3586
J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3586-3587
Sch em e 1
Ster eoselective Nu cleop h ilic Ep oxid a tion
of Vin yl Su lfoxid es: A Novel Rou te to
En a n tiop u r e Su lfin yl Oxir a n es†,1
Roberto Ferna´ndez de la Pradilla,*,‡ Sonia Castro,‡
Pilar Manzano,‡ J ulia´n Priego,‡ and Alma Viso§
Instituto de Quı´mica Orga´nica, CSIC, J uan de la Cierva, 3,
28006 Madrid, Spain, and Departamento de Qu´ımica
Orga´nica I, Facultad de Quı´mica, Universidad
Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Received February 27, 1996
Enantiopure sulfinyl oxiranes are versatile synthetic
intermediates2 available by condensation of R-chloroalkyl
p-tolyl sulfoxides with aldehydes or ketones and subse-
quent cyclization. However, this process results in the
formation of two diastereomers due to low 1,3-asym-
metric induction.2b On the other hand, J ackson has
recently shown that (E)-N-[(p-tolylsulfonyl)vinyl]sulfox-
imines undergo nucleophilic epoxidation with LiOO-t-Bu
with complete geometric and facial selectivity to produce
the corresponding oxiranes.3,4 J ackson’s results conclu-
sively established that a chiral sulfoximine sulfur atom
may be a powerful element of stereocontrol in this
process. Within the context of an ongoing project ad-
dressing multiple sulfur to carbon chirality transfer
operations using vinyl sulfoxides, we required an efficient
route to enantiopure vinyl epoxy sulfoxides of general
structure B, R2 ) vinyl (Scheme 1), with high regiocon-
trol, E-Z stereocontrol, and diastereofacial selectivity.
We envisioned that the nucleophilic epoxidation of readily
available5 2-sulfinyl dienes A, R2 ) vinyl, could be a
viable albeit challenging route, and aware of the synthetic
usefulness of sulfinyl oxiranes,2 we undertook the devel-
opment of such a process as a general reaction of alkenyl
sulfoxides. In this paper, we describe our preliminary
results of the unprecedented direct epoxidation of simple
vinyl sulfoxides.
At the inception of this research we recognized two
difficulties associated with our approach to epoxy sul-
foxides B (Scheme 1), namely, alkenyl sulfoxides, A, are
only moderately electron deficient6 and they are readily
oxidized to the corresponding sulfones C which may
undergo nucleophilic epoxidation to yield racemic D. In
contrast, vinyl sulfoximines are powerful Michael accep-
tors and cannot be oxidized readily. In addition, the
desired sulfinyl oxiranes B should undergo oxidation even
more readily to produce epoxy sulfones D. Since most
Weitz-Scheffer reaction conditions are also relatively
strongly oxidizing, the viability and, at best, the facial
selectivity of this epoxidation became a matter of concern.
Considering this, we selected simple vinyl sulfoxides 1-6
and dienyl sulfoxides 7 and 85,7 as substrates for this
study, and the results obtained are shown in Table 1.
At the initial stage of this research we focused our
efforts on keto vinyl sulfoxide 1 to establish whether a
sufficiently activated substrate could undergo epoxidation
without significant oxidation to the sulfone. Indeed,
treatment of 1 with LiOO-t-Bu led to a mixture of four
diastereomeric epoxy sulfoxides, presumably geometric
and facial isomers, with low selectivity. This disappoint-
ing result demonstrated that, at least for short reaction
times, these conditions were compatible with the sulfinyl
functionality.
The reactivity of simple E alkenyl sulfoxides 2 and 3
was then studied. Phenyl-substituted sulfoxide 2 was
found to be totally unreactive under a number of experi-
mental conditions.8 The well-known lack of reactivity of
2 with nucleophiles9 prompted us to study 3, but unfor-
tunately, our initial efforts led to almost exclusive forma-
tion of sulfone 9. After considerable experimentation,10
we succeeded in obtaining the desired epoxy sulfoxides
10 and 11 (Table 1, entry 3) albeit in low selectivity and
accompanied by relatively large amounts of sulfone 9.
The influence of the alkene geometry on the process
was then addressed (Table 1, entries 4 and 5), and both
Z substrates studied, 4 and 5, afforded good yields of
epoxy sulfoxides 13 and 16 with remarkable stereoselec-
tivities. Furthermore, overoxidation to sulfones 12 and
15 was hardly a problem in these cases.11 In view of the
high reactivity displayed by 5, we studied tert-butyl
sulfoxide 6 and, while the reaction was somewhat slower
than for the p-tolyl analogue 5, practically a single isomer
of an epoxy sulfoxide was obtained in excellent yield.12
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 34-(1)-562-
2900 ext 210. Fax: 34-(1)-564-4853. E-mail: RIF@CC.CSIC.ES.
† Dedicated to the memory of Professor Fe´lix Serratosa.
‡ Instituto de Qu´ımica Orga´nica.
(6) Simple vinyl sulfoxides display a relatively low reactivity with
nucleophiles. See, for instance: The Chemistry of Sulphones and
Sulphoxides; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Stirling, C. J . H., Eds.; J ohn
Wiley & Sons: New York, 1988.
§ Universidad Complutense.
(7) Substrates 2-5 were prepared in one step from commercially
available reagents by the method of Craig. See: Craig, D.; Daniels,
K.; McKenzie, A. R. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 11263-11304. Alternatively,
3 could be prepared with high selectivity in two steps according to:
Kosugi, H.; Kitaoka, M.; Tagami, K.; Takahashi, A.; Uda, H. J . Org.
Chem. 1987, 52, 1078-1082. For the preparation of 1 see: Marino, J .
P.; Viso, A.; Ferna´ndez de la Pradilla, R.; Ferna´ndez, P. J . Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 1349-1351. Racemic 6, available in our laboratories from a
previous project, was prepared from 1-hexyne by free radical addition
of 2-methyl-2-propanethiol and oxidation. All new products reported
here have been fully characterized by spectroscopic techniques.
(8) Forcing reaction conditions (long reaction times, higher temper-
atures) led to oxidation to the vinyl sulfone and, in some cases,
subsequent epoxidation. For the oxidation of sulfoxides with t-BuOOH,
see: Breton, G. W.; Fields, J . D.; Kropp, P. J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 3825-3828.
(1) Taken in part from the M.S. Theses of S.C., P.M., and J .P.,
Instituto de Qu´ımica Orga´nica, CSIC.
(2) (a) For a review, see: Satoh, T.; Yamakawa, K. Synlett 1992,
455-468. (b) Satoh, T.; Oohara, T.; Ueda, Y.; Yamakawa, K. J . Org.
Chem. 1989, 54, 3130-3136. (c) For an isolated example of an
alternative method, see: Tsuchihashi, G.; Mitamura, S.; Ogura, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 455-458.
(3) Briggs, A. D.; J ackson, R. F. W.; Clegg, W.; Elsegood, M. R. J .;
Kelly, J .; Brown, P. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6945-6948.
(4) For leading references on related nucleophilic epoxidations,
see: (a) J ackson, R. F. W.; Standen, S. P.; Clegg, W. J . Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1995, 149-156. (b) Linderman, R. J .; Claasen, R. J .,
II; Viviani, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6611-6614. (c) Ambroise,
L.; J ackson, R. F. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2311-2314.
(5) See: Paley, R. S.; Weers, H. L.; Ferna´ndez de la Pradilla, R.;
Castro, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3605-3608 and references cited
therein.
(9) Pyne, S. G.; Bloem, P.; Chapman, S. L.; Dixon, C. E.; Griffith,
R. J . Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1086-1093.
S0022-3263(96)00384-2 CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society