5690
W. M. Kazmierski et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 5689–5692
Bn
methyl)-3-morpholinone and the 5R-(phenylmethyl)-2-
pyrrolidinone (2) scaffold series and emphasizes a neces-
sity to optimize SAR in eachseries independently.
Bn
Bn
NH
a
b
NH
NH
R
O
R
O
O
We optimized P2-benzyl motif even further by alkylat-
ing 52,3 withvarious benzyl bromides X-Bn-Br, which
generally proceeded witha high trans diastereoselectiv-
ity (ratio of 3S,5R to 3R,5R diastereomers ꢀ4:1). Alkyl-
ating agents withmasked functionalities, suchas
m-methoxy-benzyl bromide, m- and p-nitro-benzyl bro-
mide were used towards syntheses of 19a, 17a, and
18a, respectively. The resulting intermediates were then
progressed as outlined in Figure 4, yielding pyrrolidones
15a–20a. These derivatives were then coupled to epoxide
13 under either equilibrating or non-equilibrating condi-
tions,5 followed by the acetonide deprotection.9 When
feasible, mixtures of diastereomers were then chromato-
graphically enriched to >95% optical purity, yielding PIs
15b, 17b, 19b, and 20b (Fig. 4, if diastereomers were sep-
arated, data is shown only for the more potent 3S,5R
(trans) diastereomer).5 Couplings of 16a and 18a to
epoxide 13 were performed under equilibrating condi-
tions, yielding equimolar mixtures of bothdiastereomers
16b and 18b (Fig. 4), which were evaluated as such in the
HIV-1 protease assay.10
R: 3-py 8
4-py 9
R: 3-py 6
4-py 7
5
c, d
Bn
13
O
O
N
O
N
A
Py
O
Ki [nM]
0.17
14.0
0.31
10 3-py diastereomer 1
11 3-py diastereomer 2
12 4-py diastereomeric mixture
Figure 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) LDA, THF ꢁ78°C, 3- and 4-
pyridinecarboxaldehydes; 73–87% (b) 5% PdÆC, CaCO3, H2 titration;
99%; (c) NaH/DMF 80°C, epoxide 13; (d) 4N HCl in dioxane/water
(95:5, v/v), silica purification, 31–69%.
and 9.7 Since our objective was to synthesize the trans
P1–P2 derivatives, cis intermediates were coupled to
epoxide 13 under conditions known to epimerize the 3-
position in 2-pyrrolidone (NaH/DMF, 80°C).5 Products
were then chromatographically separated into the indi-
vidual diastereomers 10 (Ki = 0.17nM) and 11
(Ki = 14nM) (Fig. 2). The 4-picolyl analogue 12 was
synthesized in a similar fashion yielding equimolar mix-
ture of diastereomers, which was assayed as such and
proved to also be potent in the HIV-1 protease assay
(Ki = 0.31nM).
Enzyme inhibition data for 15b–20b strongly suggests
that meta-substituents in 15b, 17b, and 19b yielded
inhibitors, which were practically equipotent to lead
molecule 4, with the exception of methyl ester derivative
20b. On the other hand, para-substituents in 16b and 18b
caused a significant decrease in potency against HIV-1
protease (Fig. 4), far beyond when their Ki values are
adjusted for 50% diastereomeric contents. We then at-
tempted to expand the SAR by directly derivatizing
these PIs. Thus, the oxidation of 15b withurea–hydro-
gen peroxide (UHP) provided potent carboxamide 21
(Ki = 0.1nM), while the alkylation of 19b withbromo-
acetonitrile resulted in an approximately equipotent
inhibitor 22 (Ki = 0.08nM), oxidation of which also
yielded potent carboxamide 23 (Ki = 0.09nM) (Fig. 5).
We also explored aliphatic P2-substituents in the context
of pyrrolidone P1–P2 scaffold 2. The rationale for this
was based on SAR established in another scaffold series;
5S-(phenylmethyl)-3-morpholinone, in which the P2-al-
lyl substituted analogue was found to be more potent
than the P2-benzyl-substituted analogue.8 Following
this lead, the synthesis of the P2-allyl pyrrolidone-based
inhibitor 14 was then accomplished by a diastereoselec-
tive alkylation of lactam 5 withallyl bromide and Boc-
deprotection, followed by coupling of epoxide 13 and
acetonide deprotection (Fig. 3).5
R
a, b
Bn
15a m-CN
16a p-CN
Bn
NH
a, b, f
17a m-NH2
18a p-NH2
R
O
Perhaps surprising in light of prior SAR, the allyl-P2
inhibitor 14 (Fig. 3, Ki = 0.45nM) was found less potent
than the benzyl-P2 lead 4 (Ki = 0.067nM).5 This finding
underscores different SAR in bothteh 5 S-(phenyl-
N
a, b, c
a, b
19a m-OH
Boc
4:1 trans/cis
O
20a m-COOMe
d, e, g
5
R
Ki [nM]
Bn
A
15b m-CN
16b p-CN
17b m-NH2
diastereomer 1
0.05
14
1:1 diast. mixture 0.34
N
diastereomer 1
1:1 diast. mixture
diastereomer 1
0.10
2.30
0.05
0.42
a, b, c, d
R
5
18b p-NH2
19b m-OH
O
OH
OH
H
N
N
20b m-COOMe diastereomer 1
O
O
Figure 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) LHMDS ꢁ78°C, R-Bn-Br, 79–
93%; (b) TFA; (c) BBr3; (d) P4-phosphazine 1equiv, THF, epoxide 13,
ꢁ78 to 0°C or NaH, DMF, 80°C; (e) 4N HCl in dioxane/water (95:5,
v/v), 56%–87% for (b)–(e); (f) PdÆC/H2; (g) silica gel chromatography,
51–73% for (f)–(g).
>95:5 trans/cis
Figure 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) LHMDS ꢁ78°C, allyl bromide,
78%; (b) TFA; (c) P4-phosphazine base, 1equiv, THF, epoxide 13, ꢁ78
to 0°C; (d) 4N HCl in dioxane/water (95:5, v/v), 81% for (b)–(d).