1624 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996, Vol. 39, No. 8
Driscoll et al.
column chromatography, in the same manner as for compound
4, to give 0.180 g (93%) of 6 as a foam: 1H NMR (D2O) δ 1.10
(t, 3 H, CH2CH3), 2.15 (m, 1 H, H-3′a), 2.55 (m, 1 H, H-3′b),
3.30 (br q, 2 H, CH2CH3), 3.65 (m, 2 H, H-5′a,b), 4.25 (m, 1 H,
(relative intensity) 360 (MH+, 100), 242 (b + 2 H, 24), 91
(PhCH2+, 44). Anal. (C17H18FN5O3‚1.5H2O) C, H, N.
6-H yd r a zin o-9-(2,3-d id eoxy-2-flu or o-â-D-th r eo-p en t o-
fu r a n osyl)-9H-p u r in e, Hyd r och lor id e (10). Compound 3b
(0.128 g, 0.47 mmol) was treated with anhydrous hydrazine
(2 mL), and the resulting solution was stirred at room
temperature for 30 min. After the addition of 2-propanol (5
mL), the reaction mixture was reduced to dryness under
vacuum. The residue was purified by flash column chroma-
tography on silica gel using a 0-20% gradient of MeOH in
CH2Cl2 as eluant to give 0.113 g (79%) of 10 as a hygroscopic
hydrochloride salt: 1H NMR (MeOH-d4) δ 2.40 (m, 1 H, H-3′a),
2.60 (m, 1 H, H-3′b), 3.75 (m, 2H, H-5′a,b), 4.30 (m, 1 H, H-4′),
5.37 (dm, J 2′,F ) 54.2 Hz, 1 H, H-2′), 6.35 (dd, J 1′,F ) 16.4, J 1′,2′
) 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1′), 8.32 (s, 1 H, H-2), 8.36 (d, J 8,F ) 2.2 Hz,
1 H, H-8); FAB MS m/ z (relative intensity) 269 (MH+, 100),
151 (b + 2 H, 62). Anal. (C10H13FN6O2‚HCl‚1.75H2O) C, H,
N.
6-Nitr o-9-[5-O-(ter t-bu tyld im eth ylsilyl)-2,3-d id eoxy-2-
flu or o-â-D-th r eo-p en tofu r a n osyl]-9H-p u r in e (13). This
compound was obtained as a minor byproduct during the
diazotization/radical chlorination reaction of 6-amino-9-[5-O-
(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-2,3-dideoxy-2-fluoro-â-D-threo-pento-
furanosyl]-9H-purine (11) with tert-butyl nitrite and CCl4.5a
A suspension of 11 (1.90 g, 5.17 mmol) in freshly distilled tert-
butyl nitrite (24 mL, 210.7 mmol) was heated to 80 °C and
treated with freshly distilled CCl4 (250 mL) while being
maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere. Stirring and heat-
ing (80 °C) continued under direct incandescent illumination
(200 W bulb) for 3 h. The reaction mixure was then cooled,
concentrated under reduced pressure, and purified by flash
column chromatography using silica gel and hexane:EtOAc
(10:0 to 7:3) to give 0.79 g (39%) of 6-chloro-9-[5-O-(tert-
butyldimethylsilyl)-2,3-dideoxy-2-fluoro-â-D-threo-pentofurano-
syl]-9H-purine (12).5a This was followed by 13 (0.20 g, 10%),
which was used in the next step without additional purifica-
tion: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.15 (s, 6 H, Me2Si), 0.95 (s, 9 H,
Me3C), 2.45 (m, 1 H, H-3′a), 2.60 (m, 1 H, H-3′b), 3.90 (m, 2
H, H-5′a,b), 4.35 (m, 1 H, H-4′), 5.40 (dm, J 2′,F ) 54.0 Hz, 1 H,
H-2′), 6.50 (dd, J 1′,F ) 15.5, J 1′,2′ ) 3.6 Hz, 1 H, H-1′), 8.75 (d,
J 8,F ) 2.2 Hz, 1 H, H-8), 9.00 (s, 1 H, H-2).
Dep r otection of 6-Nitr o-9-[5-O-(ter t-bu tyld im eth ylsi-
lyl)-2,3-d id eoxy-2-flu or o-â-D-th r eo-p en t ofu r a n osyl]-9H -
p u r in e (13) To Give 14 or 15. A. With Tetr a -n -bu tyla m -
m on iu m F lu or id e. A solution of 13 (0.010 g, 0.025 mmol)
in THF (4 mL) was treated with a 1 M solution of tetra-n-
butylammonium fluoride in THF (TBAF, 0.2 mL) and stirred
at room temperature for 1 h. The solution was directly applied
to a preparative TLC (Analtech; silica gel, 1500 µm) which was
developed with EtOAc as eluant to give 0.0032 g (50%) of
6-fluoro-9-(2,3-dideoxy-2-fluoro-â-D-threo-pentofuranosyl)-9H-
purine (14) as a foam.5a
B. With AcOH. A solution of 13 (0.10 g, 0.251 mmol) in
THF (4 mL) was treated with a 4:1:1 mixture of AcOH:THF:
water (6 mL) and stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The
solution was reduced to dryness under reduced pressure and
the crude product was purified by flash column chromatogra-
phy on silica gel using EtOAc as eluant to give 0.0382 g (54%)
of 6-nitro-9-(2,3-dideoxy-2-fluoro-â-D-threo-pentofuranosyl)-9H-
purine (15) as a solid, mp 148-150 °C. This sample was >96%
pure by HPLC analysis with <4% F-ddI identified as the
impurity: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.55 (m, 1 H, H-3′a,b), 3.95 (m,
2 H, H-5′a,b), 4.45 (m, 1 H, H-4′), 5.45 (dm, J 2′,F ) 54.0 Hz, 1
H, H-2′), 6.52 (dd, J 1′,F ) 15.2, J 1′,2′ ) 3.7 Hz, 1 H, H-1′), 8.85
(d, J 8,F ) 1.6 Hz, 1 H, H-8), 9.05 (s, 1 H, H-2); FAB MS m/ z
(relative intensity) 284 (MH+, 100), 166 (b + 2 H, 62); accurate
mass positive ion FAB MS m/ z 284.1092 (MH+, calcd 284.0795).
Compound 15 could not be purified completely because of facile
hydrolytic conversion to F-ddI. Changing the flash chromato-
graphic eluant from EtOAc to 10% MeOH in CH2Cl2 also
permited the isolation of 0.012 g (19%) of F-ddI which was
identified by comparison with an authentic sample.6
H-4′), 5.22 (dm, J 2′,F ) 53.5 Hz, 1 H, H-2′), 6.03 (dd, J 1′,F
)
18.6, J 1′,2′ ) 3.2 Hz, 1 H, H-1′), 7.85 (s, 1 H, H-2), 8.03 (d, J 8,F
) 2.4 Hz, 1 H, H-8); FAB MS m/ z (relative intensity) 282
(MH+, 100), 164 (b + 2 H, 40). Anal. (C12H16FN5O2‚0.75H2O)
C, H, N.
6-(H yd r oxya m in o)-9-(2,3-d id eoxy-2-flu or o-â-D-th r eo-
p en tofu r a n osyl)-9H-p u r in e, Hyd r och lor id e (7). A solu-
tion of 3b (0.095 g, 0.35 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) was treated
with excess of O-(trimethylsilyl)hydroxylamine (2.5 mL) and
heated at reflux for 20 h. The solution was cooled, quenched
with MeOH (5 mL), and concentrated under reduced pressure.
The crude product was purified by flash column chromatog-
raphy using silica gel and a 0-20% gradient of MeOH in CH2-
Cl2 as eluant to give 0.067 g (63%) of 7 as a foam. An
analytical sample was obtained after purification by reversed
phase C-18 chromatography using a 0-10% gradient of MeOH
in water as eluant. Lyophilization of the product-containing
fractions afforded pure 7 as an amorphous white solid: 1H
NMR (D2O) δ 2.18 (m, 1 H, H-3′a), 2.54 (m, 1 H, H-3′b), 3.68
(m, 2 H, H-5′a,b), 4.30 (m, 1 H, H-4′), 5.30 (dm, J 2′,F ) 53.5 Hz,
1 H, H-2′), 6.15 (dd, J 1′,F ) 18.4, J 1′,2′ ) 3.0 Hz, 1 H, H-1′), 7.88
(s, 1 H, H-2), 8.09 (d, J 8,F ) 1.8 Hz, 1 H, H-8); FAB MS m/ z
(relative intensity) 270 (MH+, 100), 152 (b + 2 H, 33). Anal.
(C10H12FN5O3‚HCl) C, H, N.
6-(Met h oxya m in o)-9-(2,3-d id eoxy-2-flu or o-â-D-th r eo-
p en tofu r a n osyl)-9H-p u r in e (8). A solution of 3b (0.150 g,
0.55 mmol) in dry THF (15 mL) was treated with excess of
O-methylhydroxylamine (8.50 g). O-Methylhydroxylamine
was obtained as a clear liquid by distillation (bp 48-50 °C) of
a KOH-neutralized aqueous solution of O-methylhydroxyl-
amine hydrochloride. The reaction mixture was heated at
reflux for 20 h, cooled, and concentrated under reduced
pressure. The crude product was purified by preparative TLC
(Analtech; silica gel, 2000 µm) using CH2Cl2:MeOH (9:1) as
eluant to give 0.145 g (93%) of 8 as a solid: mp 200-202 °C
dec (EtOH:ether); 1H NMR (Me2SO-d6) δ 2.20 (m, 1 H, H-3′a),
2.55 (m, 1 H, H-3′b), 3.60 (m, 2 H, H-5′a,b), 3.65 and 3.66
(singlets, 3 H, CH3O), 4.15 (m, 1 H, H-4′), 5.01 (m, 1 H, OH),
5.40 (dm, J 2′,F ) 54.3 Hz, 0.8 H, H-2′), 5.45 (dm, J 2′,F ) 54.3
Hz, 0.2 H, H-2′), 6.15 (dd, J 1′,F ) 15.3, J 1′,2′ ) 3.8 Hz, 0.8 H,
H-1′), 6.38 (dd, J 1′,F ) 15.3, J 1′,2′ ) 3.8 Hz, 0.2 H, H-1′), 7.56
(d, J 2,NH ) 3.6 Hz, 0.8 H, H-2), 8.00 (d, J 8,F ) 1.9 Hz, 0.8 H,
H-8), 8.30 (br s, 0.2 H, H-2), 8.36 (br s, 0.2 H, H-8), 11.00 (br
1
s, 0.2 H, NH), 11.30 (br s, 0.8 H, NH); H NMR (Me2SO-d6
+
D2O) δ 2.20 (m, 1 H, H-3′a), 2.55 (m, 1 H, H-3′b), 3.60 (m, 2 H,
H-5′a,b), 4.15 (m, 1 H, H-4′), 5.40 (dm, J 2′,F ) 54.3 Hz, 1 H,
H-2′), 6.15 (dd, J 1′,F ) 15.3, J 1′,2′ ) 3.8 Hz, 1 H, H-1′), 7.75 (br
s, 1 H, H-2), 8.10 (br s, 1 H, H-8); FAB MS m/ z (relative
intensity) 284 (MH+, 100), 166 (b + 2 H, 27). Anal. (C11H14
FN5O3‚0.5H2O) C, H, N.
-
6-[(Ben zyloxy)am in o]-9-(2,3-dideoxy-2-flu or o-â-D-th r eo-
p en tofu r a n osyl)-9H-p u r in e (9). A solution of 3b (0.10 g,
0.36 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was treated with excess of
O-benzylhydroxylamine29 (4 g) and triethylamine (50 µL). The
reaction mixture was heated at reflux for 36 h, cooled, and
concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was
purified by preparative TLC (Analtech; silica gel, 1500 µm)
using CH2Cl2:MeOH (9:1) as eluant to give 0.040 g (30%) of 9
as a foam [some 3b (0.028 g, 28%) was also isolated]: 1H NMR
(Me2SO-d6) δ 2.20 (m, 1 H, H-3′a), 2.50 (m, 1 H, H-3′b), 3.60
(m, 2 H, H-5′a,b), 4.15 (m, 1 H, H-4′), 5.01 (m, 3 H, PhCH2O,
OH), 5.35 (dm, J 2′,F ) 54.3 Hz, 0.8 H, H-2′), 5.45 (dm, J 2′,F
)
54.3 Hz, 0.2 H, H-2′), 6.15 (dd, J 1′,F ) 15.2, J 1′,2′ ) 3.9 Hz, 0.8
H, H-1′), 6.38 (dd, J 1′,F ) 15.2, J 1′,2′ ) 3.9 Hz, 0.2 H, H-1′), 7.20-
7.50 (m, 5 H, Ph), 7.60 (d, J 2,NH ) 3.7 Hz, 0.8 H, H-2), 8.00 (d,
J 8,F ) 2.1 Hz, 0.8 H, H-8), 8.36 (br s, 0.2 H, H-2), 8.40 (br s,
0.2 H, H-8), 11.05 (br s, 0.2 H, NH), 11.30 (d, J 2,NH ) 3.7 Hz,
0.8 H, NH); 1H NMR (Me2SO-d6 + D2O) δ 2.20 (m, 1 H, H-3′a),
2.50 (m, 1 H, H-3′b), 3.60 (m, 2 H, H-5′a,b), 4.15 (m, 1 H, H-4′),
5.00 (s, 2 H, PhCH2), 5.35 (dm, J 2′,F ) 54.3 Hz, 1 H, H-2′), 6.15
(dd, J 1′,F ) 15.2, J 1′,2′ ) 3.8 Hz, 1 H, H-1′), 7.20-7.50 (m, 5 H,
Ph), 7.70 (br s, 1 H, H-2), 8.05 (br s, 1 H, H-8); FAB MS m/ z
Red u ction of 6-Nitr o-9-(2,3-d id eoxy-2-flu or o-â-D-th r eo-
p en tofu r a n osyl)-9H-p u r in e (15) to th e 6-Am in o An a log
2. A suspension of 15 (0.022 g, 0.07 mmol) in EtOH (5 mL)
was treated with ammonium formate (0.020 g, 0.31 mmol) and
10% Pd/C (0.020 g), and the mixture was stirred at room