Glycosylated Antitumor Ether Lipids
J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996, Vol. 39, No. 17 3245
(OCH2), 71.97 (C-1), 70.16 (C-3), 69.53 (C-2), 56.02 (OCH3).
Compound 12: 0.12 g (7.6% yield). 1H-NMR: δ 6.87-6.80 (m,
4H, Ph), 3.89 (d, 2H, J ) 4.4 Hz), 3.73-3.48 (m, 5H, H-1a,
H-1b, H-2, H-3a, H-3b), 3.63 (s, OCH3), 2.25 (1H, OH), 1.60 (t,
2H, J ) 6.0 Hz, CH2), 1.25 (s, 26H, CH2), 0.88 (t, 3H, J ) 6.0
Hz, CH3). 13C-NMR: δ 115.93, 114.99 (Ar), 78.69 (C-2), 62.75
(C-1), 56.03 (OCH3).
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Meth yla tion of Alcoh ols. To a
stirred solution of the alcohols (1 mmol) in dry DMF (5 mL)
was added sodium hydride (2.5 mmol) portionwise at 0 °C.
After the mixture was stirred for 30 min, methyl iodide (2.5
mmol) was added. The reaction was stirred at room temper-
ature. Once the reaction was complete, methanol was added
at 0 °C to destroy the excess of sodium hydride. The solvent
was evaporated under vacuum, and the residue was dissolved
in ethyl acetate. The organic solution was washed with water
and brine, dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and evaporated. This
reaction afforded pure products; therefore, chromatographic
purification was not necessary except for characterization
purposes.
1-O-Hexa d ecyl-2-O-m eth yl-3-O-(4-m eth oxyp h en yl)-sn -
glycer ol (13). Compound 11 (1.2 g, 2.84 mmol) was meth-
ylated as described above to give 13 as a white solid (1.2 g) in
97% yield after column purification; [R]D -6.9°; 13C-NMR: δ
115.90, 114.99 (Ar), 78.8 (C-2), 72.02, 71.98, 70.20 (C-1, C-3,
OCH2), 57.88, 56.02 (OCH3).
1-O-Hexa d ecyl-2-O-m eth yl-sn -glycer ol (7). To a solution
of 13 (1.0 g, 2.3 mmol) in 4:1 acetonitrile-water (21 mL) was
slowly added ammonium cerium(IV) nitrate (2.9 g, 5.5 mmol)
at 0 °C with vigorous stirring. The mixture was stirred at
room temperature for 1 h. After this time TLC (4:1 hexanes-
ethyl acetate) showed complete conversion of 13 into the title
compound. The reaction was quenched by the addition of
sodium sulfite (1.0 g). The mixture was diluted with ethyl
acetate, and the organic solution was washed with water and
brine, dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and evaporated. The residue
was purified by column chromatography (6:1 hexane-ethyl
acetate) to give 7 (0.853 g, 94%) as a low-melting white solid;
[R]D -9.5°; lit.10 [R]D -10.13° (c 1.5, CHCl3), lit.25 [R]D -9.92°
(c 1.64, CHCl3), lit.8 [R]D -9.46° (c 1.64, CHCl3).
2-O-Ace t yl-3,4,6-t r i-O-b e n zyl-r,â-D-glu cop yr a n osyl
Tr ich lor oa cetim id a te (8). To a solution of 1,2-di-O-acetyl-
3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-â-D-glucopyranose16 (16, 1.0 g, 1.87 mmol)
in dry DMF (10 mL) was added hydrazine acetate (0.213 g,
2.32 mmol). The mixture was stirred under nitrogen for 4 h.
After this time TLC (4:1 hexane-ethyl acetate) showed that
the reaction was complete. The mixture was diluted with ethyl
acetate and washed with water and brine. The organic layer
was dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and evaporated to give 18
quantitatively (0.921 g). The crude hemiacetal 18 was pure
enough to continue with this procedure. Compound 18 was
dried under vacuum for 4 h and then dissolved in dry
dichloromethane (30 mL). Trichloroacetonitrile (0.231 mL)
and anhydrous potassium carbonate (1.22 g) were added. The
mixture was stirred for 3 h under nitrogen. TLC (4:1 hexane-
ethyl acetate) showed traces of 18 and the faster-running title
compound. The reaction was quenched by filtration of the
inorganic base through a pad of Celite 545, and the solvent
was evaporated. Crude 8 was then purified through a short
column using 8:1 hexanes-ethyl acetate to give the glucosyl
donor 8 in 85% yield. 1H-NMR: δ 8.63 (s, 0.46H, NH), 8.56
(s, 0.56H, NH), 7.32-7.15 (m, 15H, 3Ph), 6.52 (d, 0.53H, J 1,2
) 3.5 Hz, H-1a), 5.74 (d, 0.46H, J 1,2 ) 8.0 Hz, H-1b), 5.29 (dd,
0.46H, J 2,3 ) 9.4 Hz, H-2b isomer), 5.09 (dd, 0.53H, J 2,3 ) 10.0
Hz, H-2a isomer), 1.99 (s, CH3CO).
2-O-Acet yl-3,4,6-t r i-O-b en zyl-r,â-D-m a n n op yr a n osyl
Tr ich lor oa cetim id a te (9). Benzylated 1,2-orthoester 15 (3.0
g) was hydrolyzed in 80% HOAc (50 mL) at room temperature
for 6 h. After this time, TLC (2:1 hexanes-ethyl acetate)
showed complete conversion of 15 into a slower-moving mate-
rial. Acetic acid was coevaporated under vacuum with toluene
to afford pure 17 quantitatively (3.0 g). Hemiacetal 17 was
dried under vacuum overnight. Compound 17 was treated
with trichloroacetonitrile-potassium carbonate as described
for 8 to give the mannosyl donor 9 in 96% yield (3.8 g). 1H-
NMR: δ 8.71 (s, NH), 8.63 (s, NH), 7.35-6.78 (m, 15H, 3Ph),
6.29 (d, H-1â), 5.89 (d, H-1R), 5.49 (dd, H-2), 4.89-4.47 (m),
4.06-3.68 (m), 2.18 (s, 3H, CH3).
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Glycosyla tion of 7 w ith 1,2-
tr a n s-Glycosyl Don or s 8 a n d 9. A mixture of the glycosyl
donor 8 or 9 (1.4 mmol) and the glycosyl acceptor 7 (1.3 mmol)
in anhydrous dichloromethane (30 mL) was stirred under dry
nitrogen with molecular sieves (3 Å) for 20 min at room
temperature. The mixture was cooled at -78 °C, and TMSOTf
(50 µmol, 0.035 equiv) was added. Every reaction was
complete in 10 min. The Lewis acid was neutralized at room
temperature with triethylamine (20 µL). The solvent was
evaporated and the crude 1,2-trans-glycopyranosides were
purified by column chromatography.
1-O-Hexa d ecyl-2-O-m eth yl-3-O-(2′-O-a cetyl-3′,4′,6′-tr i-
O-ben zyl-â-D-glu copyr a n osyl)-sn -glycer ol (19). Compound
7 (433.3 mg, 1.3 mmol) was glucosylated with 8 (930 mg, 1.4
1
mmol) to give 19 in 76% yield (805 mg); [R]D -8.5°; H-NMR:
δ 7.32-7.15 (m, 15H, 3PhCH2), 4.99 (dd, 1H, J 1′,2′ ) 7.9 Hz,
J 2′,3′ ) 8.4 Hz, H-2′), 4.78 and 4.66 (2d, 2H, J ) 11 Hz, CH2Ph),
4.78 and 4.54 (2d, 2H, J ) 12 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.63 and 4.54 (2d,
2H, J ) 12 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.49 (d, 1H, H-1′), 3.92-3.35 (12H),
3.41 (s, CH3O), 1.95 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 1.59 (m, 4H, 2CH2), 1.25
(s, 26H, CH2), 0.87 (t, 3H, J ) 6 Hz, CH3). 13C-NMR: δ 169.6
(CO), 138.27, 128.41, 127.98, 127.80 (Ph), 101.39 (C-1′), 57.9
(CH3O), 20.85 (CH3CO), 14.06 (CH3).
1-O-Hexa d ecyl-2-O-m eth yl-3-O-(2′-O-a cetyl-3′,4′,6′-tr i-
O-ben zyl-r-D-m a n n op yr a n osyl)-sn -glycer ol (20). Com-
pound 7 (0.871 g, 2.6 mmol) was glycosylated with 9 (1.90 mg,
2.9 mmol) to give the title compound in 87% yield (1.83 g);
[R]D +37.5°; 1H-NMR: δ 7.33-7.12 (m, 15H, 3PhCH2), 5.37
(dd, 1H, J 2′,3′ ) 2.7 Hz, H-2′), 4.86 (d, 1H, J 1′,2′ ) 1.6 Hz, H-1′),
4.86 and 4.49 (2d, 2H, J ) 11 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.70 and 4.54 (2d,
2H, J ) 11 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.69 and 4.50 (2d, 2H, J ) 12 Hz,
CH2Ph), 2.14 (s, 3H, CH3CO), 1.54 (t, 2H, J ) 6.0 Hz), 1.25 (s,
26H), 0.87 (t, 3H). 13C-NMR: δ 170.39 (CO), 138.50, 132.29,
128.28, 127.55 (Ph), 98.17 (C-1′), 58.07 (CH3O), 31.90, 29.51,
26.10, 21.07 (CH2), 14.07 (CH3).
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Dea cetyla tion . Compounds 19
and 20 were deacetylated at room temperature with dry
ammonia gas dissolved in dry methanol in 15 min, giving 21
and 22, respectively. This reaction is quantitative and gives
very pure products. Methanol was evaporated, and the
alcohols were dried under vacuum and used in the next step.
1-O-Hexa d ecyl-2-O-m eth yl-3-O-(3′,4′,6′-tr i-O-ben zyl-2′-
O-m et h yl-â-D-glu cop yr a n osyl)-sn -glycer ol (23). Com-
pound 21 (149 mg) was 2′-O-methylated as described above
in 97% yield (145 mg); [R]D -9.7° (c 1.2, CHCl3); 13C-NMR: δ
138.89, 138.34, 128.34, 127.93, 127.71, 127.55 (Ph), 103.88 (C-
1′), 60.45, 57.88 (CH3O), 31.95, 29.69, 29.52, 29.35, 26.16, 22.68
(CH2), 14.06 (CH3).
1-O-Hexa d ecyl-2-O-m eth yl-3-O-(3′,4′,6′-tr i-O-ben zyl-2′-
O-m eth yl-r-D-m a n n op yr a n osyl)-sn -glycer ol (24). Com-
pound 22 (39.6 mg) was methylated in 98% yield (39 mg); [R]D
+38.3°; 13C-NMR: δ 138.89, 138.34, 128.34, 127.93, 127.71,
127.55 (Ph), 98.5 (C-1′), 59.99, 57.80 (CH3O), 31.95, 29.69,
29.52, 29.35, 26.16, 22.68 (CH2), 14.06 (CH3).
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Syn th esis of Xa n th a tes 25 a n d
26. Sodium hydride (15 mg, 0.62 mmol) was added to an ice-
cold solution of the alcohol (150 mg, 0.32 mmol) and imidazole
(4 mg, 0.055 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL). The mixture was
stirred for 1 h at room temperature under dry nitrogen, and
carbon disulfide (0.32 mmol) was added. Stirring was contin-
ued for 20 min, and methyl iodide (2.5 mmol) was added. The
reaction was monitored by TLC (3:1 hexanes-ethyl acetate).
Complete conversion of the respective alcohol into xanthate
25 or 26 was observed in each reaction. Methanol was added
at 0 °C to destroy the excess of sodium hydride. The solvent
was evaporated and the residue was dissolved in ether. The
organic solution was washed with water, dilute hydrochloric
acid, and water, dried (Na2SO4), and evaporated. These
compounds were used in the next step without further
characterization.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Ra d ica l Red u ction of Xa n -
th a tes. A solution of â-glycoside 25 (precursor to 2) or
R-glycoside 26 (precursor to 3) (100 mg, 0.117 mmol) in dry
toluene (4 mL) was added dropwise to a refluxing solution of