3
filtered correlation spectroscopy (DQFCOSY) and nuclear
Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY). The assignments
were made with the help of DQFCOSY and NOESY
experiments (Figure. 3). The large coupling constants between
As depicted in Table 3, 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde (entry
g, Table 3) gave higher yields than simple salicylaldehyde
(entry a, Table 3).
This method provides a variety of 1-(tetrahydropyran-3-
yl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran and hexahydropyrano[3,2-
c]chromene derivatives in good yields with excellent
diastereoselectivity. The high stereoselectivity is achieved by
the trapping of a more stable benzylic carbocation with a
tethered hydroxyl group approaching from the less sterically
hindered equatorial side of the more stable chair
conformation. Furthermore, intramolecular cyclizations are
highly favorable and faster than the intermolecular reactions.
All the products were characterized and confirmed by NMR,
IR and mass spectrometry.11
3
H5-H6 ( 4.44 ppm, JH5-H6 = 9.9 Hz), H5-H10 ( 5.74 ppm,
3JH5-H10 = 10.8 Hz) along with the presence of NOE cross
peaks between H6/H10, H5/H(ortho-Ph) suggest that H5, H6
and H10 are relatively in trans orientation to each other as
represented in Figure 3.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated an intramolecular
version of Prins cyclization for the stereoselective synthesis of
1-(tetrahydropyran-3-yl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran and trans-
fused hexahydropyrano[3,2-c]chromene derivatives under
mild conditions. This approach generates two heterocyclic
rings with three new stereogenic centers in a one-pot
operation.
Figure 3. Characteristic NOE cross correlations of 3a
Encouraged by the above results, we extendend our
efforts to study the effect of various salicyladehydes
containing different electron withdrawing and donating
substituents. As shown in Table 3, the corresponding trans-
fused hexahydropyrano[3,2-c]chromene derivatives were
obtained in good to excellent yields. The substituents present
on the aromatic ring had shown some effect on the
conversion. It was observed that both activated (entry d, Table
3) and deactivated salicylaldehydes (entry e, Table 3) gave the
products in slightly lower yields than halogenated aromatic
counterparts (entries b and c, Table 3).
Acknowledgments
CH.S.S acknowledges DRDO, New Delhi for providing
financial assistance (ERIP/ER/1103894M/01/1346). M.R.R
thanks CSIR, New Delhi for the award of a senior research
fellowship.
Supplementary data
Table 3. Synthesis of hexahydropyrano[3,2-c]chromenesa
Supplementary data (compound characterization) associated
with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://
dx.doi.
References and notes
1. a) Jovanovic, S. V.; Steenken, S.; Boone, C. W.; Simic, M. G. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9677; b) Gewali, M. B.; Tezuka, Y.;
Banskota, A. H.; Ali, M. S.; Saiki, I.; Dong, H.; Kadota, S. Org.
Lett. 1999, 1, 1733; c) Masuda, H.; Ishikado, A.; Nishida, N.;
Ninomiya, K.; Fujiwara, H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yoshikawa, M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 2939; d) Tezuka, Y.; Gewali,
M. B.; Ali, M. S.; Banskota, A. H.; Kadota, S. J. Nat. Prod. 2001,
64, 208.
2. a) Mitsui, S.; Kobayashi, S.; Nagahori, H.; Ogiso, A. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 1976, 24, 2377; b) Chan, M. M.; Huang, H. I.;
Fenton, M. R.; Fong, D. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1998, 55, 1955; c)
Masuda, H.; Ishikado, A.; Nishida, N.; Ninomiya, K.; Fujiwara,
H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yoshikawa, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1998, 8, 2939.
3. For recent reviews on the Prins reaction, see: a) Olier, C.;
Kaafarani, M.; Gastaldi, S. S.; Bertrand, M. P. Tetrahedron 2010,
66, 413; b) Pastor, I. M.; Yus, M. Curr. Org. Chem. 2007, 11, 925;
c) Crane, E. A.; Scheidt, K. A. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 2010, 122,
8494.
4. a) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Maity, T.; Kumar, G. G. K. S. N.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7155; b) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Thomas,
C. R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1217; c) Miranda, P. O.; Ramirez, M. A.;
Martin, V. S.; Padron, J. I. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1633; d) Bolla, M.
L.; Patterson, B.; Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
16044; e) Barry, C. S.; Bushby, N.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Elsworth,
J. D.; Harding, J. R.; Willis, C. L. Chem. Commun. 2005, 40,
5097; f) Borkar, P.; Weghe, P. V. D.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Yadav, J.
S.; Gree, R. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 9016.
5. a) Gesinski, M. R.; Tadpetch, K.; Rychnovsky, S. D. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 5342; b) Kwon, M. S.; Woo, S. K.; Na, S. W.; Lee, E.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1733; c) Manaviazar, S.; Hale, K.
J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8786.
6. a) Wender, P. A.; Schrier, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133,
9228; b) Woo, S. K.; Kwon, M. S.; Lee, E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 3242; c) Gesinski, M. R.; Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Am.
aReaction was performed at 0.5 mmol scale with respect to aldehyde
bIsolated yield