We have previously observed that the crystal packing of
compound 1 follows the assembly paradigm given in Figure
1. Hydrogen-bonded tapes (Figure 2, one tape is shown in
Figure 4. Conformers present in the crystal structure of 2.
Figure 2. Cross section perpendicular to the hydrogen bonding
axis from the crystal structure of compound 1. Molecular recogni-
tion elements include hydrogen-bonded tapes (red), arene edge-to-
face interactions (blue), and van der Waals contacts (green).
Figure 5. View of the unit cell (shown) from the crystal struc-
ture of 2 illustrating hydrogen bonding and arene edge-to-face
interactions between conformers A (red) and D (dark blue).
Conformers B and C, which coreside with A and D, and the dodecyl
chains of conformers A and D have been omitted for clarity.
red) associate via arene edge-to-face interactions (blue) to
give sheets that maximize van der Waals contacts (green)
in the solid.2a Other piperazinediones with topology similar
to 1 pack similarly.2b
Poly(methylene) chains longer than butyl generally adopt
an extended zigzag conformation and pack in either a parallel
or an antiparallel fashion in the crystalline state.6 Given this
fact and the observed packing in the crystal of 1, we
(2) (a) Williams, L. J.; Jagadish, B.; Kloster, R. A.; Lyon, S. R.; Carducci,
M. D.; Mash, E. A. Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 14281-14300. (b) Williams,
L. J.; Jagadish, B.; Lansdown, M. G.; Carducci, M. D.; Mash, E. A.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 14301-14322. (c) Jagadish, B.; Williams, L. J.;
Carducci, M. D.; Bosshard, C.; Mash, E. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
9483-9487. (d) Jagadish, B.; Carducci, M. D.; Bosshard, C.; Gu¨nter, P.;
Margolis, J. I.; Williams, L. J.; Mash, E. A. Cryst. Growth Des. 2003, 3,
0000-0000.
(3) Many examples of “ladder-like” tapes have been reported. See:
MacDonald, J. C.; Whitesides, G. M. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 2383-2420.
(4) (a) Waters, M. L. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 736-741. (b)
Hobza, P.; Selzle, H. L.; Schlag, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3500-
3506. (c) Jorgensen, W. L.; Severance, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
4768-4774. (d) Burley, S. K.; Petsco, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
7995-8001. (e) Karlstro¨m, G.; Linse, P.; Wallqvist, A.; Jo¨nsson, B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 3777-3782. (f) Ribas, J.; Cubero, E.; Luque, F. J.;
Orozco, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7057-7065. (g) Nakamura, K.; Houk,
K. N. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 2049-2051. (h) Kim, E.; Paliwal, S.; Wilcox, C.
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11192-11193. (i) Umezawa, Y.;
Tsuboyama, S.; Honda, K.; Uzawa, J.; Nishio, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1998, 71, 1207-1213. (j) Paliwal, S.; Geib, S.; Wilcox, C. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 4497-4499.
(5) (a) Depero, L. E. AdV. Mol. Struct. Res. 1995, 1, 303-337. (b)
Perlstein, J. NATO Sci. Ser. C 1999, 538, 23-42. (c) Desiraju, G. R. Nature
Mater. 2002, 1, 77-79. (d) Organic zeolites are exceptions; see: Feldman,
K. S.; Liu, Y.; Saunders, J. C.; Masters, K. M.; Campbell, R. F. Heterocycles
2001, 55, 1527-1554 and references therein.
Figure 3. Hypothetical tape cross section and anticipated crystal
packing viewed perpendicular to the hydrogen bonding axis for
compound 2.
3684
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 20, 2003