Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.8 (2004)
961
R'
3
4
C. S. Jang, F. Y. Fu, C. Y. Wang, K. C. Huang, G. Lu, and
T. C. Thou, Science, 103, 59 (1946).
O
N
NH2
NaHSO4.SiO2
or Amberlyst-15
5 - 15 min
COOH
NH2
N
a) T. Onaka, Tetrahedron Lett., 1971, 4387. b) T. Kametani,
C. V. Loc, T. Higa, M. Koizumi, M. Ihara, and K. Fukumoto,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99, 2306 (1977). c) M. Mori, H.
Kobayashi, M. Kimura, and Y. Ban, Heterocycles, 23,
2803 (1985). d) F. Sauter, J. Frohlic, K. Blasl, and K.
Gewald, Heterocycles, 40, 851 (1985). e) V. J. Majo and
P. T. Perumal, Tetrahedron Lett., 37, 5015 (1996). f) M.
Prasad, L. Chen, O. Repic, and T. J. Blacklock, Synth.
Commun., 28, 2125 (1998). g) D. J. Connolly and P. J. Guiry,
Synlett, 2001, 1707. h) L. Wang, J. Xia, F. Qin, C. Qian and
J. Sun, Synthesis, 2003, 1241.
HC(OR)3
+
+
R'
1
3
4
2
(81 - 98%)
.
The catalysts, NaHSO4 SiO2 and Amberlyst-15 work under
heterogeneous conditions. In recent years heterogeneous cata-
lysts have attracted more attention as they catalyze the chemical
processes under eco-friendly manner and with satisfactory yields
and low cost. Both the presently used catalysts can conveniently
be handled and removed from the reaction mixture after comple-
6
.
tion of the reaction. NaHSO4 SiO2 can be prepared easily from
the readily available ingredients, NaHSO4 and silica gel. The ac-
tivity and efficiency of both the catalysts for the present conver-
sion are comparable. However, Amberlyst-15 can be recovered,
activated and recycled.
5
General experimental procedure: To a mixture of anthranilic
acid (1 mmol), an orthoester (1.2 mmol), and an amine
.
(1.2 mmol) NaHSO4 SiO2 (100 mg, the ratio of NaHSO4
and SiO2 was 2:5) or Amberlyst-15 (50 mg) was added.
The mixture was stirred at room temperature. The reaction
was monitored by TLC. After completion CH2Cl2 (10 mL)
was added to the reaction mixture and filtered. The filtrate
was washed with aq HCl (5%) (3 ꢂ 5 mL) and subsequently
with H2O (3 ꢂ 10 mL). The organic layer was dried and the
solvent was evaporated to get 4(3H)-quinazolinone. When
the reaction was carried out with a nitroaniline or with 2,5-
dimethoxyaniline the reaction mixture was refluxed at
60 ꢁC. Amberlyst-15 was recovered from the residue of fil-
tration of the reaction mixture by washing throughly with
CH2Cl2, activated and recycled. The efficiency of the recov-
ered Amberlyst-15 was verified with the reaction of anthra-
nilic acid, trimethyl orthoformate and aniline (Entry a). Us-
ing the fresh catalyst the yield of the product, 3-phenyl-
4(3H)-quinazolinone (4a) was 94% while with the recovered
catalyst in the three subsequent recyclization the yields were
92, 89, and 88%. The spectral properties of some representa-
tive 4(3H)-quinazolinones are given below.: 3-Phenyl-
In conclusion, we have developed a simple and efficient
three-component coupling reaction of anthranilic acid, orthoest-
.
ers, and amines using NaHSO4 SiO2 or Amberlyst-15 for the
preparation of 4(3H)-quinazolinones in single step. The mild
and solvent free heterogeneous reaction conditions, short reac-
tion times (5–15 min), simple experimental procedure, excellent
yields (81–98%) and reusability of one of the catalysts (Amber-
lyst-15) are of great advantages of the present protocol. The
process is associated with the combined benefits derived from
multicomponent reaction and heterogeneous catalyst. We feel
that the developed procedure will find important practical appli-
cations for the synthesis of 4(3H)-quinazolinones.
The authors thank CSIR, New Delhi for financial assistance.
References and Notes
1
a) J. F. Wolfe, T. L. Rathman, M. C. Sleevi, J. A. Campbell,
and T. D. Greenwood, J. Med. Chem., 33, 161 (1990). b) K.
Tereshima, H. Shimamura, A. Kawase, Y. Tanaka, T.
Tanimura, T. Kamisaki, Y. Ishizuka, and M. Sato, Chem.
Pharm. Bull., 43, 2021 (1995). c) Y. Kurogi, Y. Inoue, K.
Tsutsumi, S. Nakamura, K. Nagao, H. Yohsitsugu, and Y.
Tsuda, J. Med. Chem., 39, 1443 (1996). d) N. J. Liverton,
D. J. Armstong, D. A. Claremon, D. C. Remy, J. J. Baldwin,
R. J. Lynch, G. Zhang, and R. Gould, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 8, 483 (1998). e) D. Gueyrard, V. Gurnel, O. Leoni,
S. Palmieri, and P. Rollin, Heterocycles, 52, 827 (2000).
a) J. B. Koepfly, J. F. Mead, and J. A. Brockman, Jr., J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 69, 1837 (1947). b) F. Ablondi, S. Gordon,
J. Morton, II, and J. H. Williams, J. Org. Chem., 17, 14
(1952). c) S. Kobayashi, M. Ueno, R. Suzuki, and H. Ishitani,
Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 2175 (1999).
1
4(3H)-quinazolinone (4a), H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d
8.68 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 8.31 (1H, s), 7.52 (2H, d,
J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 7.38–7.22 (5H, m), 7.16 (1H, m); EIMS: m=z
(%) 222 (Mþ, 5), 221 (Mþ ꢃ 1, 4) 121 (92), 93 (100).
3-(3-Chlorophenyl)-4(3H)-quinazolinone (4e), 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 200 MHz): d 8.32 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 8.12 (1H,
s), 7.89–7.61 (2H, m), 7.61–7.53 (4H, m), 7.40 (1H, m);
EIMS: m=z (%) 257 (Mþ þ 1, 22), 256 (Mþ, 23), 221 (12),
149 (78), 111 (22). 3-(2,6-Dimethyl phenyl)-4(3H)-quina-
1
2
zolinone (4q), H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz): d 8.38 (1H, d,
J ¼ 8:0 Hz), 7.88–7.72 (2H, m), 7.55 (1H, t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz),
7.36–7.20 (3H, m), 7.02 (1H, m), 2.18 (6H, s); EIMS: m=z
(%) 250 (Mþ, 62), 233 (91), 149 (46), 125 (12), 103 (38).
G. W. Breton, J. Org. Chem., 62, 8952 (1997).
6
Published on the web (Advance View) June 28, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.960