syn-
thesized at a platinum wire or ITO electrodes, with a scan rate
of 0.1 V s−1. An Ag pseudo-reference electrode was used and its
potential was standardized versus ferrocene. Platinum electrode
served as a counter electrode. Spectral and fluorescence mea-
surements were carried out using respectively an UV–vis Hewlett
Packard 8453 spectrophotometer and a Hitachi f-2500 fluorescence
spectrophotometer. Electron spin resonance investigation utilised
a JEOL JES FA 200, X-band CW-EPR spectrometer, operating at
100 kHz field modulation.
˚
(25), b = 9.3899 (19), c = 16.7899 (34) A, ˇ = 95.672 (30) . Fig. 2
shows the molecular structure of 2a. The whole molecule is not
coplanar. It can be divided into two nearly orthogonal planes, one
of which contains the pyrrole with adjacent thiophene rings, and
the other one the naphthalimide ring. Torsion angle between adja-
cent thiophene and pyrrole rings C(10)–C(9)–C(8)–C(7) is equal to
10.69◦. The naphthalimide unit is twisted out of the pyrrole plane
with the torsion angle along C(5)–N(1)–N(2)–C(24) equal to 87.80◦.
One of the thiophene rings contains a disorder. Atoms: S2, C3ꢀꢀ and
corresponding S2ꢀ, C3ꢀꢀꢀ sustain the planarity of the thiophene ring
with intact position of the C4 atom. Atom C3ꢀ was found in order
to achieve the best refinement, however, it causes the nonaromatic
share of the disorder by adapting non-planar positions with respect
to the other atoms.
2.4. Calculations
3.3. Fluorescence
Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations were performed
using GAUSSIAN09 [31] package. Geometry optimization per-
formed at 6-31G(d,p) DFT B3LYP level of theory, excited states and
UV–vis spectra were obtained from a TDDFT run. GABEDIT 2.3.6
Fluorescence spectra of the studied monomers registered in
CH2Cl2 are presented in Fig. 3, whereas important information is
extricated into Table 1. Strong fluorescence was found for com-
pounds 1a, 1b and 2a, exhibiting slightly differing emission bands.
Please cite this article in press as: P. Ledwon, et al., Synthesis and electrochemical properties of novel, donor–acceptor pyrrole derivatives with