Organic Letters
Letter
a
Table 3. Substrate Scope of Allylic Alcohols
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Authors
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
entry
substates
R
3
yield (%)
ee (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1h/2b
1h/2c
1h/2d
1h/2e′
1h/2f′
1j/2b
1j/2d
4-MeOC6H4
4-ClC6H4
3hb
3hc
3hd
3ha
3hb
3jb
95
98
89
93
93
93
88
88
86
76
90
87
90
94
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
4-CF3C6H4
C6H5
Financial support from Hundred Talent Program of Chinese
Academy of Sciences (CAS) and the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (21202175) is gratefully acknowledged.
4-MeOC6H4
4-MeOC6H4
4-CF3C6H4
3jd
REFERENCES
■
a
Reaction conditions: 1h or 1j (0.1 mmol), 2 or 2′ (0.12 mmol),
Pd2(dba)3 (3.0 mol %), P-1 (7.0 mol %), acid (5.0 mol %), 5 Å MS
(50 mg), toluene (2.0 mL), 60 °C, 12 h; all yields are isolated; ee were
determined by HPLC analysis.
(1) For selected reviews, see: (a) Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254,
1471. (b) Wender, P. A.; Miller, B. L. In Organic Synthesis: Theory and
Applications; Hudlicky, T., Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1993; Vol.
2, p 27. (c) Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 259.
(d) Wender, P. A.; Verma, V. A.; Paxton, T. J.; Pillow, T. H. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2008, 41, 40. (e) Newhouse, T.; Baran, P. S.; Hoffmann, R. W.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3010.
(2) (a) Tsuji, J. Transition Metal Reagents and Catalysts; Wiley: New
York, 2000. (b) Trost, B. M.; Crawley, M. L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103,
2921. (c) Kazmaier, U. Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 317. (d) Lu, Z.; Ma,
S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 258; Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 264.
(e) Norsikian, S.; Chang, C.-W. Curr. Org. Synth. 2009, 6, 264.
(f) Montserrat, D.; Oscar, P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 312. (g) Trost,
B. M.; Zhang, T.; Sieber, J. D. Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 427. (h) Zhang, W.;
Liu, D. In Chiral Ferrocenes in Asymmetric Catalysis: Synthesis and
Applications; Dai, L.-X., Hou, X.-L., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
2010; Chapter 14. (i) Weaver, J. D.; Recio, A., III; Grenning, A. J.;
Tunge, J. A. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1846. (j) Trost, B. M. Org. Process
Res. Dev. 2012, 16, 185. (k) Trost, B. M. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2013,
44, 1.
intermediate to facilitate acquiring a linear product regiose-
lectively.6c The reactions of 1j and 2b/2d gave better results,
affording 3jb and 3jd in 88−93% yields and 90−94% ee,
respectively (entries 6 and 7).
Remarkably, the direct allylic alkylation reaction can be easily
scaled up to gram scale. Consequently, the “one-pot” gram-
scale reaction of 1h (1.1 g) with 1.2 equiv of 2a under the
standard reaction conditions followed by in situ hydrolysis
smoothly provided the all-carbon quaternary allylic amino acid
derivative 4 in 81% yield and >99.5% ee after a single
recrystallization (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3. “One-Pot” Gram-Scale Reaction
(3) For recent selected advances, see: (a) Trost, B. M.; Xu, J.;
Reichle, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 282. (b) Mukherjee, S.; List,
B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11336. (c) Trost, B. M.; Xu, J.;
Schmidt, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18343. (d) Chen, J.-P.; Ding,
C.-H.; Liu, W.; Hou, X.-L.; Dai, L.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
15493. (e) Trost, B. M.; Miller, J. R.; Hoffman, C. M., Jr. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 8165. (f) Zhao, X.; Liu, D.; Guo, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19354. (g) Chen, J.-P.; Peng, Q.; Lei, B.-
L.; Hou, X.-L.; Wu, Y.-D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14180. (h) Cao,
Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Feng, X.; Zhuang, M.; Du, H. Org. Lett. 2011, 13,
2164. (i) Trost, B. M.; Thaisrivongs, D. A.; Hansmann, M. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11522. (j) Bartlett, M. J.; Turner, C. A.;
Harvey, J. E. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2430. (k) Yu, Y.; Yang, X.-F.; Xu, C.-
F.; Ding, C.-H.; Hou, X.-L. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3880. (l) Liu, W.-B.;
Reeves, C. M.; Virgil, S. C.; Stoltz, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
10626. (m) Quan, M.; Butt, N.; Shen, J.; Shen, K.; Liu, D.; Zhang, W.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 7412. (n) Huo, X.; Quan, M.; Yang, G.;
Zhao, X.; Liu, D.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1570.
(o) Butt, N.; Liu, D.; Zhang, W. Synlett 2014, 615. (p) Garcia, M. A.;
Frey, W.; Peters, R. Organometallics 2014, 33, 1068.
(4) (a) Trost, B. M.; Quancard, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6314.
(b) Jiang, G.; List, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9471. (c) Tao,
Z.-L.; Zhang, W.-Q.; Chen, D.-F.; Adele, A.; Gong, L.-Z. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2013, 135, 9255. (d) Huo, X.; Yang, G.; Liu, D.; Liu, Y.; Gridnev,
I. D.; Zhang, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 6776. For another
recent notable example for the direct allylation of α-branched aromatic
aldehydes with allylic alcohols catalyzed by dual-catalytic strategy, see:
(e) Krautwald, S.; Sarlah, D.; Schafroth, M. A.; Carreira, E. M. Science
2013, 340, 1065. For a review for Pd-catalyzed reactions of allylic
alcohols, see: (f) Muzart, J. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 4179.
In summary, we have demonstrated a direct and concise
allylic alkylation of azlactones with simple allylic alcohols
catalyzed by the combination of a palladium complex with a
commercially available Trost ligand and PhCO2H under mild
conditions, which provides a straightforward and practical
access to allylic amino acid derivatives. Importantly, the
protocol can be easily extended to gram scale. An all-carbon
quaternary allylic amino acid derivative was smoothly obtained
in 81% yield and >99.5% ee after a single recrystallization which
would exhibit great potential and be of significance in the
synthesis of biologically active molecules. Further applications
of the useful method to the total synthesis of some interesting
natural products are under investigation in our laboratory and
will be reported in due course.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
Complete experimental details and characterization data for the
compounds. This material is available free of charge via the
(5) (a) Fuji, K. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2037. (b) Corey, E. J.; Guzman-
Perez, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 388. (c) Christoffers, J.;
Mann, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4591. (d) Denissova, I.;
C
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol502535z | Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX