Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
3) Primary aryl alkyl imines could undergo imine/enamine
tautomerization,[14] which may alter the chelation ability.
In this regard, few transformations that utilize primary
aryl alkyl imines as directing groups have been reported in
[15]
À
C H activation reactions.
In the last few years, cooperative catalytic systems have
À
attracted attention to enable C H bond activations that could
not previously be achieved by first-row transition-metal
catalysts.[16] Interestingly, we found that the addition of
catalytic amounts of B(C6F5)3 dramatically accelerates the
À
reaction rates and facilitates C H bond activation. Herein, we
III
À
report the first Lewis acid promoted Cp*Co -catalyzed C H
bond activation of imines with diazo compounds. Arguably,
this approach represents the first synthetic method toward
À
isoquinoline-3-ones through C H bond activation.
To examine whether NH imines are competent directing
III
À
groups for Cp*Co -catayzed C H activation with diazo
compounds, we selected 1-(p-tolyl)pentan-1-imine (1b) and
dimethyl 2-diazomalonate (2a) as model substrates. In an
initial set of experiments, silver salts and acetate bases were
investigated with a Cp*CoIII catalyst.[2,17] To our delight, the
desired product 3b and its transesterification derivative 3b’,
derived from the solvent, were formed in the presence of
CsOAc (10 mol%) and AgSbF6 (10 mol%) in 29% yield
(Table S1 in the Supporting Information). We suspected that
the reactivity could be improved by the presence of a Lewis
acid.[16] After extensive screening, we were pleased to find
that the yield of 3b/3b’ improves significantly up to 80% on
introduction of B(C6F5)3 (20 mol%), while other Lewis acids,
including Zn(OTf)2, Sc(OTf)3 and BF3·OEt2 were less effec-
tive (Table S1). Finally, it was found that the addition of silver
was not required for the reaction (Table S1). Structurally
similar substrates, including a range of ketoximes (N-OH, N-
OMe, N-OPiv) and N-PMP-substituted imines (PMP = N-p-
methoxyphenyl) did not give any desired product
(Table S1).[18]
Scheme 2. Substrate scope of primary ketimines and diazo com-
pounds. For the reaction conditions, see the Supporting Information.
TFE=2,2,2-trifluoroethanol.
With the optimized conditions in hand, the substrate
scope was investigated with various NH imines and diazo
compounds (Scheme 2). Electron-donating and -withdrawing
substituents on the aryl moiety were tolerated. The reaction
proceeded regioselectively when functional groups were
located at the meta and ortho positions. In a similar fashion,
m-naphthyl-substituted substrate 1i and heteroarene 1j were
also tolerated. Variation of the R1 substituents and alteration
of the diazo ester had little effect on the reaction efficiency.
Next, a variety of N-substituted imines were examined
under the optimized reaction conditions (Scheme 3). Pleas-
ingly, the reaction of N-methyl-1-phenylethan-1-imine (1’a)
proceeded smoothly to give 4a in 83% yield. Electronic
variation of the para- and meta-substituents on the aryl group
did not affect the reaction efficiency and afforded 4b–4 f. The
structure of 4c was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic
analysis.[19] The N-phenyl-substituted imine 1’g as well as the
aldimine 1’h were also competent substrates. Notably, product
4h is an important scaffold in natural compounds (Figure 1).
Other diazo compounds were also tolerated.
Scheme 3. Substrate scope of secondary ketimines, aldimines, and
diazo compounds. For the reaction conditions, see the Supporting
Information.
First, the stability of NH imine 1a was tested. Significant
decomposition (27%) of 1a was observed within 1 h in the
absence of a diazo compound under the optimized conditions
(see the Supporting Information). Previous conditions with
AgSbF6 gave 62% decomposition in the same time. It was,
therefore, concluded that an increased reaction rate was the
For a better understanding of the role of the reaction
additives, we conducted a series of experiments (Scheme 4).
5578
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5577 –5581