14–17 showed IC50 values of 5.0, 2.4, 1.4 and 0.6 nmol,
respectively where monomeric T-antigen 8 needed 2.3 mmol.
The inhibitory abilities of these conjugates were thus 460, 960,
1700 and 3800 times higher than that of monomer 8.
Interestingly, when expressed on a per saccharide basis, all
dendrimers were equivalent to one another (115 fold better than
8), thus supporting previous observations that low density
glycoPAMAMs are efficient inhibitors.5
In conclusion, geometrically well designed starburst T-
antigen-glycoPAMAMs were efficiently synthesized with va-
lencies between 4 to 32 using efficient peptide coupling
strategy. A series of bioassays with mouse MAb IgG demon-
strated that these conjugates strongly bound to the antibody. All
conjugates were antigenetically active as previously demon-
strated with analogous structures.5–7 Moreover, some carci-
noma cells have been reported to express T-antigen binding
sites,14 it is therefore possible that the compounds described
herein may also find applications in specific cancer cell
targeting.
Scheme 2 (a) 1.1 eq 9 per amine, TBTU, DIPEA, DMSO, 25 °C, (b) gel
permeation chromatography (P-2, or P-4, water) or dialysis (2000 molecular
weight cut-off) 73–99%. DIPEA
= diisopropylethylamine, DMSO =
dimethylsulfoxide.
Notes and references
† Physical data for representative compounds, NMR assignments are based
on COSY and HMQC.
6: mp 109.7–111.0 °C; Rf = 0.59 (benzene–ethyl acetate, 1+2); [a]D
=
+116.0° (c = 1.00, CHCl3); (+) FAB-MS (glycerol) (m/z): 928.3 (M + 1);
dH (500 MHz, CDCl3): 5.16 (m, Jcis = 8.0 Hz, 2 H, CH, H1A), 5.10 (d, J12
= 3.4 Hz, 1 H, H1); dC (500 MHz, CDCl3): 102.0 (C1A), 100.9 (CH), 97.4
(C1); Anal. Calcd. for C52H49O15N (927.49): C, 67.20; H, 5.31; N, 1.53.
Found: C, 66.84; H, 5.27; N, 1.48%. 9: mp 90.0–92.5 °C; [a]D = +76.0° (c
Fig. 1 ELISA of T-antigen-glycoPAMAMs, 14(5), 15 (3), 16 (/) and 17
(:) with mouse monoclonal IgG antibody, goat anti-mouse IgG-horse-
radish peroxidase conjugate and ABTS-H2O2 as enzyme substrate. O.D.
(410 nm) = optical density, ABTS = 2,2A-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazo-
line-6-sulfonic acid). C: Relative concentration.
=
1, H2O); Rf = 0.33 (CHCl3–MeOH–H2O, 10+9+1); (+) FAB-MS
(glycerol): 530.3 (M + 1); dH (ppm, D2O): 4.96 (d, J12 = 3.7 Hz, 1 H, H1),
4.54 (d, J1A2A = 7.7 Hz, 1 H, H1A); dH (ppm, D2O): 104.2 (C1A), 96.7 (C1).
17: dH (500 MHz, D2O): 4.96 (d, J12 = 3.7 Hz, 32 H, H1), 4.56 (d, J1A2A
=
7.7 Hz, 32 H, H1A); dC (D2O): 104.2 (C1A), 96.8 (C1). Anal. Calcd. for
C942H1664O444N154S32(23,278.7): C, 48.60; H, 7.20; N, 9.27. Found: C,
48.85; H, 7.21; N, 8.79%.
The binding properties of glycoPAMAMs to mouse mono-
clonal IgG antibody (MAb)11 were initially evaluated by
enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Fig. 1). Glyco-
PAMAMs were used as coating antigens to determine their
ability to capture antibodies on the surface of the microtiter
plates. Goat anti-mouse MAb IgG-horseradish peroxidase
(HRP) conjugate was used for quantitative detection. The
ability of the mouse MAb to recognise all glycodendrimers was
clearly demonstrated (Fig. 1). Compound 17, having 32 T-
antigen residues, was shown to be the best ligand. To obtain an
optical density value of 0.6, 90 mmol of coating glycoden-
drimers was needed. This value represents 2- to 4-fold increased
binding potentials over those of 15 (16-mer) and 16 (8-mer)
(330 and 150 mmol, respectively) which where > 25-fold more
potent than tetramer 14 ( > 2 mmol).
The efficiency of these glycoPAMAMs for protein-binding
interactions were further substantiated by competitive double
sandwich inhibition where conjugates 14–17 were employed as
inhibitors. T-antigen-co-polyacrylamide (T-antigen–acryla-
mide, 1+10)13 was used as a coating antigen. To this end, the T-
antigen polymer (1mg well21, 0.85 nmol of T-antigen in PBS)
was deposited in the microtiter plates. In separated plates
(Nunclon, Delta), mouse-MAb IgG (50 mL well21, 0.25 mmol in
PBS-tween) and glycoPAMAM inhibitors (50 mL well21 in
PBS-tween with varying concentrations from 275 to 1.07 nmol
well21) were preincubated. After blocking the microtiter plates
with bovine serum albumin (BSA), the wells were filled with
the mixture of antibody–glycoPAMAM inhibitors (100
mL well21) and the mixtures were then incubated for 1 h at
37 °C. For the quantitative detection of antibodies, goat anti-
mouse MAb-HRP was then added, as above. Based on bulk
conjugates, the glycoPAMAMs with highest carbohydrate
density (17) exhibited the strongest inhibitions. Conjugates
‡ TBTU
=
O-benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,NA,NA-tetramethyluronium tetra-
fluoroborate.
1 M. Fischer and F. Vögtle, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 884.
2 A. U. Bielinska, C. Chen, J. Johnson and J. R. Baker, Jr., Bioconjugate
Chem., 1999, 10, 843.
3 J. D. Reuter, A. Myc, M. M. Hayes, Z. Gan, R. Roy, D. Qin, R. Yin, L. T.
Piehler, R. Esfand, D. A. Tomalia and J. R. Baker, Jr., Bioconjugate
Chem., 1999, 10, 271.
4 (a) R. Duncan and N. Malik, Proc. Int. Symp. Controlled Release
Bioact. Mater., 1996, 23, 105; (b) J. C. Roberts, M. K. Bhalgat and
R. T. Zera, J. Biomed Mater. Res., 1996, 30, 53.
5 (a) R. Roy, Polymer News, 1996, 21, 226; (b) R. Roy, Carbohydr. Eur.,
1999, 27, 34.
6 T. Toyokuni and A. K. Singhal, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1995, 231.
7 S. André, P. J. C. Ortega, M. A. Perez, R. Roy and H. J. Gabius,
Glycobiology, 1999, 9, 1253.
8 (a) R. Roy, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1996, 6, 692; (b) L. L. Kiessling
and N. L. Pohl, Chem. Biol., 1996, 3, 71; (c) M. Mammen, S. K. Choi
and G. M. Whitesides, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 2754.
9 P. O. Livingston, R. Koganty, B. M. Longenecker, K. O. Lloyd and M.
Calves, Vaccine Res., 1992, 1, 99; Y. Chen, R. K. Jain, E. V.
Chandrasekaran and K. L. Matta, Glycoconjuate J., 1995, 12, 55;
P. Y. S. Hung, M. Madej, R. R. Koganty and B. M. Longenecker,
Cancer Res., 1990, 50, 4308.
10 R. S. Donovan, A. Datti, M. G. Baek, Q. Q. Wu, I. Sas, B. Korczak, E. G.
Berger, R. Roy and J. W. Dennis, Glycoconjugate J., 1999, 16, 607.
11 K. Rittenhouse-Diakun, Z. Xia, D. Pickhardt, S. Morey, M. G. Baek and
R. Roy, Hybridoma, 1998, 17, 165.
12 L.-X. Wang and Y. C. Lee, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1996,
581.
13 M.-G. Baek and R. Roy, Biomacromolecules, 2000, 1, 768.
14 H.-J. Gabius, C. Schroter, S. Gabius, U. Brinck and L.-F. Tietze,
J. Histochem. Cytochem., 1990, 38, 1625.
258
Chem. Commun., 2001, 257–258