is still a matter of research, as attested by the many
enzymatic3 or synthesis procedures4 recently described.
The main drawbacks to enzymatic reactions are often
related to the high cost of enzymes, specific equipment,3f
and difficult isolation of the final desired compound from
excess DHAP precursors such as glycerol.3e Moreover,
substrate inhibition phenomena often limit the final
DHAP concentration to 100 mM.3f In contrast, chemical
syntheses yield stable precursors (Figure 1) that can be
stored in large quantities and converted into DHAP just
before use in enzymatic aldol reactions.
Improved Straightforward Chemical
Synthesis of Dihydroxyacetone Phosphate
through Enzymatic Desymmetrization of
2,2-Dimethoxypropane-1,3-diol
Franck Charmantray, Lahssen El Blidi,
Thierry Gefflaut, Laurence Hecquet, Jean Bolte,* and
Marielle Lemaire*
Laboratoire SEESIB, UMR 6504 CNRS,
Universite´ Blaise Pascal, 24 avenue des Landais,
63177 Aubie`re Cedex, France
Compound 1 is the most widely used and is readily
prepared from dihydroxyacetone dimer (DHA).4e Com-
pound 2 has been obtained from commercially available
1,3-dibromoacetone in a few steps.4c A three-step prepa-
ration of a cyclic phosphate 3 as an alternative DHAP
precursor has recently been described.4b However, from
1, 2, and 3, DHAP is formed in moderate yield with
several impurities, mainly inorganic phosphate. More-
over, these syntheses are not highly reproducible. The
dimethyl acetal precursor 4 used by Ballou et al.5 and
Valentin et al.4d appears the most suited for achieving
the last steps in high yield. However, its preparation from
dibromoacetone4d or 3-chloropropane-1,2-diol5 involves too
many steps for a large-scale application.
The present study describes a fundamental improve-
ment in DHAP chemical synthesis via 4 in terms of time,
yield, purity and reproducibility. The route for preparing
DHAP is depicted in Scheme 1.
We report a three-step synthesis of compound 4 from
DHA with only one short purification step and its one-
pot conversion into DHAP on large scale.
Results and Discussion. Dihydroxyacetone dimethyl
acetal 6 was prepared according to a slight modification
of the previously described method.4b,6 To use the crude
diol 6 in the next step, neutralization and removal of
TsOH was achieved with the basic Amberlyst A26 resin
(OH- form) instead of Na2CO3. In the second step,
monofunctionalization of the diol was performed via a
lipase-catalyzed transesterification with use of vinyl
acetate as the acyl donor.7 Of the lipases tested (Amano
AK: Pseudomonas fluorescens lipase; Amano PS: Burk-
holderia cepacia lipase; CAL: Candida antartica lipase;
CRL: Candida rugosa lipase; CCL: Candida cylindracea
lipase; PPL: porcine pancreas lipase; and WGL: wheat
germ lipase), Amano AK gave the best results: most of
the diol 6 was promptly converted into monoacetate 7
before the slow appearance of the undesired diacetate.
Received July 28, 2004
Abstract: Dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) was syn-
thesized in high purity and yield in four steps starting from
dihydroxyacetone dimer (DHA) (47% overall yield). DHA was
converted into 2,2-dimethoxypropane-1,3-diol, which was
desymmetrized by acetylation with lipase AK. The alcohol
function was phosphorylated to give dibenzyl phosphate
ester 4. From 4, two routes were investigated for large-scale
synthesis of DHAP. First, acetate hydrolysis was performed
prior to hydrogenolysis of the phosphate protective groups.
The acetal hydrolysis was finally catalyzed by the phosphate
group itself. Second, acetate and acetal hydrolysis were
performed in one single step after hydrogenolysis.
Four dihydroxyacetone phosphate-dependent aldolases
are known to catalyze the condensation of a variety of
aldehydes with dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) to
give monosaccharides and other chiral compounds of
related structures.1 These DHAP aldolases have shown
complementary diastereoselectivity for the two stereo-
centers connected by the newly formed C-C bond, and
three of them are useful catalysts for applications in
organic synthesis. Of these, the glycolytic enzyme fructose-
1,6-bisphosphate aldolase has been the most widely used
over the last 20 years.2 DHAP is the essential donor
substrate, and although commercially available it is too
expensive for large-scale synthesis. Large-scale DHAP
production requires efficient and reliable syntheses. This
* Address correspondence to this author. Phone: 33-4-73-40-75-84.
Fax: 33-4-73-40-77-17.
(1) (a) Wong, C.-H. In Enzyme catalysis in organic synthesis, 2nd
ed.; Drauz, K., Waldmann, H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany,
2002; Vol. 2, pp 931-974. (b) Phung, A. N.; Zannetti, M. T.; Whited,
G.; Fessner, W. D. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4821-4824. (c)
Fessner, W.-D.; Helaine, V. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001, 12, 574-
586. (d) Fessner, W.-D. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 85-97. (e)
Silvestri, M. G.; Desantis, G.; Mitchell, M.; Wong, C.-H. Top. Stere-
ochem. 2003, 23, 267-342. (f) Franke, D.; Machajewski, T.; Hsu, C.-
C.; Wong, C.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6828-6831. (g) Espelt, L.;
Parella, T.; Bujons, J.; Solans, C.; Joglar, J.; Delgado, A.; Clapes P.
Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 4887-4899.
(4) (a) Ouwerkerk, N.; Steenweg, M.; de Ruijter, M.; Brouwer, J.;
van Boom, J. H.; Lugtenburg, J.; Raap, J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
1480-1489. (b) Ferroni, E. L.; DiTella, V.; Ghanayem, N.; Jeske, R.;
Jodlowski, C.; O’Connell, M.; Styrski, J.; Svodoba, R.; Venkataraman,
A.; Winkler, B. M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4943-4945. (c) Gefflaut,
T.; Lemaire, M.; Valentin M.-L.; Bolte, J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
5920-5922. (d) Valentin, M.-L.; Bolte, J. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1995,
132, 1167-1171. (e) Jung, S.-H.; Jeong, J.-H.; Miller, P.; Wong, C.-H.
J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 7182-7184.
(2) (a) Schoevaart, R.; Van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R. A. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 705-711. (b) Schoevaart, R.; van Rantwijk,
F.; Sheldon, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4559-4562. (c) Guanti, G.;
Banfi, L.; Zannetti, M. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3181-3185.
(3) (a) Wong, C.-H.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 3199-
3205. (b) Crans, D. C.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107,
7019-7027. (c) Simon, E. S.; Grabowski, S.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8920-8921. (d) Fessner, W. D.; Sinerius, G.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 209-212. (e) Schoevaart, R.;
van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6940-6943.
(f) Hettwer, J.; Oldenburg H.; Flaschel, E. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym.
2002, 215-222.
(5) Ballou, C. E.; Fischer, H. O. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78,
1659-1661.
(6) Cesarotti, E.; Antognazza, P.; Pallavicini, M.; Villa, L. Helv.
Chim. Acta 1993, 76, 2344.
(7) Burchardt, A.; Takahashi, T.; Takeuchi, Y.; Haufe, G. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 66, 2078-2084.
10.1021/jo048697k CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/12/2004
9310
J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 9310-9312