
Journal of Organic Chemistry p. 3814 - 3825 (1995)
Update date:2022-08-02
Topics:
Marquet, Jorge
Cayon, Eduard
Martin, Xavier
Casado, Francisco
Gallardo, Iluminada
et al.
The hypothesis that a specific placement of a positive charge would dramatically alter the behavior of a charged intermediate has been tested.Phenyl ethers substituted by electron-attracting groups do not undergo reductive fragmentation.However, related α-piperidino-ω-(4-substituted-phenoxy)alkanes give alkyl ether photocleavage when the linker between the redox centers is short, or the usual substitution-reduction photochemistry when it is long.Mechanistic experiments suggest that the photofragmentation process operates through space intramolecular electron transfer to the triplet aromatic chromophore and that a coplanar relative orientation of the alkyl ether bond and the phenyl ring is compulsory for the photofragmentation to be observed.Configuration interaction AM1 calculations justify the described facts, indicating that the fragmentation process is only operative when a Coulombic stabilization of a ?* intramolecular electron transfer excited state is produced.Electrochemical studies carried out with the corresponding quaternary salts (intermolecular generation of the phenyl ether radical anion) confirm the conclusions derived from the photochemical experiments.
View MoreContact:+86-(0)21-3770 9035
Address:Room 301, Building 2, Meijiabang Road 1508, Shanghai China
Xiamen Huasing Chemicals Co.Ltd.
Contact:0086-592-6228397
Address:NO.24, Xinglin North 2nd Road,Jimei district
Contact:13813902930 025-52714267
Address:20 Fengji Road, Yuhua Economic Development Zone, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
Contact:+86-871-65217109
Address:132 Lanhei Road, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
A.M FOOD CHEMICAL CO., LIMITED
Contact:86-531-87100375
Address:20Floor,Bblock,1Building,pharma-valley,Jinan,China
Doi:10.1002/anie.201601636
(2016)Doi:10.1002/anie.201403556
(2014)Doi:10.1002/anie.201402620
(2014)Doi:10.1055/s-0033-1341204
(2014)Doi:10.1002/ejoc.201402083
(2014)Doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.08.069
(2014)