78
I. Bryndal et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1068 (2014) 77–83
Table 1
properties [5,6]. The method is based on acid–base hydrogen bond
interactions and molecular recognition. A molecular crystal is build
from an inorganic or organic acid and an organic base (chromophore
molecule). It is assumed that the acid part is responsible for favor-
able mechanical and thermal properties, due to strong hydrogen
bond interactions which stabilize the crystal lattice [6]. The organic
part, due to its relatively high hyperpolarizability value, is mainly
responsible for nonlinear optical properties of the crystal [4]. Per-
haps it would be interesting to notice that the hydrogen bond also
plays a important role in the creation of non-centrosymmetric
structures of crystals [7] and contributes to the molecular qua-
dratic hyperpolarizability of such systems [8–11].
We previously characterized the molecular complexes of
amides (nicotinamide and isonicotinamide) with 3-nitrophenol
[12]. Both complexes do not involve proton transfer, but reveal
features to distinguish the co-crystals. The primary direct
N(pyridine)Á Á ÁH–O(hydroxyl) hydrogen bonding is found in the
isonicotinamide co-crystal. On the contrary, the nicotinamide
co-crystal contains O(hydroxyl)–HÁ Á ÁO(carboxyl) and N(amine)–
HÁ Á ÁN(pyridine) hydrogen bonds and also shows relatively efficient
second harmonic frequency generation [12].
In the present paper we have replaced 3-nitrophenol by very
strong 5-sulfosalicylic acid which contains five O–H bonds in three
substituent groups (the sulfonic, carboxylic and phenolic groups),
and it may give mono-, di- or tri-anionic ligand species through
deprotonation, and may be useful to build potentially optical mate-
rials. Furthermore with deprotonation of sulfonic group, the three
oxygen atoms provide an additional set of potential acceptor sites
for hydrogen bonding associations. With these adducts three-
dimensional hydrogen bonding network are common, although
Crystal data and structure refinement for salts 1 and 2.
1
2
Empirical formula
Moiety formula
Formula weight (g)
Temperature (K)
k (Å)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions (Å, °)
C
13H12N2O7S
C13H14N2O8S
C6H7N2O+ÁC7H5O6SÀ C6H7N2O+ÁC7H5O6SÀÁH2O
340.31
358.32
90(2)
100(2)
0.71073
Orthorhombic
Pca21
a = 16.141(7)
b = 6.720(2)
c = 12.628(5)
1369.7(9)
4
0.71073
Orthorhombic
Pbca
a = 13.457(3)
b = 12.651(3)
c = 16.790(4)
2858.4(12)
8
Volume (Å3)
Z
Absorption coefficient
0.279
0.277
(mmÀ1
)
Calculated density
(mg mÀ3
F(000)
Crystal size (mm)
h range (°)
1.650
1.665
)
704
1488
0.45 Â 0.25 Â 0.14
0.26 Â 0.24 Â 0.09
2.86–28.78
À17 6 h 6 15
À17 6 k 6 10
À21 6 l 6 13
8385
4.9–35.0
Index ranges
À26 6 h 6 20
À9 6 k 6 8
À20 6 l 6 14
15,436
4257, 0.044
3097
Collected reflections
Unique reflections, Rint
Observed reflections
3303, 0.022
2782
[I > 2r(I)]
Parameters
223
1.001
0.0389
0.0726
238
1.029
0.0337
0.0870
Goodness-of-fit on F2
R1 [I > 2
wR2 [all data]
r
(I)]
Largest diff. peak and hole
0.37 and À0.53
0.38 and À0.45
(e ÅÀ3
)
cation–cation or cation–anion aromatic ring
p–p interactions are
rare. The self-assembly process of crystallization often requires
the incorporation of water molecules in these structures [13–16].
It was interesting to check the possibility to associate the sulfo-
nate groups to nicotinamide and isonicotinamide. This work deals
with the synthesis, crystal structure, spectroscopic studies and
optical characterization of new one proton transfer compounds,
namely nicotinamidium 3-carboxy-4-hydroxybenzenesulfonate,
1, and isonicotinamidium 3-carboxy-4-hydroxybenzenesulfonate
monohydrate, 2.
diffractometer with Onyx (for 1) or Ruby (for 2) CCD camera. The
intensity data were collected at 100(2) and 90(2) K, respectively
for 1 and 2, using graphite-monochromatized Mo K radiation
a
(k = 0.71073 Å). Data collection, cell refinement, and data reduction
and analysis were carried out with the Xcalibur PX software (Cry-
sAlis PRO) [17].
The structures were solved by direct methods using the SHEL-
XS-97 program [18] and refined on F2 by full-matrix least squares
with anisotropic thermal parameters for all non-H atoms using
SHELXL-97 [18]. All H atoms were found in difference Fourier maps
and were refined isotropically. In the final refinement cycles, the C-
bonded H atoms were positioned geometrically and treated as rid-
ing atoms, with C–H = 0.95 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(Caryl). The
N- and O-bonded H atoms were refinement with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N)
and 1.5 Ueq(O), respectively.
Complete crystallographic data for the structural analysis have
been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre;
CCDC reference numbers 968379-968380. These data can be
ing.html (or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12
Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (+44) 1223 336033;
e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.uk).
Experimental
Synthesis
Nicotinamide (NA), isonicotinamide (INA) and 5-sulfosalicylic
acid (5-SSA) are commercial reagents from Fluka. Reagents and sol-
vents were used as purchased without further purification. The tar-
get compounds were prepared by dissolving a 1:1 ratio of 5-SSA
(0.213 g) and, respectively, NA and INA (0.100 g) in 10 ml of meth-
anol–water mixture (1:2) and heated to dissolve the solid. When
the solutions became homogeneous, they were cooled and crystals
of nicotinamidium 3-carboxy-4-hydroxybenzenesulfonate, 1, and
isonicotinamidium 3-carboxy-4-hydroxybenzenesulfonate mono-
hydrate, 2, were obtained by slow evaporation. Elemental analysis,
IR spectra and X-ray structural investigations confirmed the chem-
ical formulae of the title compounds. 1: C13H12N2O7S found C,
45.93; H, 3.48; N, 8.17; S, 9.76%; 2: C13H14N2O8S found C, 43.43;
H, 3.86; N, 7.89; S, 8.94%.
Spectroscopic measurements
The FT-IR powder spectra of both complexes were recorded on a
Bruker IFS-88 spectrometer with a resolution of 2 cmÀ1 using sam-
ples in KBr pellets at room temperature.
X-ray data collection
SHG measurements
Details of data collections, analyses and refinements for the
studied crystals are given in Table 1. The crystallographic measure-
ments for 1 and 2 were performed on a Xcalibur PX four-circle
The quadratic NLO response of compounds 1 and 2 was evalu-
ated by performing second harmonic generation (SHG) on powder