2726
G. Revelant et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 24 (2014) 2724–2727
thiadiazole series (compounds 3e and 3i). Moreover, thiosemicar-
bazides and their corresponding 5-aryl-2-(3-thienylamino)-1,3,4-
thiadiazoles might have different cellular targets as highlighted
by the different dose-response curve profiles.
Acknowledgments
We thank the ‘Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la
Recherche’ for Ph.D. grants to G.R. and C.G. and the Belgian Brain
Tumor Support for its financial support. The authors also would
like to thank Robert Kiss for fruitful discussions.
.
Supplementary data
Figure 1. Dose–response curves of A549 NSCLC cells treated with 2a–m
compounds (black lines) or 3a–m compounds (gray dotted lines) as established
after MTT colorimetric assay.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
04.043. These data include MOL files and InChiKeys of the most
important compounds described in this article.
2a–m, with a ‘plateau’ phase (Fig. 1, dotted gray lines as compared
to black lines) indicating that increasing drug concentration, at
least till 100 lM, did not lead to any improvement of the activity.
References and notes
Generally, thiadiazoles were nevertheless able to decrease partially
the global growth of cancer cells. So, to evaluate the antiprolifera-
tive potential of thiadiazoles 3a–m, we reported nevertheless in
brackets in Table 1 the first tested concentration for which there
remains less than 50% of viable cells after treatment. Marked dif-
ferences of sensitivity between cell lines could be observed. Again
the most sensitive cell line is B16F10 (five compounds with IC50
19. Spectral data of some potent derivatives: 1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-4-[5-(4-
methylphenyl)-3-thienyl]thiosemicarbazide (2g). Yield 96%; beige solid; mp
209 °C; 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) dH 2.30 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.82 (s, 3 H, OCH3),
7.03 (d, 2H, 2 Â CH, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.21 (d, 2H, 2 Â CH, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.46 (d, 2H,
2 Â CH, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.57 (s, 1H, CH), 7.66 (s, 1H, CH), 7.93 (d, 2H, 2 Â CH,
J = 7.5 Hz), 9.68 (s, 1H, NH), 9.88 (s, 1H, NH), 10.37 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR
(62,5 MHz, DMSO-d6) dC 20.7, 55.4, 96.8, 101.8, 113.5, 120.9, 124.6, 124.8,
129.7, 129.8, 130.8, 131.5, 137.1, 137.8, 162.1, 165.7; HRMS (APCI): m/z calcd
for [C20H17N3O2S+H]+: 364.1114; found: 364.1120. 2-(5-Phenyl-3-
thienylamino)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole (3f). Yield 88%; brown
solid; mp 264 °C; 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) dH 3.81 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.05 (d,
2H, 2 Â CH, J = 10 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, CH, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.37 (d, 1H, CH, J = 1.5 Hz),
7.43 (t, 2H, 2 Â CH, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.54 (d, 1H, CH, J = 1.5 Hz), 7.63 (d, 2H, 2 Â CH,
J = 7.5 Hz), 7.78 (d, 2H, 2 Â CH, J = 10 Hz), 10.81 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR
(62,5 MHz, DMSO-d6) dC 55.4, 105.8, 114.6, 116.9, 122.9, 125.2, 127.9, 128.2,
129.2, 133.3, 138.8, 142.1, 157.5, 160.7, 163.1; HRMS (APCI): m/z calcd for
[C19H15N3OS2+H]+: 366.0729; found: 366.0730. 2-[5-(4-Methylphenyl)-3-
thienylamino]-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole (3i). Yield 98%; brown
solid; mp 240 °C; 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) dH 2.31 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.87 (d,
2H, 2 Â CH, J = 8.75 Hz), 7.23 (d, 2H, 2 Â CH, J = 8.75 Hz), 7.30 (s, 1H, CH), 7.48
(s, 1H, CH), 7.51 (d, 2H, 2 Â CH, J = 8.75 Hz), 7.66 (d, 2H, 2 Â CH, J = 8.75 Hz),
10.01 (s, 1H, OH), 10.72 (s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (62,5 MHz, DMSO-d6) dC 20.7,
105.0, 115.9, 116.3, 121.4, 125.0, 128.3, 129.7, 131.5, 137.4, 138.8, 142.2, 157.9,
<12
pounds under study) whereas ten thiadiazoles displayed rather
no cytotoxic activity on SKMEL-28 cell line (IC50 >100 M; mean
IC50 concentration of >83 M considering all compounds under
lM; mean IC50 concentration of 7 lM considering all com-
l
l
study). Three thiadiazoles (3f, 3h and 3i) showed potent antiprolif-
erative activity on the six cell line panel with classical dose-
response curves. Thiadiazole 3f containing a 5-phenylthienylamino
substituent at C-2 and a 4-methoxyphenyl at C-5 exhibited growth
inhibition on five cancer cell lines with IC50 below 10
cell lines (Hs 683, IC50 = 5 M; A549, IC50 = 8 M; B16F10, IC50 = 6 -
M). In the same way, thiadiazole 3i containing a 5-(4-methyl-
lM for three
l
l
l
phenyl)thienylamino substituent at C-2 and a 4-hydroxyphenyl
at C-5 showed growth inhibition on all cancer cell lines with IC50
below 10
M; MCF-7, IC50 = 8
played a mean IC50 concentration of 31
lines under study but only one IC50 <10
l
M for four cell lines (U373, IC50 = 8
M; B16F10, IC50 = 6 M). Thiadiazole 3h dis-
M on the six cancer cell
M on B16F10 cell line.
lM; A549, IC50 = 6 -
l
l
l
l
l
Thiadiazoles 3e and 3g with 5-(4-methylphenyl)thienylamino sub-
stituent at C-2 and respectively a 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl and a 4-
methoxyphenyl at C-5 were also potent on almost all cancer cell
lines with respectively mean IC50 concentration of 2 and 17
on the six cancer cell lines under study.
lM
In conclusion, we have synthesized 26 new compounds and
evaluated their in vitro antiproliferative properties on a panel of
six cancer cell lines. Among them, two 5-aryl-2-(3-thienylami-
no)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles (3f and 3i) have shown very interesting
results with IC50 <10
lM on three cell lines and one thiosemicarba-
zide (2g) with a mean IC50 of 11
l
M on the six cancer cell line
panel. Presence of 5-(4-methylphenyl)thienylamino substituent
at C-2 instead of phenylthienylamino seems to enhance activity
in both series (mean IC50 concentrations on the six cancer cell line
panel are always lower for compounds with 5-(4-methyl-
phenyl)thienylamino substituent at C-2). Having a 4-methoxy-
phenyl group at C-5 gave potent compounds in both series
(compounds 2g and 3g) whereas 4-hydroxyphenyl and 3,4,5-tri-
methoxyphenyl moieties at C-5 increased activity only in