2344 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 35, No. 8, 1996
Hirsch et al.
Our work19 on the coordination chemistry of “isonitroso-
acetylacetone” ()3-(hydroxyimino)pentane-2,4-dione) led us to
the substituted â-diketone 3-(N-acetylamido)pentane-2,4-dione
) Hamac,20 the copper complex of which was prepared by
pKa of Hamac. The pKa of the ligand in water (I ) 0.5 M, NaClO4)
was determined by potentiometric and spectrophotometric titration with
NaOH at 25 °C. The potentiometric method26 led to pKa ) 7.08 and
the spectrophotometric titration,27 based on λmax(Hamac) ) 278 nm (ꢀ
) 6700 M-1 cm-1) and λmax(amac-) ) 296 nm (ꢀ ) 15 400 M-1 cm-1),
led to pKa ) 6.93. The mean of these two independent determinations
is thus pKa ) 7.01 ( 0.07.
Stability Constants. Equilibrium constant K1 for mono complex
formation according to (3a) was determined by spectrophotometric
K1
\
M
2+ + amac- y
z M(amac)+
(3a)
Fackler and Cotton.21 This ligand is a remarkable â-diketone
in that it is very soluble in water, much more strongly enolized
than any of the â-diketones studied so far, and rather acidic.
We decided to study the kinetics of mono complex formation
according to (3) in aqueous solution for M ) Co, Ni, and Cu
titration of solutions of Hamac and the metal perchlorate (M ) Co,
Ni, Cu) and NaOH at I ) 0.5 M (NaClO4) and 298 K. Complex
formation was monitored in the UV range as well as in the d-d range,
as based on the following absorption data [λmax, nm (ꢀmax, M-1 cm-1)]:
Hamac, 278 (6700); amac-, 296 (15 400); Co(amac)+, 298 (9400) and
508 (14); Ni(amac)+, 302 (12 350) and 648 (3.4); Cu(amac)+, 302
(11 850) and 724 (32); Cu(amac)2, 298 (22 600) and 648 (44).
Computer fitting of the data28 led to the following stability constants.
M
2+ + Hamac h M(amac)+ + H+
(3)
and thus contribute to the understanding of the mechanism of
the enol-based and enolate-based reactions 2b and 2c.
M
K1, M-1 (UV)
K1, M-1 (d-d)
K1, M-1 (mean)
Co
Ni
Cu
2.44 × 104
7.02 × 104
1.70 × 107
1.93 × 104
6.57 × 104
1.17 × 107
(2.18 + 0.25) × 104
(6.79 + 0.22) × 104
(1.43 ( 0.27) × 107
Experimental Section
Chemicals. The various metal perchlorates and buffers (HMOPS,20
HMES,20 HLUS20,22) were reagent grade. The solvent water was
purified by double distillation of deionized water in a quartz apparatus.
The ligand Hamac (mp 99-100 °C) was prepared from Hacac20 in a
two-step procedure as described.21,23
Cu(amac)2 and Cu(amac)2‚toluene. A solution of 0.65 g of Cu-
(AcO)2‚H2O (3.25 mmol) in 25 mL of warm ethanol was slowly added
to a solution of 1.02 g of Hamac (6.5 mmol) in 25 mL of warm ethanol.
After 10 min of stirring at 60 °C, the hot green solution was filtered.
Cooling of the filtrate led to a green precipitate, which was recrystallized
from ethanol, washed with cyclohexane, and dried in vacuo over silica
gel at 60 °C to yield crystalline Cu(amac)2 (yield 40%; dec pt >150
°C). Cu(amac)2‚toluene was prepared analogously, with a 1:1 mixture
of ethanol/toluene instead of ethanol serving as solvent. Cooling of
the reaction mixture led to green needles of Cu(amac)2‚toluene (yield
40%; dec pt >180 °C).
The results of elemental analysis (C,H,N) of Hamac and the two
copper complexes were in good agreement with calculated data. The
magnetic moments of Cu(amac)2 and Cu(amac)2‚toluene at 20 °C were
found to be 1.91 and 1.93 µB, respectively. The solubility of Hamac
(2.45 M) and Cu(amac)2 (0.54 M) in water at 25 °C was determined
spectrophotometrically.
Instrumentation. Magnetic susceptibility: magnetic susceptibility
balance (Johnson-Matthey, type MSB-MKI). UV/vis spectra: diode
array spectrophotometer (Hewlett-Packard, type 8451). pH: pH meter
(Metrohm, type 654) in combination with a glass electrode (Ingold,
type 405-88-S7), calibrated at I ) 0.5 M (NaClO4) to yield the
relationship -log[H+] ) pH - 0.11. Potentiometric titration: apparatus
(Metrohm) consisting of potentiograph, automatic titrator, and Ag/AgCl
reference glass electrode. Kinetic measurements: modified24 stopped-
flow spectrophotometer (Durrum, D 110) and rapid-scan stopped-flow
spectrophotometer.25
Titration of the system Cu2+/Hamac and NaOH up to pH 7 led to
K2 ) (5.32 ( 3.2) × 105 M-1 for the formation of the bis complex
Cu(amac)2. In the case of cobalt and nickel, bis complex formation
was not detectable.
Rate of Enolization/Ketonization and the Ratio [enol]/[ketone].
The rate constant ke for enolization was determined by the bromination
method described elsewhere.3 The bromination of the enol is too fast
to be monitored by the stopped-flow technique at ambient temperature.
The stopped-flow spectrophotometric investigation of the reaction of
Hamac with Br2 at 452 nm (ꢀmax(Br2) ) 103 M-1 cm-1 3) led therefore
to a sharp initial drop in absorbance, ∆A ()Ainit - A0), followed by a
first-order decay of A from A0 to A∞. This first-order reaction, which
corresponds to the enolization of the keto tautomer initially present,
was studied at [Hamac]0 ) [Br2]0 ) 2.5 × 10-3 M in the pH range
0.80-1.68 (I ) 0.5 M, NaClO4). The absorbance/time data were
computer-fitted to eq 4, to obtain the parameters ke, A0, and A∞ (Table
A ) (A0 - A∞) exp(-ket) + A∞
(4)
1). Rate constant ke is pH-independent and averages to ke ) 0.0172 (
0.0004 s-1 at 25 °C. The ratio [enol]/[ketone], following from the ratio
of amplitudes (see Table 1), averages to 2.4 ( 0.1.
The rate constant of ketonization, kk, was also determined by stopped-
flow spectrophotometry. A solution of Hamac at pH 8.5, containing
exclusively the enolate, was reacted with dilute HClO4 to produce
(25) Drexler, C.; Elias, H.; Fecher, B.; Wannowius, K. J. Fresenius J. Anal.
Chem. 1991, 340, 605.
(26) Stepwise titration with NaOH changes the pH, from which the degree
of protonation, n ) [Hamac]/[Hamac]0, was calculated. Computer-
fitting of the n/[H+] data22 to n ) ([H+]/Ka)/(1 + [H+]/Ka) led to Ka.
(27) The species Hamac and amac- differ in their UV absorption. Stepwise
titration with NaOH led to A/[H+] data (A ) absorbance), which were
computer-fitted to A ) [A0(Hamac) + A0(amac-)Ka/[H+]]/(1 + Ka/
[H+]). The symbols A0(Hamac) and A0(amac-) stand for the absor-
bance of the species Hamac and amac- at [Hamac]0.
(19) Elias, H.; Wiegand, D.; Wannowius, K. J. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1992,
197, 21.
(20) Abbreviations: Hamac ) 3-(N-acetylamido)pentane-2,4-dione; HMOPS
) 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid; HMES ) 2-(N-morpholino)-
ethanesulfonic acid; HLUS ) 2,6-dimethylpyridine-3-sulfonic acid;
Hacac ) acetylacetone ) pentane-2,4-dione; Htfpd ) 1,1,1-trifluo-
ropentane-2,4-dione; Hhptd ) heptane-3,5-dione; Htftbd ) 4,4,4-
trifluoro-1-(2-thienyl)butane-1,3-dione.
(21) Fackler, J. P., Jr.; Cotton, F. A. Inorg. Chem. 1963, 2, 102.
(22) Bips, U.; Elias, H.; Hauro¨der, M.; Kleinhans, G.; Pfeifer, S.;
Wannowius, K. J. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 3862.
(23) Wolff, L.; Bock, P.; Lorentz, G.; Trappe, P. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1902,
325, 139.
(24) Elias, H.; Fro¨hn, U.; von Irmer, A.; Wannowius, K. J. Inorg. Chem.
1980, 19, 869.
(28) The absorbance/[H+] data were fitted to eq I (monitoring in the UV
range) or eq II
A ) (A0HL + A0MLK1[M2+]0Ka/[H+])/(1 + K1[M2+]0Ka/[H+]) (I)
A ) (A0M + A0MLK1[HL]0Ka/[H+])/(1 + K1[HL]0Ka/[H+]) (II)
(monitoring in the d-d range) with A0HL, A0ML, and A0 being the
M
absorbance of the species HL, ML, and M at concentrations [M2+
(eq I) and [HL]0 (eq II), respectively.
]
0