Organic Letters
Letter
3370 cm−1 region (intramolecular hydrogen bond of N−H···
OC type). The low-frequency band observed at the 3370
cm−1 in tripeptide 10 shifted to a lower wavenumber of 3320
cm−1 in octapeptide 15, and its intensity increased steadily
with peptide elongation. These results were very similar to
those of Ac5c-based peptides, which adopt a helical structure in
solution.4a,e,6b,7b,8a
We then investigated the secondary structures of Boc-
protected peptides 9−15 (n = 2−8) in 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol
(TFE) solution (0.1 mM) using circular dichroism (CD)
spectral measurements (Figure 4). From dipeptide 9 to
Figure 5. 1H NMR spectra (NH region) of Boc-protected
heptapeptide 14 at seven different temperatures (60 to −40 °C) in
CD3CN (600 MHz).
ROESY NMR spectrum of heptapeptide 14 was also measured
at −25 °C (Figure S2c,d) but did not provide information on a
preferred peptide secondary structure. The peptides in this
study have no α-hydrogen, and thus we obtained less available
information about peptide secondary structures. Taken
together, Boc-protected longer peptides adopted several
conformers that were not a complete helical structure. To
evaluate the effect of the state of the pyrrolidine ring on the
peptide secondary structures, CD spectra of three heptapep-
tides including the Boc-protected peptide 14, HCl salt peptide
16, and free amine peptide 17 were measured in TFE solution
(0.1 mM). The CD spectrum of the free amine peptide 17
showed a negative maximum at 195 nm and a positive
maximum at 230 nm, which were not assigned to a specific
peptide secondary structure. In contrast, positive maxima at
206 and 224 nm were observed in the CD spectrum of the HCl
salt peptide 16, and they were stronger than those in the Boc-
protected peptide 14. These results suggested that the order of
the ability for helical conformation or helical screw sense to
one-handedness was HCl salt peptide 16 > Boc-protected
peptide 14 > free amine peptide 17. Note that the ratio of R
implied that the dominant conformation of HCl salt peptide
16 (R = 1.35) was a left-handed (M) α-helical structure. Aida
et al. reported the helical conformation of 4-aminopiperidine-
4-carboxylic acid (Api) oligopeptides.11 The state of the
piperidine ring in Api was very important for the helix-
formation ability of its oligopeptides; the order was protonated
> acylated > free base. Nonprotonated free amines appeared to
hamper the formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonds in the
peptide backbone. (S)-(−)-Cucurbitine had a secondary amine
in a manner similar to Api, and thus protonated (HCl salt)
peptide 16 might form a more stable left-handed (M) helical
structure than Boc-protected peptide 14 and free amine
peptide 17. Furthermore, the conformation of free amine
peptide 17 was analyzed via CD spectroscopy in aqueous
solution (0.1 mM) with various acids (10 mM) including HCl,
HBr, trifluoroacetic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, and
isobutyric acid. A secondary amine in the pyrrolidine ring was
protonated by additive acids. As shown in Figure S4, different
CD spectra were obtained according to the acids, and the
peptide formed the most stable left-handed (M) helical
structure in the presence of HCl. The order of pKa values of
additive acids is acetic acid ≃ propionic acid ≃ isobutyric acid
> trifluoroacetic acid > HCl > HBr, and thus there is no
correlation between the helical stability of the peptide and the
pKa value of additive acids. The reasons for this helical stability
Figure 4. CD spectra of (a) Cbz-[(S)-cucurbitine(Boc)]n-OEt (n = 2
(2 mer, 9), 3 (3 mer, 10), 4 (4 mer, 11), 5 (5 mer, 12), 6 (6 mer, 13),
7 (7 mer, 14), 8 (8 mer, 15)) and (b) heptapeptides ([Boc-protected
peptide (NBoc, 14), HCl salt peptide (NH·HCl, 16), and free amine
peptide (NH, 17)) in TFE solution. Peptide concentration: 0.1 mM.
hexapeptide 13, the CD spectra did not show characteristic
maxima (208 and 222 nm) for a helical structure. These
peptides might be too short to control the helical screw
direction to one-handedness. On the contrary, heptapeptide 14
and octapeptide 15 showed a negative maximum at 194 nm
and positive maxima at around 208 and 222 nm, which
indicated that the dominant conformation of both peptides in
TFE solution was a left-handed (M) helical structure.
Furthermore, the ratios of R (θn→π*/θπ→π*) of heptapeptide
14 and octapeptide 15 were 1.69 and 1.58, respectively,
suggesting that both peptides preferred α-helix to 310-helix.
However, the intensities of these spectra were too low to form
a complete left-handed (M) helical structure. These results
were similar to a previous report on (S)-Ac5c3EG homopep-
tides,8 and thus the helical screw-sense bias by the α-chiral
center of the Boc-protected (S)-(−)-cucurbitine was weak. To
gain further insights into the preferred secondary structures in
solution, detailed 1H NMR spectral measurements of
heptapeptide 14 were performed. The rotating frame Over-
hauser effect spectroscopy nuclear magnetic resonance
(ROESY NMR) spectrum of heptapeptide 14 measured at
60 °C showed no valuable ROE cross-peaks for peptide
signal at 6.75 ppm suggested that the peptide adopted a single
preferred conformer or several conformers in fast exchange.
Therefore, we measured the 1H NMR spectra of heptapeptide
14 at lowered temperatures. The peak of the N(1)−H proton
first broadened (from 60 to 25 °C) and then was split (from 0
to −40 °C) into at least three peaks, indicating that more than
three conformers existed (Figure 5). Other proton signals also
implied the existence of several conformers (Figure S3). The
4360
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 4358−4362