Convenient synthesis of monoprotected 1,2-diols

Article abstract of DOI:10.1080/00397919508011475

Reaction of the protected glycidol derivatives (1A-C) with a wide variety of Grignard reagents (2a-h) in the presence of catalytic amount of CuCN provided the corresponding monoprotected diol derivatives (3) in a highly regioselective manner.

Full text of DOI:10.1080/00397919508011475

This article was downloaded by: [Computing & Library Services, University
of Huddersfield]
On: 07 January 2015, At: 15:50
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954
Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,
UK
Synthetic Communications: An
International Journal for Rapid
Communication of Synthetic
Organic Chemistry
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsyc20
Convenient Synthesis of
Monoprotected 1,2-Diols
László Poppe a , Katalin Recseg b & Lajos Novák c
a Central Research Institute for Chemistry,
Hungarian Academy of Sciences , H-1526, Budapest,
P.O. Box 17, Hungary
b Cereol Research & Development Centre , H-1095,
Budapest, Kvassay J. út 1, Hungary
c Institute for Organic Chemistry, Technical
University of Budapest , H-1111, Budapest, Gellért
tér 4, Hungary
Published online: 23 Sep 2006.
To cite this article: László Poppe , Katalin Recseg & Lajos Novák (1995) Convenient
Synthesis of Monoprotected 1,2-Diols, Synthetic Communications: An International
Journal for Rapid Communication of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 25:24, 3993-4000,
DOI: 10.1080/00397919508011475
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00397919508011475
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,

or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views
expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with
primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any
losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,
and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the
Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions