Induction of a Ferroelectric SC* Phase
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 40, 1996 9561
3.66 (s, 6H), 3.96 (s, 6H), 7.77-7.80 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 52.7, 56.1, 113.1, 120.8, 124.2, 132.3, 150.0, 159.0, 165.1;
MS (EI) m/z 420 (M+, 5), 374 (97), 342 (31), 313 (100), 298 (72), 283
(32), 267 (11), 255 (21), 241 (8), 227 (16), 212 (12), 199 (11), 184
(14), 156 (13). Anal. Calcd for C18H16N2O10: C, 51.44; H, 3.84; N,
6.66. Found: C, 51.33; H, 4.00; N, 6.72.
(M+, 100), 258 (56), 242 (19), 240 (20), 230 (29), 228 (80), 216 (45),
214 (43), 202 (30), 190 (44), 188 (43), 184 (36), 174 (28), 160 (32),
152 (44), 147 (29), 139 (41), 128 (65), 115 (90). Anal. Calcd for
C14H12N2O6: C, 55.27; H, 3.98; N, 9.21. Found: C, 55.42; H, 4.06;
N, 8.99.
(-)-2,2′-Dimethyl-6,6′-dinitro-4,4′-bis[(4-n-octyloxybenzoyl)oxy]-
biphenyl ((-)-1). Under a N2 atmosphere, 82 mg (0.4 mmol) of solid
DCC was added to a solution of 10 (50 mg, 0.16 mmol), 4-n-
octyloxybenzoic acid (100 mg, 0.4 mmol), and DMAP (50 mg, 0.4
mmol) in 10 mL of dry CH2Cl2. The mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 24 h and then filtered. The filtrate was eluted through
a short silica gel column with CH2Cl2 to give 110 mg (89%) of (()-1
as a white solid. The product was resolved by chiral stationary phase
HPLC using a semiprep (S,S)-Whelk-O 1 column (40:3:1 hexanes/
isopropyl alcohol/CH2Cl2, 3 mL/min) and recrystallized twice from
hexanes to give (-)-1 in optically pure form: mp 130-132 °C; [R]D
(()-4,4′-Dimethoxy-6,6′-dinitrobiphenyl-2,2′-dicarboxylic Acid
(7). A mixture of 6 (2.3 g, 5.5 mmol) and NaOH (1.04 g, 26 mmol)
in 100 mL of 3:2 EtOH/H2O was refluxed with stirring overnight. After
cooling, the EtOH was removed in vacuo, and the aqueousueous phase
was acidified with 2 M aqueous HCl and extracted with EtOAc (3 ×
50 mL). The combined extracts were washed with H2O and brine,
dried (MgSO4), and concentrated to give 2.1 g (98%) of 7 as a yellow
1
solid: mp 252-254 °C; H NMR (200 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 3.93 (s,
6H), 7.69 (d, J ) 2.7 Hz, 2H), 7.83 (d, J ) 2.7 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 56.3, 112.2, 119.8, 122.6, 134.1, 150.1, 158.7,
165.8; MS (EI) m/z 392 (M+, 3), 374 (1), 360 (10), 346 (8), 330 (13),
316 (14), 298 (100), 283 (60), 270 (34), 254 (61), 241 (21), 239 (27),
226 (38), 211 (34), 199 (24), 183 (31), 171 (21), 156 (14), 140 (28).
Anal. Calcd for C16H12O10N2: C, 48.99; H, 3.08; N, 7.14. Found: C,
49.23; H, 3.00; N, 7.11.
1
) -5.01 (c 0.5, CH2Cl2); H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.90 (t, J )
6.7 Hz, 6H), 1.26-1.55 (m, 20 H), 1.76-1.92 (m, 4H), 2.06 (s, 6H),
4.06 (t, J ) 6.5 Hz, 4 H), 7.01 (d, J ) 8.9 Hz, 4H), 7.52 (d, J ) 2.4
Hz, 2H), 7.93 (d, J ) 2.4 Hz, 2H), 8.14 (d, J ) 8.9 Hz, 4H); 13C NMR
(50 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.1, 20.2, 22.6, 26.0, 29.0, 29.2, 29.3, 31.8, 68.4,
114.5, 116.3, 120.5, 128.1, 128.6, 132.5, 139.9, 148.5, 150.6, 163.9,
164.0. Anal. Calcd for C44H52N2O10: C, 68.73; H, 6.82; N, 3.64.
Found: C, 68.49; H, 6.74; N, 3.58.
(()-2,2′-Bis(bromomethyl)-4,4′-dimethoxy-6,6′-dinitrobiphenyl (9).
To a stirred solution of 7 (1.8 g, 4.6 mmol) in 40 mL of dry THF
cooled to 0 °C was added dropwise 20 mL of BH3‚THF (1M solution).
The mixture was then allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred
for 20 h. The reaction was carefully quenched by slow addition of
H2O (100 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL). The organic
extracts were combined and concentrated to an oily residue. The
residue was taken up in EtOAc (50 mL), washed with H2O (2×) and
brine, dried (MgSO4), and concentrated to give 1.5 g of the diol 8 as
a yellow solid: 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.89 (s, 6H), 4.04 (d,
J ) 13.4 Hz, 2H), 4.19 (d, J ) 13.4 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (d, J ) 2.5 Hz,
2H), 7.48 (d, J ) 2.5 Hz, 2H). The crude 8 was taken up in a mixture
of 48% aqueous HBr (30 mL) and glacial AcOH (20 mL) and refluxed
with stirring for 24 h. After cooling, the mixture was poured into H2O
and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL), the combined extracts were
washed with H2O, dried (MgSO4), and concentrated. Purification by
flash chromatography on silica gel (5% isopropanol/hexanes) gave 1.16
g (51%) of 9 as a yellow solid: mp 215-217 °C; 1 H NMR (200 MHz,
acetone-d6) δ 4.20 (d, J ) 12 Hz, 2H), 4.36 (d, J ) 12 Hz, 2H), 7.51
(d, J ) 2.6 Hz, 2H), 7.70 (d, J ) 2.6 Hz, 2H), 9.68 (s, 2 H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 31.2, 111.8, 119.6, 123.1, 139.4, 149.1, 158.0;
MS (EI) 464 (M+4, 4), 462 (M+2, 9), 460 (M+, 4), 418 (4), 416 (8),
414 (4), 383 (5), 381 (5), 337 (24), 335 (26), 271 (62), 256 (99), 239
(100), 226 (49), 212 (47), 197 (48), 181 (43), 167 (33), 152 (75), 149
(93), 139 (57), 127 (38), 115 (75); HRMS (EI) calcd for C14H10N2O6-
Br2: 459.8910. Found: 459.8914.
Ferroelectric Measurements. Texture analyses and transition
temperature measurements for the doped liquid crystal mixtures were
carried out using a Nikon Labophot-2 polarizing microscope fitted with
a Instec HS1-i hot stage. Spontaneous polarization (PS) values were
measured as a function of temperature by the triangular wave method18
(6 V/µm, 60-80 Hz) using a Displaytech APT II polarization testbed
in conjunction with the Instec hot stage. For each data point taken,
the temperature of the sample was allowed to fully equilibrate in order
to rule out any temperature effect during measurement. Polyimide-
coated ITO glass cells (4 µm × 0.25 cm2) supplied by Displaytech
Inc. were used for all the measurements. Good alignment was obtained
by slow cooling of the filled cells from the isotropic phase via the
chiral nematic and SA* phases. Tilt angles (θ) were measured as a
function of temperature between crossed polarizers as half the rotation
between two extinction positions corresponding to opposite polarization
orientations. The sign of PS along the polar axis was assigned from
the relative configuration of the electrical field and the switching
position of the sample according to the established convention.4
Calculations. All calculations were carried out at the semiempirical
AM1 level14 using Spartan version 3.0.1.19 Rotational energy profiles
of the ester linkages in 11 and 12 were obtained by constraining the
torsional angles defined by C-6, C-1, O, C(O) and C-5, C-4, O, C(O),
respectively, and performing a full geometry optimization on the rest
of the molecules. All minima were determined by full geometry
optimization and confirmed as minima by vibrational analysis.
(()-4,4′-Dihydroxy-2,2′-dimethyl-6,6′-dinitrobiphenyl (10).
A
mixture of 9 (2.31 g, 5 mmol) and NaBH3CN (3.2 g, 51 mmol) in 20
mL of dry HMPA was stirred at 55 °C for 20 h under N2. After cooling,
the mixture was poured carefully into 2 M aqueous HCl and extracted
with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL). The combined extracts were washed with
2 M aqueous HCl, dried (MgSO4), and concentrated. The residue was
purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (40% EtOAc/hexanes)
to give 1.16 g (76%) of 10 as a yellow solid: mp 214-215 °C (dec);
1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.96 (s, 6H), 5.28 (br s, 2 H), 7.06 (d,
J ) 2.5 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (d, J ) 2.5 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (50 MHz, DMSO-
d6) δ 19.5, 108.2, 120.4, 121.9, 140.3, 149.2, 157.2; MS (EI) m/z 304
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to the Natural Sciences
and Engineering Research Council of Canada and to Queen’s
University for financial support of this work. We thank Prof.
H. Stegemeyer for a generous gift of NCB76 and Dr. Chris
Welch of Regis Technologies for his assistance in selecting a
suitable HPLC chiral stationary phase to resolve (()-1.
JA9617505