.
Angewandte
Communications
possessing bulky ligands of the XPhos family were employed
(Table 1, Entries 5 and 6). The best result was obtained with
[(tBuXPhos)Au]NTf2 (13), which allowed the complete con-
version of 10a in 3 h and the formation of 11a in an excellent
yield of 95% (Table 1, Entry 6). An additional improvement
was subsequently achieved: working at a lower catalyst
loading of 2 mol% in refluxing 1,2-dichloroethane reduced
the reaction time to 1.5 h while maintaining the efficiency of
the process (Table 1, Entry 7). Under these experimental
conditions, pyridine 11a could be isolated in an optimal yield
of 90%. Additional control experiments were also carried out
to show that the transformation could not be performed by
using AgNTf2 or HNTf2 as the catalyst, or under simple
thermal conditions (Table 1, Entries 9–12).[14]
The optimal catalytic conditions noted in Table 1, Entry 7
(2 mol% of 13 in (CH2)2Cl2 at 858C) were then applied to
a range of 2-propargyl 2H-azirine derivatives (10a–w) to
Scheme 2. A synthetic route to functionalized pyridines.
Compound 10a, which could be conveniently obtained by determine the scope of the reaction. As seen from the results
a four-step sequence from tert-butyl acetoacetate,[12] was first collected in Table 2, the transformation proved to be
treated with the simple [(Ph3P)Au]NTf2 complex[13] (5 mol%) extremely general and the corresponding functionalized
in CDCl3 at 508C and the reaction was monitored by 1H NMR pyridines 11a–w could be obtained in good to excellent
spectroscopy (Table 1, Entry 1). We were pleased to observe yields (62–99%). The substrates were completely consumed
the slow but clean conversion of 10a into the desired pyridine in generally less than 10 h with the exception of terminal
11a, which gradually accumulated to reach a moderate yield alkynes (10v,w), for which an extended reaction time was
of 40% after 3 h. A series of other gold complexes possessing required. The reaction could be performed with substrates
various electronic and steric properties were then screened in possessing aryl groups with either electron-donating (11d,r,s)
an attempt to increase both the rate and the yield of the or electron-withdrawing (11e,f) substituents, heteroaromatic
reaction. The main results of this study are compiled in moieties such as a furan (11n,p) or thiophene (11j), or alkyl
Entries 2–8 of Table 1. While [(JohnPhos)Au]NTf2, chains (11k–n). Substitutions were tolerated at the alkyne
[(IPr)Au]NTf2 and the phosphite-based gold(I) complex 12 terminus (C(6)), at the propargylic position (C(4)), and on the
proved to be less catalytically active (Table 1, Entries 2–4), azirine motif (C(2)) of the substrates, thus allowing the
a remarkable improvement was made when complexes formation even of tetrasubstituted pyridines (11t,u).
The transformation also proved to be compatible with the
presence of various commonly employed functionalities such
Table 1: First attempts at cyclization with azirine 10a and optimization
as esters (11a–w), halogen atoms (11g–i), ketals (11l), nitro
of the catalytic system.[a]
groups (11 f), and alkenes (11m). A series of general com-
ments can be made regarding the reactivity of the substrates.
First, it is notable that the reaction is selective and that despite
the use of regular 1,2-dichloroethane, no trace of amino
ketone products resulting from a Neber rearrangement[2]
could be observed. Nor could by-products resulting from
a potentially competitive gold-catalyzed nucleophilic addition
of the tert-butyloxycarbonyl group on the alkyne be
detected.[15]
Entry Catalyst[b]
Solvent
T
t
Conv.[c] Yield[d]
[8C] [h]
[%]
[%]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
[Ph3PAu]NTf2
[(JohnPhos)Au]NTf2 CDCl3
[(IPr)Au]NTf2
[(ArO)3PAu]NTf2
[(XPhos)Au]NTf2
[(tBuXPhos)Au]NTf2 CDCl3
[(tBuXPhos)Au]NTf2 (CH2Cl)2 85 1.5 100 95
CDCl3
50
50
50
50
50
50
3
3
3
3
3
3
42
33
18
35
90
40
28
17
32
82
CDCl3
CDCl3
CDCl3
While no general rule can be established, it is also
interesting to note that substrates such as 10k–m, which
[e]
possess alkyl substituents both at the alkyne terminus (C(6)
)
100 95
[f]
[g]
and on the azirine moiety (C(2)), tend to react comparatively
more slowly (> 10 h) than those possessing at least one
aromatic substituent at the same positions (compare, for
instance, 11k with 11a or 11n with 11p).[16] In line with this
observation, substrates 10p–s, which bear aromatic groups at
both C(2) and C(6), exhibited the highest reactivity with
conversions being complete in only 1 hour. Finally, it should
be noted that substrates 10t and 10u, which have substituents
at the propargylic position, were reacted as inseparable 1:1
mixtures of diastereoisomers. For 10t, the two diastereoiso-
mers, while leading to the formation of the same pyridine 11t,
were shown to react with different kinetics. One of the
(90%)[h]
8
9
10
11
12
AuCl3
AgNTf2
HNTf2
–
CD3CN
CDCl3
CDCl3
CDCl3
toluene
50
50
50
50
110
3
4
4
4
4
8
7
[i]
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
[i]
[i]
[i]
–
[a] Substrate concentration: 0.07m. [b] Catalyst loading 5 mol% except
for Entry 7. [c] Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. [d] Yield measured
by NMR spectroscopy. [e] Ar=2,6-(tBu)2-C6H3. [f] Catalyst loading
2 mol%. [g] Substrate concentration: 0.1m. [h] Yield of isolated product.
[i] No conversion observed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Tf=triflate,
XPhos=2-dicyclohexylphosphino-2’,4’,6’-triisopropylbiphenyl.
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!