New Hole Transporting Materials Based on Hexaarylbenzene and Aromatic Amine Moiety for OLEDs
Kim et al.
Table I. EL performances of multilayered devices with the synthesized compounds at 20 mA/cm2 and the optical, electrical and thermal properties
of the synthesized materials.
Hole transporting
materials
ELamax (nm) C.E.b (cd/A) E.Q.Ec (%) C.I.Ed (x, y) UVemax (nm) HOMO (eV) LUMO (eV) Egf (eV) Tgg (ꢀC) Tdh (ꢀC)
DPAP-TB
1-PNAP-TB
2-PNAP-TB
NPB
533
533
533
533
3.98
4.62
4.22
4.04
1.35
1.56
1.43
1.37
0.356, 0.543
0.356, 0.543
0.356, 0.543
0.356, 0.543
309
316
322
348
5.27
5.31
5.25
5.34
1.97
2.18
2.16
2.40
3.30
3.13
3.09
2.94
118
133
125
104
394
396
400
378
Notes: aELmax: Electroluminescent spectrum maximum peak; bC.E.: Current efficiency, cE.Q.E: External quantum efficiency; dCIE: Commission internationale de l’Eclairage;
eFilm on glass; f Eg (band gap) calculated from the optical absorption edge; gꢀh: Measured by DSC and TGA at a heating rate of 10 ꢀC/min.
were calculated as shown in Table I.7 LUMO values of
DPAP-TB, 1-PNAP-TB and 2-PNAP-TB were −1.97 eV,
−2.18 eV and −2.16 eV. All three compounds showed
higher LUMO levels than NPB, which is commercialized
as HTL. Through a higher LUMO level, electron block-
ing to hole transporting layer is available when electron
is injected to emitting layer. Based on the electron block-
ing effect, luminescence in HTL layer can be prevented
and EML layer would be only allowed to emit. HOMO
values of DPAP-TB, 1-PNAP-TB and 2-PNAP-TB were
−5.27 eV, −5.31 eV and −5.25 eV. TGA and DSC were
measured to identify thermal properties of the synthesized
materials. Glass transition temperature (Tgꢁ and initial ther-
mal degradation temperature (Tdꢁ of the materials are sum-
marized in Table I. Synthesized materials exhibited high Tg
in the range of 118 to 133 ꢀC. These values are higher than
that of NPB, which is commonly used as a hole transport-
ing material.8
Non-doped OLED devices were fabricated using the syn-
thesized materials or NPB (20 nm) as a hole transport
layer. Device configuration is ITO/PEDOT:PSS (40 nm)/
synthesized materials or NPB (20 nm)/Alq3 (70 nm)/LiF
(1 nm)/Al (200 nm). EL performances of the devices are
described and summarized in Figure 2 and Table I.
Luminance efficiency and external quantum efficiency
of the devices were 3.98, 4.62, 4.22 cd/A and 1.35, 1.56,
1.43%, respectively, when DPAP-TB, 1-PNAP-TB and
2-PNAP-TB were used as a HTL in the devices. These are
comparable efficiencies compared to 4.04 cd/A and 1.37%
of NPB, a commercialized HTL material. The reason for
increased efficiencies of two compounds, 1-PNAP-TB and
Delivered by Publishing Technology to: Florida State University, College of Medicine
2-PNAP-TB seems to be caused by the increased LUMO
IP: 109.241.99.10 On: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 11:13:41
Copyright: American ScleievneltsificwPhiucbhlisphreovrside electron blocking effect between
HTL and EML.
Among three synthesized new compounds, 1-PNAP-TB
showed the highest efficiency. It can’t be explained by
clear reason, but it may be due to the improved charge
balance in this device configuration. Also, 1-PNAP-TB is
appropriate as a candidate of commercialized HTL mate-
rial in solution-processed OLED because it has high Tg
ꢀ
value of 133 C. High Tg value can support device relia-
bility and long life-time.
4. CONCLUSION
New hole transporting materials, DPAP-TB, 1-PNAP-
TB, and 2-PNAP-TB including hexaaryl benzene moiety,
were synthesized by Sonogashira coupling and Diels-Alder
reaction. UV-Vis. spectra in film state of the three com-
pounds, DPAP-TB, 1-PNAP-TB and 2-PNAP-TB, showed
maximum values of 309 nm, 316 nm and 322 nm. Tg of the
ꢀ
synthesized materials were more than 10 C higher than
that of NPB. EL devices of DPAP-TB, 1-PNAP-TB and
2-PNAP-TB were fabricated by solution process. Lumi-
nance and external quantum efficiencies of DPAP-TB,
1-PNAP-TB and 2-PNAP-TB were 3.98, 4.62, 4.22 cd/A,
and 1.35, 1.56, 1.43%, respectively. In the luminance effi-
ciency result, 1-PNAP-TB especially had superior prop-
erty to NPB. Luminance efficiency and external quantum
efficiency were increased over 1.2 times in 1-PNAP-TB
Figure 2. Device performances (a) Luminance efficiency of the devices
(b) External quantum efficiency of the devices.
6384
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 14, 6382–6385, 2014