H. Hashimoto et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 65–68
67
Table 2. In vitro human COX-2a and COX-1b enzyme inhibitory
concentration of 4-cyclohexyl-5-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl) oxazole
derivatives
Zweifel, B. S.; Manning, P. T.; Hauser, S. D.; Leahy, K. M.;
Smith, W. G.; Isakson, P. C.; Seibert, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1994, 91, 3228. (c) Griswold, D. E.; Adams, J. L. Med.
Res. Rev. 1996, 16, 181.
Compd
R3
COX-2COX-1
IC50 (mM)c
5. (a) Prasit, P.; Reondeau, D. Ann. Rep. Med. Chem. 1997,
32, 211. (b) Carter, J. S. Exp. Opin. Ther. Pat. 1998, 8, 21. (c)
Dannhardt, G.; Kiefer, W. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 36, 109.
6. Penning, T. D.; Tally, J. J.; Bertenshaw, S. R.; Carter, J. S.;
Collins, P. W.; Doctor, S.; Graneto, M. J.; Lee, L. F.; Mal-
echa, J. W.; Miyashiro, J. M.; Rogers, R. S.; Rogier, D. J.; Yu,
S. S.; Anderson, G. D.; Burton, E. G.; Cogburn, J. N.; Gre-
gory, S. A.; Koboldt, C. M.; Perkins, W. E.; Seibert, K.;
Veenhuizen, A. W.; Zhang, Y. Y.; Isakson, P. C. J. Med.
Chem. 1997, 40, 1347.
IC50 (mM)c
1g
1n
1o
Me
Et
Ph
0.07
0.27
>100
>100
60
>100
aHuman recombinant COX-2enzyme.
bHuman COX-1 enzyme from human platelets.
cValues are means of at least three experiments.
7. Prasit, P.; Wang, Z.; Brideau, C.; Chan, C.-C.; Charleson,
S.; Cromlish, W.; Ethier, D.; Evans, J. F.; Ford-Hutchinson,
A. W.; Gauthier, J. Y.; Gordon, R.; Guay, J.; Gresser, M.;
Kargman, S.; Kennedy, B.; Leblanc, Y.; Leger, S.; Mancini, J.;
O’Neill, G. P.; Ouellet, M.; Percival, M. D.; Perrier, H.;
Riendeau, D.; Rodger, I.; Tagari, P.; Therien, M.; Vikers, P.;
Wong, E.; Xu, L.-J.; Young, R. N.; Zamboni, R.; Boyce, S.;
Rupniak, N.; Forrest, M.; Visco, D.; Patrick, D. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 1773.
8. (a) Haruta, J.; Hashimoto, H.; Matsushita, M. JP 8-
325249, 1996; Chem. Abstr. 1996, 125, 167967. (b) Norman,
B. H.; Lee, L. F.; Masferrer, J. L; Talley, J. J. WO 9427980,
1994; Chem. Abstr. 1995, 122, 314540.
that cyclohexyl ring successfully worked as a bioisostere
of pheny ring in this case.
Both methylsulfone and sulfonamide are well recog-
nized to be important moieties for COX-2inhibition, 6,16
and it is generally seen that sulfonamides are more
potent than methylsulfones, but less selective COX-2
inhibitors.16,17 This phenomenon was also seen in our
oxazole derivatives as shown in Table 1. Sulfonamides
1j–l were equally or slightly more potent for COX-2
compared to the corresponding methysulfones but the
selectivities are reduced. To investigate the effect of
steric bulkiness in this moiety, ethylsulfone 1i and
N-methylsulfonamide 1m were examined. Both com-
pounds exhibit markedly reduced activity. Therefore,
the COX-2activity is very sensitive to the steric
bulkiness of R2.
9. Haruta, J.; Hashimoto, H.; Matsushita, M. WO 9619463,
1996; Chem. Abstr. 1996, 125, 167971.
10. Syntheses of these compounds were performed by the
method described in ref 5 as follows.
Cyclohexyl (4-methylsulfonyl)benzyl ketone 4g. To a solution
of cyclohexanecarbonyl chloride (6.18 g), 2.32 g of tetra-
kis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) and zinc powder (3.42g)
in 1,2-DME (200 mL) was added a solution of (4-methyl-
sulfonyl)benzylbromide (10.00 g) in DME (100 mL) drop-
wise at room temperature. After stirring for 2h, the
insoluble material was removed by filtration. The filtrate
was concentrated in vacuo and the residue dissolved in
AcOEt. The solution was washed with 2N aq HCl and brine
and was dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed by
evaporation in vacuo. The residue was precipitated in AcOEt–
iPr2O. The precipitates were collected by filtration to give
5.42g (48%) of 4g. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.2–1.4
(m, 5H), 1.7 (m, 1H), 1.8–1.9 (m, 4H), 2.47 (m, 1H), 3.05
(s, 3H), 3.85 (s, 2H), 7.38 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.90 (d,
J=8.3 Hz, 2H).
Next, we examined the effect of the substituent size at
the 2-position of the oxazole. As shown in Table 2, ethyl
group (1n) instead of methyl showed reduced activity
and phenyl (1o) is no more active. COX-2activity is
very sensitive to the bulkiness of the substituent at this
position.
Conclusion
We have designed and synthesized a series of 4-aryl/
cycloalkyl-5-phenyl oxazole derivatives and showed that
they are potent and selective COX-2inhibitors. The
structure–activity relationship study suggests that (1) a
phenyl ring of vicinal diaryl heterocyclic compound can
be replaced by cyclohexyl or thienyl ring in the oxazole
case, (2) sulfonamides are slightly more potent but less
selective inhibitors than methylsulfones, and (3) COX-2
activity is very sensitive to the substituent size at sulfo-
nyl moiety and 2-position of the oxazole ring.
2-Cyclohexyl-1-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl)-2-oxo ethyl acetate
5g. A solution of 4g (1.48 g) and lead tetraacetate (2.50 g) in
AcOH (20 mL) was heated at reflux for 3 h. The solvent was
removed by evaporation in vacuo. The residue was diluted
with AcOEt and washed with water and brine and dried over
Na2SO4. After evaporation of the solvent in vacuo, the residue
was purified by flash chromatography (SiO2, hexane/
1
AcOEt=5/2) to give 0.52 g (29%) of 5g. H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): d 1.1–1.4 (m, 5H), 1.6–2.0 (m, 5H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 2.47
(m, 1H), 3.07 (s, 3H), 6.16 (s, 1H), 7.63 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H),
7.98 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H).
4-Cyclohexyl-2-methyl-5-(4-methylsulfonyl)phenyl
1g. A solution of 5g (0.52g) and NH Cl (0.29 g) in AcOH (10
oxazole
References and Notes
4
mL) was heated at reflux for 4 h. The solvent was removed by
evaporation in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chro-
matography (SiO2, hexane/AcOEt=1/1) to give 0.38 g (77%)
of 1g. mp 110 ꢀC. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.20–1.98
(m, 10H), 2.51 (s, 3H), 2.82 (m, 1H), 3.08 (s, 3H), 7.72 (d,
J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.98 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H). IR (cmÀ1): 2927,
2853, 1602, 1578, 1308, 1152. MS (FAB+): 320 (MH). Anal.
(C17H21NO3S): calcd: C; 63.92, H; 6.63, N; 4.39. Found: C;
63.83, H; 6.69, N; 4.19.
1. Allison, M. C.; Howatson, A. G.; Torrance, C. J.; Lee,
F. D.; Russell, R. Y. G. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992, 327, 749.
2. Vane, J. R. Nature 1971, 231, 232.
3. (a) Xie, W.; Chipman, J. G.; Robertson, D. L.; Erikson,
R. L.; Simmons, D. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991, 88,
2692. (b) Kujubu, D. A.; Fletcher, B. S.; Varnum, B. C.; Lim,
R. W.; Herschman, H. R. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 12866.
4. (a) Vane, J. Nature 1994, 367, 215. (b) Masferrer, J. L.;