J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10859-10860
10859
Table 1. Enantioselective Aldol Reactions between Ethyl
Glyoxylate and Representative Silylketene Acetals (Eq 2)
C2-Symmetric Tin(II) Complexes as Chiral Lewis
Acids. Catalytic Enantioselective Anti Aldol
Additions of Enolsilanes to Glyoxylate and Pyruvate
Esters
David A. Evans,* David W. C. MacMillan, and
Kevin R. Campos
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology
HarVard UniVersity, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
ReceiVed July 28, 1997
a Product ratios determined by HPLC using a Chiralcel OD-H or
AD column after hydrolysis of the product TMS ether (ref 10).
b Relative and absolute stereochemical assignments determined by
independent synthesis (see Supporting Information). c Enolsilane ge-
ometry (Z), isomeric purity g95%. d Product configuration assigned
by analogy. e This experiment was carried out with catalyst 1b (10 mol
%).
Stannous triflate-diamine complexes are effective organi-
zational centers for Lewis acid promoted aldol reactions.1
However, the documented difficulties in rendering these pro-
cesses catalytic in metal complex appear to contradict the
established fact that Sn(II) complexes are kinetically labile
toward ligand substitution.2 In this communication we dem-
onstrate that ligand architecture can play an important role in
the design of Sn(II)-based chiral Lewis acidic complexes.
Specifically, the Lewis acidic complexes 1 and 2 derived from
Sn(OTf)23 and bidentate bis(oxazoline)4 and tridentate pyridyl-
bis(oxazoline)5 ligands6 are efficient anti-aldol catalysts for the
enantioselective addition of enolsilanes to 1,2-dicarbonyl com-
pounds. These ligand-metal complexes exhibit efficient turn-
over in the catalytic cycle and may be employed in amounts as
low as 2 mol %.
superior levels of asymmetric induction exhibited by [Sn((S,S)-
Bn-box)](OTf)2 (1a) which afforded (S)-4 in 98% ee (10 mol
% catalyst, CH2Cl2, -78 °C, 5 min, 99% yield) prompted us to
select this catalyst for further exploration.10 The addition of
substituted (Z) silylketene acetal11 5 to ethyl glyoxylate (eq 1,
R ) Me) in the presence of 1a provides the malate derivative
(S)-612 in high enantioselectivity (95% ee), yield (87%), and
anti reaction diastereoselection (90:10 anti:syn). To our knowl-
edge, only one previous example of a chiral Lewis acid catalyzed
anti-aldol reaction has been reported,13 albeit with higher catalyst
loadings and lower enantioselectivities. As such, further study
into the generality of [Sn((S,S)-Bn-box)](OTf)2 as an anti aldol
catalyst was undertaken (Table 1).
From the results summarized in Table 1, both anti diaste-
reoselection and reaction enantioselectivity (95-98% ee) are
maintained for a range of alkyl-substituted silylketene acetals
(entries 2-5, Me, Et, iPr, iBu). These data document a modest
trend toward higher anti diastereoselection as the steric require-
ments of the enolsilane alkyl substituent increase. Although
phenyl thioester-derived silylketene acetals are generally superior
for additions to glyoxylate esters mediated by 1a, substituted
enolsilanes derived from ethyl and tert-butyl thioesters can also
furnish anti-aldol adducts in high enantioselectivity (entries 6
and 7) (g92:8 anti:syn, 92-96% ee) in the presence of [Sn-
((S,S)-iPr-box)](OTf)2 (1b). The preparative utility of this
methodology has also been evaluated. The addition of si-
lylketene acetal 3 to ethyl glyoxylate was performed on a 25-
mmol scale utilizing complex 1a (2 mol %) to afford (S)-4 (94%
ee, 90% yield).14
The efficiency of complexes 1 and 2 in catalyzing the addition
of enolsilanes to glyoxylate esters (eq 1) was examined.7 In
analogy to related Cu(II) studies,8 it was assumed that chelate
organization between the catalyst and carbonyl-containing
reactant might provide a stereoselective process with this and
related substrates. A survey of ligand architecture for the
addition of silylketene acetal 3 to ethyl glyoxylate (eq 1, R )
H) revealed that several [Sn(box)](OTf)2 complexes 1 (10 mol
%, -78 °C, 5 min) efficiently catalyze the formation of the
malate diester 4 in good yield in greater than 90% ee.9 The
(1) (a) Kobayashi, S.; Horibe, M.; Saito, Y. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 9629-
42. (b) Kobayashi, S.; Uchiro, H.; Shiina, I.; Mukaiyama, T. Tetrahedron
1993, 49, 1761-72.
The capacity of complexes 1 and 2 to facilitate catalyst-
substrate organization through presumed bidentate coordination
was further evaluated with R-keto esters.15 Ligand optimization
in the addition of the substituted silylketene acetal 7 to methyl
pyruvate indicated that both Sn(II)-box and -pybox complexes
(2) Veith, M.; Recktenwald, O. Topics in Current Chemistry, Organotin
Compounds; Springer: Berlin, 1982; Vol. 104, pp 1-58.
(3) Batchelor, R. J.; Ruddick, J. N. K.; Sams, J. R.; Auble, F. Inorg.
Chem. 1977, 16, 1414-17.
(4) Evans, D. A.; Woerpel, K. A.; Hinman, M. M.; Faul, M. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 726-8.
(10) The catalysts were prepared as described above, see ref 7. In a
representative procedure the silylketene acetal (0.50 mmol) and ethyl
glyoxylate (0.75 mmol) were added sequentially to a catalyst solution in
CH2Cl2 (0.8 mL, 0.05 mmol, 10 mol %) at -78 °C. After the reaction was
complete (5 min-2 h), the mixture was filtered through silica with Et2O,
and the silyl ether was hydrolyzed with 1 N HCl in THF (30 min, 25 °C)
to yield the hydroxyester, which was purified by flash chromatography.
(11) For the addition to ethyl glyoxylate catalyzed by 1 and 2,
(E)-silylketene acetals were found to be less reactive and led to the formation
of malate derivatives in lower yield and with diminished anti selectivity.
(12) 3-Alkyl malic acid derivatives may also be obtained through
alkylation of the malate diester-derived enolate. Seebach, D.; Aebi, J.;
Wasmuth, D. Org. Synth. 1984, 63, 109-120, and references cited therein.
(13) Parmee, E. R.; Hong, Y.; Tempkin, O.; Masamune, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 1729-32.
(5) Nishiyama, H.; Kondo, M.; Nakamura, T.; Itoh, K. Organometallics
1991, 10, 500-8.
(6) Sn(OTf)2 derived bis(oxazoline) and pyridyl-bis(oxazoline) complexes
are denoted as [Sn(box)](OTf)2 and [Sn(pybox)](OTf)2, respectively.
(7) Typically the catalysts were formed by stirring bis(oxazolinyl) (0.055
mmol) or bis(oxazolinyl)pyridyl ligands (0.055 mmol) with Sn(OTf)2 (0.05
mmol) in CH2Cl2 (0.8 mL) for 1 h at room temperature to yield homogenous
colorless solutions for box-derived complexes or homogenous yellow
solutions for pybox-derived complexes.
(8) (a) Evans, D. A.; Murry, J. A.; Kozlowski, M. C. J. Am. Chem Soc.
1996, 118, 5814-5815. (b) Evans, D. A.; Kozlowski, M. C.; Burgey, C.
S.; MacMilllan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem Soc. In press.
(9) Enantioselectivities obtained with other [Sn(box)](OTf)2 com-
plexes: [Sn((S,S)-Ph-box)](OTf)2 (91% ee), [Sn((S,S)-iPr-box)](OTf)2 (93%
ee). In contrast, the [Sn(pybox)](OTf)2 complexes (2) proved to be
ineffective catalysts for this reaction.
(14) When this preparative reaction was repeated with 10 mol % catalyst,
the enantioselection was slightly higher (98% ee, 90% yield).
S0002-7863(97)02547-X CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society