Organic Letters
Letter
the diarylated product as a 3:1 mixture of 8-di isomers, with
monoarylated all-equatorial 8-mono isolated in 9% yield. An
O-benzyl group was tolerated, giving 40% of the diarylated
product, surprisingly for this substrate the major isomer of 9-di
was that with an axial benzyloxy group (12% of the
monoarylated species 9-mono was also isolated). A difluoro
substituent at the 4-position gave a higher proportion of
monoarylation product 10-mono to 10-di.
A 3-Me group gave the monoarylated product in 24% yield,
with the PMP group installed at the least hindered position,
and 12% of the all-equatorial 1,2,3,4-functionalized aldehyde
11-di. A one-pot tetrarylation was possible on a substrate with
two cyclohexylcarbaldehyde groups connected at the four
position, providing major isomer 12 in 32% yield (75% yield
per arylation). A crystal structure of 12 confirmed the all-
equatorial stereochemistry.
Surprisingly, cyclohexane rings had unique reactivity. Other
ring sizes (3-, 4-, 5-, 7-, and 8-) and acyclic 2-ethylbutanal did
not form significant amounts of the diarylated products.9 The
monoarylated product was isolated in low yield for the
cyclopentane substrate (17% monoarylated using 4-iodoani-
sole). However, under these conditions using the 3- and 4-
membered rings only starting material was returned. In the
larger 7-/8-membered rings, the major products were a mixture
of α−β-unsaturated aldehydes.9
Therefore, we considered the mechanism of the reaction,
aiming to explain these interesting reactivity and stereo-
chemical observations. Conducting the arylation in deuterated
solvents revealed full deuteration of the α-C−H for the mono-
and diarylated products (Scheme 4a). This is consistent with
enamine formation under the reaction conditions. Deuteration
at the benzylic positions was not observed in the products,
suggesting an irreversible C−H activation. The stereochemical
outcome of the tert-butyl derivative provided further insight. In
an imine mechanism, the only possibilities suitable to form the
all-equatorial product would be (i) a trans-equatorial pallada-
cycle giving the observed product directly or (ii) a cis
palladacycle with the imine in the axial position, with the
observed product formed on aldehyde epimerization (Scheme
4b). Other potential palladacycles would result in the wrong
product.9
Notably, the tertiary aldehyde methylcyclohexane carbox-
aldehyde was unreactive, as was pivaldehyde, which present
more reactive methyl C−H bonds (Scheme 4c). Given these
results we propose an alternative role for the transient directing
group, as a X,L enamine ligand, rather than an imine (Scheme
4d). This cannot be achieved with the tertiary aldehydes. The
enamine geometry is well aligned with the C−H bonds for the
trans-arylation on the 6-membered ring. However, such an
intermediate would likely lead to increased ring strain, in
comparison to an imine mechanism for both small and
medium sized rings, or to poorer overlap of the β-C−H bond.
The observed stereochemistry can be rationalized though
enamine coordination of the PdII catalyst with the cyclohexyl
ring in a chair conformation and with large 4-substituents
equatorial. The second arylation would then occur in the same
manner, with the installed Ar group also equatorial. Hydrolysis
of the enamine would give the favored trans-product as
observed. Unfortunately, attempts to characterize potential
intermediates were unsuccessful.
Consequently, we propose a catalytic cycle involving an
enamine-derived Pd cycle (Scheme 5). The aldehyde first
condenses with the amine and forms an X, L enamine ligand
with the PdII catalyst (I). C−H activation occurs at the
proximal C−H promoted by the pyridone, affording cyclo-
metalated intermediate II. Oxidative addition and reductive
elimination steps install the first aryl group giving complex IV.
Scheme 4. Mechanistic Considerations
Scheme 5. Proposed Catalytic Cycle
D
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX