Cationic µ-2,4-Hexadiyne Bis(zirconocene)
Organometallics, Vol. 16, No. 7, 1997 1443
intermediate 8 reacts instantaneously with the neutral
bis(propynyl)zirconocene starting material present in
solution. The associative coupling of the organometallic
reagents is probably facilitated by the high propensity
of connecting the two electrophilic metal centers by
means of a thermodynamically favorable Zr2(µ-η1:η1-
alkynyl) linkagessuch acetylide bridges seem to be
among the strongest means of connecting two zirconium
centers by a hydrocarbyl bridging ligand.4,11,12 The
system is then further stabilized by the subsequent
carbon-carbon coupling of two of the propynyl groups
present at the dinuclear zirconocene systems to form
the 2,4-hexadiyne ligand, which is then stabilized by
forming the unsymmetrically bridged Zr2[µ-(η1-C:η2-C,C]
dinuclear metallocene cation system (9), exhibiting a
planar-tetracoordinate carbon atom. We had recently
shown that the formation of (µ-RCCR)Zr2 type cations
containing a planar-tetracoordinate carbon center is in
general very favorable. The formation of the dimetal-
labicyclic structure with this unusual carbon coordina-
tion geometry was found to be favored by ca. 10-12 kcal
mol-1 over the dimetallacyclopentene.4a Therefore, it
is not surprising to observe the analogous structural
type here.
Often the alkyl substituents at C2 of the planar-
tetracoordinate carbon complexes 3 form an agostic
interaction with their adjacent metal center (i.e., Zr2
in 3, see eq 1).4,15 In the new complex 9, such a σ-agostic
interaction cannot be formed straightforwardly, since
the favored regioisomer (9) has a -CtCCH3+ substitu-
ent attached at its planar-tetracoordinate bridgehead
carbon. Instead, the π-system of this substituent is used
to diminish the electron-deficiency of the nearby zir-
conocene group by forming a weak π-agostic interac-
tion.14
It may be that this coordinative acetylide to metal
interaction facilitates the novel type of dynamic process
observed to take place within the cation 9. The parent
planar-tetracoordinate carbon complexes 3 (see eq 1) are
known to rapidly exchange the three-center two-electron
bonding situation between the zirconium centers Zr1/
Zr2 and C1/C2.4a This type of degenerate rearrange-
ment (which reversibly interchanges the planar-tetra-
coordinate carbon bonding situation between carbon
atoms C2 and C1) is prohibited in 9 because of the
unsymmetrical substitution pattern. However, we ob-
serve an alternative low-energy automerization path-
way (∆Gq(190 K) ≈ 9.5 ( 0.5 kcal mol-1 from the
dynamic 1H NMR experiment at the Cp coalescence
temperature) that leads to a mutual exchange of the
propynyl moieties of the µ-2,4-hexadiyne ligand (and
hence an intramolecular equilibration of the metallocene
units).16
Our study has again shown that planar-tetracoordi-
nate carbon is enormously stabilized by two zirconium
centers in the environment of the dimetallabicyclic
framework encountered here. At the same time, it
appears that the dimetallic (Cp2Zr)2(µ-CtCR)+ cation
fragment is formed very easily and may allow for the
formation of novel types of dinuclear metallocene π-com-
plexes that may show interesting properties when used
as stoichiometric organometallic reagents or in catalysis.
We are currently trying to develop the chemistry of such
species experimentally.
Exp er im en ta l Section
All reactions were carried out in an inert atmosphere (argon)
using Schlenk-type glassware or in a glovebox. Solvents were
dried and distilled under argon prior to use. For additional
general information, including a list of spectrometers and
equipment used for the physical characterization, see ref 4a.
The following compounds and reagents were prepared accord-
ing to published procedures: bis(propynyl)titanocene, -zir-
conocene, and -hafnocene (1a -c),7 N,N-dimethylanilinium
tetraphenylborate,18 and trityl tetraphenylborate.19
Rea ction of th e Bis(p r op yn yl) Gr ou p 4 Meta llocen es
1a -c w ith N,N-Dim eth yla n ilin iu m Tetr a p h en ylbor a te.
These reactions were carried out in deuterated solvent in a
NMR tube. The products 6a -c plus propyne were not isolated
but only characterized spectroscopically (1H, 13C NMR). Gen-
eral procedure: a sample of ca. 10 mg of the respective complex
6 was mixed with an equimolar quantity of solid N,N-
dimethylanilinium tetraphenylborate in a 5 mm NMR tube.
Then, ca. 0.5 mL of tetrahydrofuran-d8 was added at -50 °C.
Propyne was formed at -40 °C, and the metallocene cation
systems 6 were spectroscopically characterized at tempera-
tures <0 °C to prevent rapid decomposition. Complex 6a
(prepared starting from 10 mg (39 µmol) of 1a ): 1H NMR
(THF-d8) δ 6.47 (s, 10H, Cp), 2.15 (s, 3H, CH3); δ 7.32 (m, 8H),
6.90 (m, 8H), 6.75 (m, 4H) (BPh4-); δ 7.14, 6.65 (m, 5H, Ph),
2.88 (s, 6H, CH3) (N,N-dimethylaniline); δ 2.02 (q, 1H, CH),
1.73 (d, 3H, CH3) (propyne). 13C NMR (THF-d8): δ 148.0, 77.0,
6.5 (CtC-CH3), 119.7 (Cp); δ 165.1 (1J BC ) 50 Hz), 137.1,
125.8, 122.0 (BPh4-); δ 151.6, 132.6, 117.0, 113.2, 40.5 (N,N-
dimethylaniline); δ 80.0, 68.4, 2.8 (propyne). Complex 6b
(prepared starting from 10 mg (33 µmol) of 1b): 1H NMR
(THF-d8) δ 6.45 (s, 10H, Cp), 1.94 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR
(THF-d8): δ 115.7 (Cp), 78.0, 5.8 (1 acetylide C not located).
Complex 6c (prepared starting from 8 mg (21 µmol) of 1c):
1H NMR (THF-d8) δ 6.38 (s, 10H, Cp), 1.96 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C
NMR (THF-d8): δ 114.9 (Cp), 139.6, 54.2, 5.7 (CtCCH3),
signals of BPh4-, N,N-dimethylaniline, and propyne, see above.
F or m a t ion of Bis(cyclop en t a d ien yl)b is(t et r a h yd r o-
fu r a n )tita n iu m (III) Tetr a p h en ylbor a te, 7. Bis(propynyl)-
titanocene (1a , 100 mg, 0.39 mmol) was mixed with 85 mg
(0.195 mmol) of N,N-dimethylanilinium tetraphenylborate;
then, 3 mL of THF was added. The mixture was briefly
homogenized with stirring and then left for 48 h at room
temperature without stirring. During that time, blue crystals
of 7 were formed that were characterized by an X-ray crystal
structure analysis of 7: formula C42H46O2BTi, Mw ) 641.50,
0.6 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm, a ) 13.008(3) Å, b ) 13.482(3) Å, c )
20.330(7) Å, â ) 106.98(2)°, V ) 3410(2) Å3, Fcalcd ) 1.250 g
cm-3, µ ) 2.87 cm-1, no absorption correction, Z ) 4, mono-
clinic, space group P21/c (No. 14), λ ) 0.710 73, ω/2θ scans,
Establishing the reaction pathway of this automer-
ization reaction in detail requires additional experimen-
tal investigations and probably a thorough theoretical
study, but it is likely that a symmetrical intermediate
geometry (transition state or high-lying reactive inter-
mediate) of a bis(π-alkyne)(ZrCp2)2(µ-CtCR) structural
type (10) is readily available starting from 9.6a,17
7224 reflections collected ((h,-k,(l), [(sin θ)/λ]max ) 0.62 Å-1
,
6921 independent and 4330 observed reflections [I > 2σ(I)],
(15) Horton, A. D.; Orpen, A. G. Angew. Chem. 1992, 104, 912;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 876.
(16) For a related exchange process of σ-acetylide ligands in di-
nuclear group 4 metallocene complexes, see: e.g. Erker, G.; Fro¨mberg,
W.; Benn, R.; Mynott, R.; Angermund, K.; Kru¨ger, C. Organometallics
1989, 8, 911.
(17) See for a comparison: Burlakov, V. V.; Ohff, A.; Lefeber, C.;
Tillack, A.; Baumann, W.; Kempe, R.; Rosenthal, U. Chem. Ber. 1995,
128, 967.
(18) Crane, F. E., J r. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 1794.
(19) Pohlmann, J . L. W.; Brinckmann, F. E. Z. Naturforsch. 1965,
20B, 5.