Organic Letters
Letter
water content, which allowed for development of a more robust
process. After 30 min at room temperature, the reaction
mixture was quenched by careful addition of water. Azeotropic
distillation and a solvent switch to IPAc was followed by
crystallization and isolation of 5 crystallized in 60−70% yield.
In contrast to the excellent selectivity observed for O-
unprotected 4, the reduction of 13b−c using BF3·OEt2
generated significant amounts of α-anomers with a β/α ratio
of 5−7:1. Using AlCl3 as a Lewis acid provided no
improvements, as we anticipated that a possible chelation
effect may restrict the confirmation which would enhance the
anomeric effect (Table 1). The reduction of substrate 13a with
BF3·OEt2 was very sluggish, even after the addition of water as
described in the literature.14 AlCl3 was proven to be much more
effective, giving the desired product 16a in 15:1 selectivity.
In order to confirm the relative stereochemistry and obtain
material for use as an analytical standard, β/α-anomeric
mixtures of 16b−c were used to prepare quantities of the
pure α-anomer 18 (Scheme 4). Deprotection of O-tetra-allyl
Table 2. Formation of Impurity 19
Grignard
(equiv)
a
a
b
entry
4 (area %) 19 (area %) isolated yield of 19
1
2
3
4
1.1
1.2
1.5
2.2
84
75
41
<1
<3
10
38
77
/
/
20
57
a
b
Area % by HPLC of the reaction mixture. Crystallization from
MeOH.
side. The selectivity of reduction of O-unprotected glycopyr-
anosides to β-C-glycosides was also better understood. The
one-stage process involves four chemical transformations from
2 to 5 without isolation of intermediates and precise control
over the purity profile of the final drug substance.
Scheme 4. Preparation of α-Anomer 18
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
Spectroscopic data and copies of 1H/13C NMR spectra for 2a−
b, 4, 5, 6a/b−8a/b, 12, 13a−c, 15a/b, 16a/c, 18, 19. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Present Address
†Department of Process Development, Boehringer Ingelheim
GmbH & Co.KG, 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
protected 16c with a 7:1 of β/α ratio was performed using 10%
palladium on carbon in the presence of p-TsOH in n-propanol
at 90 °C for 5 days. The resulting product was transformed to
O-tetra-acetate 17c, which was further subjected to crystal-
lization in a 2:1 mixture of hexane/EtOAc in order to remove
the β-anomer. This sequence upgraded the filtrate α/β anomer
ratio to 5:1 from the original 1:7. The crude 17c filtrate was
then treated with hydrazine in THF, and α-anomer 18 of >99%
purity crystallized from a mixture of EtOAc and MTBE with an
overall yield of 3% from 16c.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) For a review, see: Chao, E. C.; Henry, R. R. Nat. Rev. Drug
Discovery 2010, 9, 551. (b) Xu, G.; et al. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 1236.
(c) Nomura, S.; Sakamaki, S.; Hongu, M.; Kawanishi, E.; Koga, Y.;
Sakamoto, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kiichiro Ueta, K.; Kimata, H.;
Nakayama, K.; Tsuda-Tsukimoto, M. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 6355.
(d) Meng, W.; Ellsworth, B. A.; Nirschl, A. A.; McCann, P. J.; Patel,
M.; Girotra, R. N.; Wu, G.; Sher, P. M.; Morrison, E. P.; Biller, S. A.;
Zahler, R.; Deshpande, P. P.; Pullockaran, A.; Hagan, D. L.; Morgan,
N.; Taylor, J. R.; Obermeier, M. T.; Humphreys, W. G.; Khanna, A.;
Discenza, L.; Robertson, J. G.; Wang, A.; Han, S.; Wetterau, J. R.; E,
B.; Oliver, P.; Flint, O. P.; Whaley, J. M.; Washburn, W. N. J. Med.
Chem. 2008, 51, 1145.
It is also noteworthy that a single diastereomeric impurity
was detected at various levels during the preparation of 4,
which was proven to be derived from the reduction of the
corresponding ring opening ketone 11a, in equilibrium with
11,12 by PrMgCl·LiCl (Table 2). The relative stereochemistry
i
of 19 was rationalized by the Felkin−Ann model13 and
supported by the stereochemistry of NaBH4 reduction of a α-
siloxyacetophenone.14 As indicated in Table 2, excess Grignard
reagent was closely correlated with increasing amounts of 19,
which became the major product when more than a 2-fold
15
i
(2) (a) For a report on the Dapagliflozin process, see: Deshpande,
P. P.; Singh, J.; Pullockaran, A.; Thomas Kissick, T.; Ellsworth, B. A.;
Jack, Z.; Gougoutas, J. Z.; Dimarco, J.; Fakes, M.; Reyes, M.; Lai, C.;
Lobinger, H.; Denzel, T.; Ermann, P.; Crispino, G.; Randazzo, M.;
Gao, Z.; Randazzo, R.; Lindrud, M.; Rosso, V.; Buono, F.; Wendel, W.;
Doubleday, W. W.; Leung, S.; Richberg, P.; Hughes, D.; Washburn, W.
N.; Meng, W.; Volk, K. J.; Mueller, R. H. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012,
16, 577. (b) For a report on the Canagliflozin process, see: Lemaire,
S.; Houpis, I. N.; Xiao, T.; Li, J.; Digard, E.; Gozlan, C.; Liu, R.;
excess of PrMgCl·LiCl was added (entry 4). Following this
i
investigation, the addition of PrMgCl·LiCl was strictly
controlled to minimize formation of 19 in the crude mixture
and allow for a better recovery of 5 at the end.
In summary, we have developed a concise, robust process for
the production of SGLT-2 inhibitor Empagliflozin (5) on a
metric ton scale. The synthesis features a highly β-selective
AlCl3-promoted silane reduction of a methyl β-glycopyrano-
4092
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol501755h | Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 4090−4093