Communication
group has an inductive effect on the formation of the new chi-
ral center (Scheme 4). The results of forming 1,3-diol 2a/2a′ in
93 % yield but with a low diastereoselectivity (dr = 3:4) conform
that hydroboration of alkenes follows anti-Markovnikov's rule
and hydroxyl group has no inductive effect on the diastereo-
selectivity of this reaction.
Scheme 7. Hydroboration of allylic alcohol derivative.
In conclusion, we have developed a copper-catalyzed highly
stereospecific hydroboration of internal allylic alcohols using a
silyl ether transient protection strategy. This in situ protection
effectively avoids the preferential side reaction of free hydroxyl
group with boron reagent, thus promoting hydroboration. This
method provides the both anti- and syn- diastereomers of 1,3-
diols in high level of diastereomeric ratios with good tolerance
of functional groups.
Scheme 4. Hydroboration of terminal allylic alcohol 1z.
To further demonstrate the utility of this methodology,
(–)-cis-Verbenol, which has anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory
activities,[13] was treated under our standard conditions. To our
delight, following anti-Markovnikov's rule, 1,2-diol 3 with five
contiguous stereogenic centers was obtained with good yield
and excellent diastereoselectivity control (Scheme 5).
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge National Natural Science Foundation of China
(21702105), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province,
China (BK20170981) and Nanjing Tech University for financial
support.
Keywords: Internal allylic alcohols · Silanes · Copper
catalysis · Stereospecific hydroboration · Diastereoselectivity
[1] a) H. C. Brown, G. W. Kramer, Organic synthesis via boranes; Wiley-Inter-
science: New York, 1975; b) D. G. Hall, Boronic Acids: Preparation and
Applications in Organic Synthesis Medicine and Materials, 2nd ed., Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 2011.
Scheme 5. Hydroboration of (–)-cis-Verbenol.
[2] For selected examples on the formation of carbon–carbon and carbon–
heteroatom bonds via organoboron intermediates, see: a) H. C. Brown,
B. Singaram, Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 287–293; b) D. S. Matteson, Stereo-
directed Synthesis with Organoboranes; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg,
1995; c) M. A. Oberli, S. L. Buchwald, Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4606–4609; d)
Y. Wang, A. Noble, E. Myers, V. K. Aggarwal, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016,
55, 4270–4274; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 4342–4346; e) Y. Wang, A. No-
ble, C. Sandford, V. K. Aggarwal, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1810–
1814; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 1836–1840; f) Z. He, H. Li, A. M. Haydl,
G. T. Whiteker, J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 17197–17202;
g) S. Namirembe, J. P. Morken, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3464–3474.
[3] For selected reviews on hydroboration, see: a) K. Burgess, M. J. Ohlmeyer,
Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 1179–1191; b) M. Zaidlewicz, Hydroboration; John
Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2000; c) J. V. Obligacion, P. J. Chirik, Nat. Rev. Chem.
2018, 2, 15–34; d) W. Ai, R. Zhong, X. Liu, Q. Liu, Chem. Rev. 2019, 119,
2876–2953.
We have also tried the asymmetric hydroboration of allylic
alcohol (1a) using (R)-DTBM-Segphos as the chiral ligand
(Scheme 6). We observed high diastereoselectivity in com-
pound 2a (dr = 98:2, 95 % yield), however, enantioselectivity
was completely absent.
[4] For natural compounds and drugs of 1,3-diols, see: a) W. J. Knoll, P. F.
Wiley, L. H. Li, J. Antibiot. 1980, 33, 249–251; b) H. A. Brooks, D. Gardner,
J. P. Pyser, T. J. King, J. Antibiot. 1984, 37, 1501–1504; c) S. D. Rychnovsky,
Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2021–2040; d) M. E. Rateb, W. E. Houssen, M. Arnold,
G. Ferguson, J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 1491–1499; e) A. Tripathi, M. M. Scho-
field, D. H. Sherman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1579–1586; erratum
2014, 136, 10541–10541; f) Z. Zheng, R. Jayaram, L. X. Jiang, J. Emberson,
Y. Zhao, Q. Li, J. Du, S. Guarguagli, M. Hill, Z. Chen, R. Collinsan, B. Casadei,
N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 1744–1753; g) T. Zarganes-Tzitzikas, C. G. Neo-
choritis, A. Domling, ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 389–392.
[5] H. C. Brown, G. M. Chen, M. P. Jennings, P. V. Ramachandran, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2052–2054; Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 2088–2090.
[6] a) D. A. Birtwistle, J. M. Brown, M. W. Foxton, Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27,
4367–4370; b) M. Defosseux, N. Blanchard, C. Meyer, J. Cossy, Tetrahedron
2005, 61, 7632–7653; c) J. Mulzer, A. Sieg, C. Brücher, D. Müller, H. J.
Scheme 6. Hydroboration of allylic alcohol using chiral ligand.
In order to understand the role of silyl ether protection, we
carried out hydroboration of TBS-protected allylic alcohol deriv-
ative (1ab) in the absence of Cu(OAc)2 and [(MeO)2SiHMe]. Fol-
lowed by oxidative workup and TBS deprotection, it affords diol
2a in 73 % yield with exclusive diastereoselectivity (dr = 24:1)
(Scheme 7). This result supports our proposed silyl ether pro-
tecting group strategy and suggests that copper catalyst is in-
volved in the step of silyl ether formation.[12]
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 0000, 0–0
4
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim