Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
1,2-addition of Cu-Bpin to the C=O via transition state TS1’. between the two corresponding transition states,ViewGArt‡i(cTleSO2nsliynne-
-1
The overall process has a low free energy barrier (15.9 24-TS2anti-24), is reduced to only 0.3 kcal·mDoOlI: 1(0s.e10e39F/iDgu0CreC0S262)6.3InB
kcal·mol-1) and it results in the thermodynamically stable, this case the bulky naphthyl substituent leads to 1,2 repulsive
intermediate I4’. Nevertheless, the pathway for C=C interactions with the carbonyl group in the anti path, which
borylcupration is kinetically preferred by 5.2 kcal·mol-1 (TS1 are similar to those between the carbonyl group and the -
versus TS1’in Figure 2), in agreement with the experimental CH2Bpin moiety in the syn isomer. Consequently, no
results. Table 2 compares the free-energy barriers for the two preference for any of the two diastereoisomers is observed.
competitive borylation processes in representative - In conclusion, borycupration of alkenyl aldehydes takes place
substituted alkenyl aldehydes 1, 7, 14, 24, and 27. chemoselectively on the C=C followed by intramolecular
Replacement of tetrahydropyran group in 1 by cyclohexane in electrophilic trapping of the aldehyde, with complete anti-
7 has a minor effect on the barriers. Then, incorporating diastereoselectivity. Disubstitution on the alpha-position to
aromatic substituents in the alkene moiety (substrates 14 and the aldehyde favours the cyclation but current work to extend
24) decreases the energy barrier for the borylation on C=C the reactivity to non-substituted substrates is ongoing.
bond providing the kinetic preference for ring closing Computational studies identify the key steps of the catalytic
products. Since boryl-copper complexes behave as cycle that govern the chemo- and the diastereoselectivity.
nucleophiles,10
the
electron-withdrawing
aromatic This research was supported by MINECO through projects
substituents enhance the reactivity of the double bond. On the CTQ2016-80328-P and PGC2018-100780-B-l00, and by and the
other hand, the methyl substituent in substrate 27 makes the Generalitat de Catalunya (2017-SGR629).
alkene fragment more electron rich, increasing the borylation
energy barrier and switching the chemoselectivity towards the
addition on the aldehyde moiety (product 29).
Notes and references
1
K. Kubota, H. Ito, in Advances in Organoboron Chemisty
toward Organic Synthesis, Chapter 8, Science of Synthesis,
Fernández, E. Ed. Thieme. 2019
K. Kubota, E. Yamamoto, H. Ito, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
2635.
E. Yamamoto, R. Kojima, K. Kubota, H. Ito, Synlett, 2015, 26,
272.
A. Whyte, B. Mirabi, A. Torelli, L. Prieto, J. Bajohr, M.
Lautens, ACS Catal, 2019, 9, 9253.
J. C. Green, M. V. Joannou, S. A. Murray, J. M. Zanghi, S. J.
Meek, ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 4441.
a) D. S. Laitar, E. Y. Tsui, J. P. Sadighi J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
128, 11036; b) C. M. Moore, C. R. Medina, P. C. Cannamela,
M. L. McIntosh, C. J. Ferber, A. Roering, T. B. Clark, T. B. Org.
Lett., 2014, 16, 6056.
E. M. Carreira, T. C. Fessard, Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 8257.
See Supporting Information for full computational details
J. Royes, S. Ni, A. Farre, E. La Cascia, J. J. Carbo, A. B. Cuenca,
F. Maseras, E. Fernández ACS Catal, 2018, 8, 2833.
Table 2. Calculated free-energy barriers and differences in kcal·mol-1 for the
borylcupration of C=C versus C=O bond, G‡(TS1-TS1’), and for the ring closing of
the diastereoselective anti versus syn paths, G‡(TS2anti-TS2syn).a
2
3
4
5
6
substrate
C=C:C=O (exp.)
100:0
G‡
10.7
12.6
9.3
G‡
15.9
16.9
15.9
11.7
13.1
G‡
17.6
18.7
10.1
G‡
+5.2
+4.3
+6.6
+9.0
-2.9
C=C
C=O
1
7
100:0
14
100:0
24
100:0
7.2
27
0:100
16.1
G‡
13.7
15.5
10.4
substrate
anti:syn (exp.)
100:0
G‡
+5.1
+3.2
+0.3
anti
syn
1
3
100:0
7
8
9
24
50:50
a
Free-energy barriers G‡
and G‡syn (I4→TS1syn).
(I2→TS1), G‡
(I2→TS1’), G‡ (I4→TS1anti),
C=O anti
C=C
10 a) J. Cid, J. J. Carbó, E. Fernández, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18,
12794; b) D. García-López, J. Cid, R. Marqués, E. Fernández,
J. J. Carbó, Chem. Eur. J., 2017, 23, 5066.
The diastereoselectivity is decided at the C-C coupling step
where the aldehyde functional group can adopt an anti or a
syn disposition with respect to the borylmethyl unit (TS2anti
and TS2syn). In substrate 1, the anti-configuration minimizes
the 1,2 repulsion between the substituents of cyclobutane,
resulting in a significantly lower free energy barrier (13.7
versus 17.6 kcal·mol- for I4 → TS2anti and I4 → TS2syn
,
respectively). Additional calculations were performed in model
systems replacing each phenyl substituent of Xantphos ligand
by hydrogen and maintained the backbone (PH2 model) sets
off ligand-substrate interactions. The results show that a free-
energy difference between the two diastereoselective paths is
very similar to the real-world ligands, G‡ = +4.2 kcal·mol-1,
indicating that intramolecular interactions within the substrate
(-CH2Bpin···C=O) are responsible of the diastereoselectivity.
Interestingly, introducing a 2-naphthyl group on the alkene
moiety (substrate 24) produced a mixture of anti and syn
diastereoisomers. The computed free-energy difference
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins